Homosexuality, Choice or Genetic

[quote]Floortom wrote:
Being gay is a choice and immoral. The book written about the magical wizard in the sky a few thousand years ago by people who knew about as much as a modern day 5 year old proves it.[/quote]

The best part about this whole argument is that most impartial theologists (read: non religious Biblical scholars) interpret the harsh anti-Gay SENTENCE in Leviticus to be meant to prevent and discourage priests from abusing alter boys and/or taking young boys as payment of any sort.

The irony is lovely.

Remember, according to todays radical Christians, people who take it up the ass are hyper-immoral, but soldiers who kill are fine, rebellious teenagers shouldn’t be stoned, and we should NEVER turn the other cheek.

[quote]Get Stoked wrote:
BodyBldgBabe wrote:
Dedicated wrote:
BodyBldgBabe wrote:

I’ve also met guys that would fool around with other guys when they weren’t getting anything from their wives or girlfriends. So again their homosexuality behavior was acted out because of the lack of heterosexual physical contact.
B-3

Uh, BBB, don’t quite agree with you on that one. If a guy was truly gay and tried to fit into societal norms and married and had children, then I could see him fooling around with men on the side. But, if a dude was a true hetero and his wife wasn’t giving him any I truly don’t see him getting some peter from the neighbor Peter to tide him over. He’d be looking for trim elsewhere from ladies not men.

D

Hmmmm…how do I answer this??

thinking thinking

Okay D, so what your trying to say is that if at any time a man puts a penis in his mouth he’s homo? Or if a women licks the kitty she’s lesbian?

You haven’t had many 3-sums have you?

My advice to you would be, experiment a little sexually then come back and answer this thread.

Oh…and post pictures PLEEEEEAAAAAZE!!!

Where did he say that? All I saw was straight males seek females and not males, which I happen to agree with. I also tend to think that the act of wanting a cock in your mouth and being male is very gay. Being a woman and wanting to eat pussy, thats very gay. Threesomes are as irrelevant to this topic as begging for free porn in the form of OMFG post pics plllllllllllllllz. Not to mention plugging your vast sexual experience which I am sure makes you a key player in unraveling this mystery…

I tend to think Homosexuality is more in the realm of behaviorism and learned response. For instance what kind of father and mother the child has could influence the way the child displays him/herself and this could effect the way peers see him/her. As the young brain is learning who he/she is based off of the interaction with peers many thought processes could be altered one way or another. All living things want to have connections, and they seek them where they are most likely to be satisfied. Throw puberty into the mix and its amazing we all didn’t euthanize ourselves before 18.

scissor me timbers.
[/quote]

Stoked,
Here’s a dime…buy a sense of humor. If you can’t read into the sarcasm of “post pictures of man love” then all I can do is shake my head and say, “I’m sorry you don’t get my sense of humor”. However, luckily most of the ppl out here do, so its really not that big of a deal…its all in jest.

It looks like you are fairly new so once you become more involved out here you’ll be able to read posts with a little more light heartedness.

Good gravy, if we all took DB serious every time he said “give it to her in the pooper” this would be a very unhappy place.

As far as my “vast sexual experience”, what I do behind closed doors and who I do it with is nobody’s business but mine & the individual(s) I’m with but I highly doubt what I do or do not do in the bedroom will unravel any misteries. Trust me…my bedroom action really is not that exciting!!!

On a serious note, I have friends of various sexual orientations and they feel comfortable being honest with me about who they are, what they have done, and how they have experimented sexually because they know I’m the last person to judge them, whether I approve or disapprove of what they do.

I have know people, both male & female, who have experimented during 3-sums and even though they may have had same-sex sex, it in no shape or form made them gay.

So talking about 3-sums is VERY relative to this thread.

B-3

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
BodyBldgBabe wrote:
Oh come on you guys…lets keep it fun and not bring religion into it and start making me feel guilty! Lets just continue to post lots of pictures of really hot guys getting all sweaty while expressing their man love to each other. Someone can post videos or just audios of them gagging on each others money shot. Don’t forget to send pictures of the explosion ooozing out of the side of male “a”'s mouth, while male “b” licks it up clean.

Now…if this thread was about two girls gettin’ it on Jesus wouldn’t be mentioned at all.

So give me a thread with pictures, videos, and lots of man love so I can scream “hit it” and “give it to him in the pooper!!!”

ROFLMAO!!!
ROFLMAO!!!
ROFLMAO!!!

Damn, I crack myself up sometimes!!!

Okay.

[/quote]

Hey HH!!!

So glad you get the humor in this!!! Maybe you can send Stoked a PM and fill him in!!

Thanks Buddy!

B-3

[quote]IceGiant wrote:
tedro wrote :

I agree, as I said before, I doubt there is a purely genetic reason, but their is almost certainly some sort of biological reason that gives people homosexual tendencies. There are also likely biological reasons that cause some people to be sexual predators, child molesters, or even serial killers. Whether or not one acts on these urges is purely choice. I believe that God challenges us all in different ways and ultimately gives us the free will to make our own decisions. The decision to participate in homosexual behaviors is presicely that, a decision.

Even my half brother would agree with this statement…and he’s attracted to men. We were both raised in Christian homes and have great parents. He understands its a choice and like “Tedro” said God challenges us.He has struggled w/ this for years but finally allowed God to work in his life. Man was created for a woman and vica versa. Thats the beauty of free will though. You can agree with this statement or disagree. I won’t dislike someone cause they have different viewpoints than me. [/quote]

BRAVO!!!

[quote]BodyBldgBabe wrote:
IceGiant wrote:
tedro wrote :

I agree, as I said before, I doubt there is a purely genetic reason, but their is almost certainly some sort of biological reason that gives people homosexual tendencies. There are also likely biological reasons that cause some people to be sexual predators, child molesters, or even serial killers. Whether or not one acts on these urges is purely choice. I believe that God challenges us all in different ways and ultimately gives us the free will to make our own decisions. The decision to participate in homosexual behaviors is presicely that, a decision.

Even my half brother would agree with this statement…and he’s attracted to men. We were both raised in Christian homes and have great parents. He understands its a choice and like “Tedro” said God challenges us.He has struggled w/ this for years but finally allowed God to work in his life. Man was created for a woman and vica versa. Thats the beauty of free will though. You can agree with this statement or disagree. I won’t dislike someone cause they have different viewpoints than me.

BRAVO!!!

[/quote]

This is a great example of choice, but also a great example of why we should still treat gays with compassion. I am willing to guess that if your brother was ridiculed and belittled it would have driven him even more towards the gay community, and the choice he made would have been even more difficult. Much respect for him.

Um . . . no, it’s an example of siblings being born with different traits. You’ve never known of two siblings to have, say, different color eyes? My sibling and I have different color eyes. That example proves nothing.

[quote]tedro wrote:
BodyBldgBabe wrote:
IceGiant wrote:
tedro wrote :

I agree, as I said before, I doubt there is a purely genetic reason, but their is almost certainly some sort of biological reason that gives people homosexual tendencies. There are also likely biological reasons that cause some people to be sexual predators, child molesters, or even serial killers. Whether or not one acts on these urges is purely choice. I believe that God challenges us all in different ways and ultimately gives us the free will to make our own decisions. The decision to participate in homosexual behaviors is presicely that, a decision.

Even my half brother would agree with this statement…and he’s attracted to men. We were both raised in Christian homes and have great parents. He understands its a choice and like “Tedro” said God challenges us.He has struggled w/ this for years but finally allowed God to work in his life. Man was created for a woman and vica versa. Thats the beauty of free will though. You can agree with this statement or disagree. I won’t dislike someone cause they have different viewpoints than me.

BRAVO!!!

This is a great example of choice, but also a great example of why we should still treat gays with compassion. I am willing to guess that if your brother was ridiculed and belittled it would have driven him even more towards the gay community, and the choice he made would have been even more difficult. Much respect for him.
[/quote]

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
Any sex not for procreation can be harmful to society. [/quote]

Most sex for procreation is harmful to society.

[quote]MTMNYC wrote:
From a gay man here, I am curious as to the logic of most who replied to this thread. Some classics:
Kailash: " its because the gay mans mother is ugly".
To Kailash: My mother is very attractive even so at 67 now.
[/quote]

You know the rules of this forum–

post those pictures.

[quote]BodyBldgBabe wrote:

I have know people, both male & female, who have experimented during 3-sums and even though they may have had same-sex sex, it in no shape or form made them gay.

So talking about 3-sums is VERY relative to this thread.

B-3[/quote]

Now this is a very interesting observation.

What’s the delineation between homosexual behavior and homosexuality?

If there’s no delineation, how is it possible that people experiment, particularly if there is absolutely no choice involved? Unless your position that everyone who has ever experimented is gay?

How is it possible for people to go “gay for the stay” - gay in prison - or for there to the be so many collegiate lesbians at all girls schools who turn straight after graduation? Unless again, they’re all actually gay?

Suffice it to say, I’m certain it’s a much more complicated discussion than just “it’s a choice” or “it’s innate” - heck, as I said in the beginning, it’s a discussion just to define “it” as either the particular behavior or some sort of definitive “sexuality.”

[quote]tedro wrote:
I care because I want my children and grandchildren and their children to live in a free, moral America. I don’t want the gay agenda shoved down their throat. I don’t want some liberal-hippie-commies controlling this country and crying every time somebody may be slightly offended. I want them to live in a free society where people are moral, respectful, and just.
[/quote]

I want my children and grandchildren living in a free, moral America as well. But here’s a question that you need to ask yourself: Do you want your children living in a country where the government can tell them who they can and cannot marry? Or better yet, would you want to live in an America where the government (or other people for that matter) can tell YOU who you can and can’t marry?

Really think that question through and think about the ramifications that it could have. The government in American is no longer “of the people, for the people and by the people” (unless you define “the people” as being the 1% of super rich scumbags who are actually in control of this country), these people have an agenda and if you give them the chance, will push that agenda on you.

What if someone came out and suggested that there could be no more interracial marriages and used statistical evidence that the majority of prisoners are of african and hispanic decent? Therefore, those groups of people are inherently more violent and prone to crime. We should just breed them out of the gene pool and this would decrease crime in our country, thus making it a more moral and safe place (by the way I do not in any way agree with anything I just wrote, I’m simply using it as an example).

What if someone suggested that Muslims (or any other religious group) should no longer be able to procreate because…point to some either current or past atrocity committed by this group, it won’t be too hard to find one for pretty much any religious group in history?

Oh, but that infringes on your “freedom of religion” right? Well what about every individual having the right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”? Those rights were held to be “inalienable” (meaning inherent to all humans) by the founding fathers of this country. Yet you would deny certain groups of people those rights, simply because they choose to make different life choices than you.

And don’t try to bring the bible or Jesus into this. There are passages in the bible that basically say that it’s ok to sell your daughter into slavery (Exodus 21:7) or that working on Sunday shall be punishable by death (Exodus 35:2)? Are you a football fan? Ever played football before? Because according to the bible touching the skin of a dead pig makes one “unclean” (Leviticus 11:7).

Are you for stoning people to death for planting different crops side by side? Are you for burning people for wearing clothes made from different materials? The bible states in no uncertain terms all of the above. Do you think that women should be able to teach? Because Timothy clearly says that they shouldn’t, and should be silent and submissive.

“Christians” seem to be big on quoting that line in Leviticus as being all the justification that they need for homosexuality being a sin. Yet, they seem to conveniently over look all of those other passages from the bible which aren’t so en vogue in the religious community.

Also, I put the word Christians in parenthesis because to be honest, I don’t think that a true Christian could believe the religious propaganda/agenda that is portrayed as Christianity by the “religious right”. Oh, and by the way, I would consider myself to be Christian.

There is a great quote by Ghandi that says, “I like your Christ. I don’t like your Christians, they are nothing like your Christ.”

To me that quote pretty much says it all. Read back through the bible, Jesus accepted everyone he came across, thieves, prostitutes, murderers, everyone. Really the only people he had a problem with were those who were trying to manipulate others and place judgement upon them. He was also an independent thinker (unlike many Christians who are basically spoon fed their entire belief and morality systems), he was honest, kind, forgiving, non judgemental and willing to die for his principles. Now that’s a person to model a good life after.

There are of course others, Ghandi, Martin Luthor King, John Lennon, Bobby Kennedy, Socrates, to name a few. What’s really ironic (and I got this from a George Carlin skit) is that every time someone comes along and tells us that we should all live together in peace and happiness, we kill them.

Back to the topic at hand, to be honest guys and gals the only reason we even need to discuss whether being homosexual is a choice or genetic is because people are trying to find justifications for their behaviors due to being discriminated against. Without that discrimination, people wouldn’t even need to find reasons “why they were gay”.

Edit: By the way that part about Christians was not specifically directed towards you (or anyone else on this forum). It was more of a blanket pet peeve that I have with a lot of people who claim to be Christian, but are amount the quickest to judge others and point fingers of anyone (something that is not Christ like in any way).

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
lixy wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
So what is your problem with gay sex? Don’t gay people need to release stress and other tensions?

I don’t have a problem with it per se. I just rebuked your argument that “any sex not for procreation can be harmful to society”. It is obvious to me that, in general, homosexuality does more harm than good to society. Feel free to disagree, but at least have the decency to get out of your binary bubble and past one-liners.

I fail to see the difference regarding potential harm to society when comparing heterosexual sex (outside of procreating) and homosexual sex. Both have the potential to spread disease, create ill feelings etc.

Both can be harmful to society. [/quote]

Zap is exactly right. For years, sex not for procreation was considered “harmful” to society. There were even laws against it - you could go to jail if you were caught licking your girlfriend’s coochie. Coochie-licking was an “unnatural” act not meant for procreation, and therefore harmful to society.

What Zap is saying is that many of the same arguments that are made against homosexuality can also be made for other kinds of sexual behavior.

Oh, I had to laugh at the counter-argument to Zap that sex not meant for procreation is okat because it releases stress. Some days I get so pissed at upper management in my company that I just want to beat the crap out of some of the managers. It would relieve A LOT of stress. I’m sure many would agree that being able to beat the crap out of management would relieve a lot of stress. Therefore, according to your logic, beating up managers would be good for society. Should that be allowed?

[quote]etaco wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
Any sex not for procreation can be harmful to society.

Most sex for procreation is harmful to society.[/quote]

You are talking about Klippy’s poor dad.

Quick answer: This depends on the manager in question. :wink:

[quote]MikeTheBear wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
lixy wrote:

Oh, I had to laugh at the counter-argument to Zap that sex not meant for procreation is okat because it releases stress. Some days I get so pissed at upper management in my company that I just want to beat the crap out of some of the managers. It would relieve A LOT of stress. I’m sure many would agree that being able to beat the crap out of management would relieve a lot of stress. Therefore, according to your logic, beating up managers would be good for society. Should that be allowed?
[/quote]

[quote]Sentoguy wrote:

I want my children and grandchildren living in a free, moral America as well. But here’s a question that you need to ask yourself: Do you want your children living in a country where the government can tell them who they can and cannot marry? Or better yet, would you want to live in an America where the government (or other people for that matter) can tell YOU who you can and can’t marry?

[/quote]

To some extent, YES. I don’t want a 22 year old that my 13 year old daughter has a crush on to be able to marry her. I further think that marriage is between a man and a woman. Marrigae is sacred and came about for the sake of family and parentage.

[quote]etaco wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
Any sex not for procreation can be harmful to society.

Most sex for procreation is harmful to society.[/quote]

Only when it’s done by some of the people in this thread…

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Sentoguy wrote:

I want my children and grandchildren living in a free, moral America as well. But here’s a question that you need to ask yourself: Do you want your children living in a country where the government can tell them who they can and cannot marry? Or better yet, would you want to live in an America where the government (or other people for that matter) can tell YOU who you can and can’t marry?

To some extent, YES. I don’t want a 22 year old that my 13 year old daughter has a crush on to be able to marry her. I further think that marriage is between a man and a woman. Marrigae is sacred and came about for the sake of family and parentage.

[/quote]

Ok, I see your point. Perhaps my questions were a little too open ended. I was talking about two consenting individuals of legal age. Do you want the government to be able to tell your daughter that she can’t marry the individual (of legal age) who she loves and truly wants to spend the rest of her life with?

Or how about yourself? How would you have felt if after meeting your wife, the woman who you love so much that you’re willing to make a pledge to be faithful to for the rest of your life, the government all of the sudden stepped in and told you that you couldn’t marry her. And not only that, but that it was immoral for you to engage in any kind of sexual acts with her? You probably wouldn’t have been too happy now would you?

The problem with most of the people who down play discrimination and seem to be so adamantly supporting the immorality of gay marriage/sexual preference is that the majority of them are probably the “norm” and have never had to deal with discrimination themselves. So, they basically cannot, or at least have not ever identified with those who do.

Really this whole “homosexuality is harmful to society” is a baseless argument with no statistical evidence to support it, no anecdotal evidence to support it, and really no logical evidence to support it. Some of the most successful and influential societies of all time accepted homosexual behavior (Rome and Greece to name a couple).

Finally I do agree with your last statement that marriage came about for the sake of family and parentage. But, who are you to define what “family” means, and cannot two people of the same sex still serve the purpose of parentage?

I live in quite the homosexual friendly area myself and know several people who have same sex parents. They’re all well adjusted, good citizens. I also know several people who were raised by opposite sex parents who turned out to be criminals, or at least poorly developed individuals. I’m not saying that all homosexual raised children are good and that all heterosexual raised children are bad. But I personally can’t understand why people want to try to suggest the opposite.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
etaco wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
Any sex not for procreation can be harmful to society.

Most sex for procreation is harmful to society.

You are talking about Klippy’s poor dad.[/quote]

It´s a shame-

Really-

Imagine giving your son money for embarrassingly cheap hookers and he turns around and wastes it.

I would not know what to say.

[quote]Headhunter wrote:

Sex was not invented (or evolved) for unnatural barbaric acts. Your anus is there for taking a dump, not to play ‘hide-the-weenie’. [/quote]

Whoa Nelly!!! Back the truck up on this one HH!!! I personally have never “had it in the pooper” as DB loves to say, but from what Im told a finger and tounge is pretty darn nice!!! So let’s not say tushy play is barbaric!!! Plllllz!

A thought:

If Government should support marriage in order to support pro-creation than:

China, who had an overpopulation problem, should be giving out massive benefits for gay marriages by that same logic.

Sodomy is considered wrong for one reason: The Bible.

As the Bible is a faulty source of morality, we cannot consider teh ghey to be bad because of two or three vague lines decrying it.

I’m pretty sure kissing has no point HH. It’s done only for pleasure. THE MOUTH IS MEANT FOR EATING DAMMIT.

Is kissing immoral too?

Your logic blows (almost literally). You’re basing it on a book written by conservative old men thousands of years ago.

There is nothing wrong with being gay. Being attracted to men is biological. One “chooses”, by being “true to ones self” to be gay.

[quote]Beowolf wrote:
Sodomy is considered wrong for one reason: The Bible. [/quote]

If that is so, how do you explain article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice? Is it based on the Bible?