They haven’t been proven false, they’ve been dismissed from investigation and gaslighted under election denier claims. That’s what I’m getting at.
You didn’t answer my question.
1 Like
Me neither.
They’re just trying to supply the world with crispy golen brown baked goods.
Those global warming fans just arent happy with anything.
1 Like
Any “debate” with her would have been about Trump election loss denial. It would have only served as a platform for her to beat that decaying horse. She was a TV personality who somehow convinced people she could run things.
1 Like
Q called. He wanted me to tell you to get a grip.
Is gaslighting my response for the 2nd time really the way you want to go with this?
You could’ve just answered my question, but instead you’ve chosen to paint yourself in the same dogmatic light as Tapper, Lemon, Reid and Maddow. Election integrity is so strong it must not be questioned ever, not even when anomalies are present.
2 Likes
Me gaslighting? Let’s recap. I called her an election denier. You asked for proof. I provided specific claims she has made that have been debunked. Then you changed the subject to whether I thought there was no fraud happening, rather than addressing the fact that I was correct all along and that she IS an election denier. All you had to say is “You’re right. She is an election denier.”
I questioned said ‘debunking’ because you believe it is proof she is lying, while I don’t. It wasn’t a subject change, it was me questioning your ‘proof’, which you then avoided repeatedly.
I don’t think this conversation is going anywhere frankly, I think you will continue to call her an election denier no matter how legitimate or illegitimate the election results are. Which raises the question: Is an “election denier” still an election denier if they were right?
Bush and Gore were both election deniers in the 2000 race, if we are branding someone as an ‘election denier’ when they are correct for questioning things. I think it is important to scrutinize the election process, and I think it is more important that the election process hold up to scrutiny… I don’t see that we have the evidence to say it has withstood scrutiny as it has not yet been scrutinized…
I #trustallresults
1 Like
Good. Anyone who doesn’t is a Qanon White Wing Supremacist Fascist Anti Vax Joe Rogan who personally was there during the January 6th Riots.
#NeverForget #Jan6th #SaveOurDemocracy #IBelieveAllWomanAndElectionResults
1 Like
In case anyone needs a reminder:
#believeallscience
#NeverForget
It was horrible. The aftermath resembles that of a home left in the care of a teenager who threw a huge party for his friends, who all got drunk for the first time.
2 Likes
Let’s not forget the unarmed citizens killed by the police on that tragic day.
#BabbitLivesMatter
Police are the enemy, unless they’re killing my enemy who are unarmed, then they are okay until they pull me over for speeding/racially profiling me.
1 Like
Stealing this.
2 Likes
I think you misunderstand the situation:
I mean, just read his words. He believes his truth. He knows The Science.
1 Like
3 Likes
So, we have election deniers and then we have voting (election) integrity fraud deniers
1 Like
It’s not about what he believes but you believing him. The guy isn’t going to say anything that could be used against him.
John Goodman really let himself go.
I haven’t watched the video, but simply based on the fact this monologue wasn’t filmed in his truck tells me the dude is single.
He might be a swell guy with great content, but I’m not committing the 25 minutes to listen haha.
FWIW, i think this video does a great job of explaining my concerns about this election.
^^ not an unbiased source lol
The United States Government does not condone questioning of their behavior whatsoever. COVID? Do not question the science. Election? Do not question the results. They do not want people capable of critical thinking. They want obedient servants.
5 Likes