[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]K2000 wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
Well, thats a bit gay, but in a good way, so dont sweat it.
NTTAWWT, … no, there is nothing wrong with that…
[/quote]
Surprising answer from you… I would have expected that the vaunted Free Market would have provided a better solution on that day.
/sarcasm[/quote]
And for the 349 time:
I dont care if you help someone because you want to.
In fact, I find it to be commendable.
I do have a problem if you take MY money at gunpoint and give it to all kind of shitheads I dont give a fuck about.
Like, I dont know, corn farmers, oil companies, crackheads, liberal arts majors, baby mommas with a litter of around 12, or, god forbid, congressmen. [/quote]
Not to derail the thread, or criticize the original poster…
but there are psychologists who will tell you that one of the primary motivations for charitable giving is that it makes people feel good about themselves, when they give.
I don’t care how many baloney sandwiches your church group hands out on the weekends though, it’s not possibly going to be enough to address the problem of hunger in the world. It takes massive resources to address a big problem like that, such as the massive pooled resources of the government (um, that would be “We the People” in the United States). There is no other not-for-profit organization in the entire world that can attack big problems on that scale.
By all means, people should pass out all the groceries you can afford, and I hope you feel good about it. I occasionally give to panhandlers myself. But do you want to address big problems on a longer term? Or is it simply a small fix just for tonight?
Anyway, just the musings of a Liberal, trying to explain how I think about these situations. It’s never been about trying to “take YOUR money at gunpoint” it’s about wrangling with big social problems and trying to provide a safety net so that the world might be a little less harsh, for the people on the losing end.