[quote]H factor wrote:
Which can you find more examples of “fisting” kits or catholic sex abuse cases SM?
[/quote]
You mean sex abuse of children by gays in the Catholic Church? Not sure how that helps your argument…[/quote]
I think you do see exactly how it helps.
If gays in general are responsible for the weird fringe action of handing out creepy books to kids, then the Church is responsible for the weird (and infinitely more detrimental) fringe action of raping children.
Not that all Catholic abuse is gay abuse: “Data analyzed by John Jay researchers, shows that the number and proportion of sexual misconduct directed at girls under 8 years old was higher than that experienced by boys the same age.”
GLSEN aren’t qualified to deal with suicidal youth. If a kid is suicidal he should be sent to a qualified psychologist or psychiatrist. Not sent to a radical homosexual activist.[/quote]
Your response to “radical” homosexual activist is to be a radical anti-gay advocate?
“Specifically, between 1950 and 2002, there were 246 girls younger than 8 who were sexually abused by priests (representing 14 percent of all girl victims), compared with 236 boys.”
So, shall we begin forcibly defrocking the whole lot of iniquitous fucks?
A decade ago, “hundreds” of kids received an inappropriate pamphlet.
Per H Factor’s point, how many kids were violently raped by the ordained tha year?
Should we make a tally and punish the entire respective communities accordingly? Or should we stop thinking in decades-old anecdotes about the weird fringes of groups that comprise millions of decent and right-thinking people–because we’re all intelligent here, and we all understand how flimsy a sweeping moral/public policy argument is when it’s backed up by half-true links to decades-old anecdotes.[/quote]
I’m not going to waste my time in posting more examples. First you argued that Fistgate 1 and Fistgate 2 were a single, one off incident. When I gave another example you then complained that it was ten years ago and therefore didn’t matter. Now you think that by mentioning the rampant abuse of children by homosexuals in the Catholic Church you’ve somehow discredited me. It’s farcical.
[quote]smh_23 wrote:
“Specifically, between 1950 and 2002, there were 246 girls younger than 8 who were sexually abused by priests (representing 14 percent of all girl victims), compared with 236 boys.”
So, shall we begin forcibly defrocking the whole lot of iniquitous fucks?[/quote]
Criminally prosecute them. You won’t find me attempting to minimise the scale of the problem.
GLSEN aren’t qualified to deal with suicidal youth. If a kid is suicidal he should be sent to a qualified psychologist or psychiatrist. Not sent to a radical homosexual activist.[/quote]
Your response to “radical” homosexual activist is to be a radical anti-gay advocate? [/quote]
Actually prior to the 1990’s my views were mainstream. Sorry I’m not as enlightened as you big city folk. I’m not as eager to jump on the bandwagon.
You think they are stupid questions yet you read a site from a guy who argues these very things. You don’t want to be “linked” to insane thoughts like those quit making Mass Resistance your website of choice for sharing.
You read insanely biased “news” and hate sites then get pissed when people ask you if you feel the way as the people who run the websites you read.
GLSEN aren’t qualified to deal with suicidal youth. If a kid is suicidal he should be sent to a qualified psychologist or psychiatrist. Not sent to a radical homosexual activist.[/quote]
Your response to “radical” homosexual activist is to be a radical anti-gay advocate? [/quote]
Actually prior to the 1990’s my views were mainstream. Sorry I’m not as enlightened as you big city folk. I’m not as eager to jump on the bandwagon.[/quote]
I would bet I’m originally from a smaller and more conservative area than you grew up in and currently live in a smaller and more conservative area than you.
I’m also old enough and rational enough to not be scared and obsessed by what other people do in the bedroom. Maybe one day you’ll stop cowering in fear over a few skipping gay people and man up? I’m not fearful for my heterosexuality, why are you?
If gays in general are responsible for the weird fringe action of handing out creepy books to kids, then the Church is responsible for the weird (and infinitely more detrimental) fringe action of raping children.
[/quote]
Firstly, I’m not against gays and I don’t blame all gays for the things I’m talking about. I blame radical gay activists. That’s why I use that term instead of just gays - to distinguish them from gays who don’t support radicalism. Secondly, the Catholic Church is responsible for the sexual abuse. Why? Because the highest echelons in the Catholic Church were complicit in covering it up. As I said, you won’t find me defending them.
GLSEN aren’t qualified to deal with suicidal youth. If a kid is suicidal he should be sent to a qualified psychologist or psychiatrist. Not sent to a radical homosexual activist.[/quote]
Your response to “radical” homosexual activist is to be a radical anti-gay advocate? [/quote]
Actually prior to the 1990’s my views were mainstream. Sorry I’m not as enlightened as you big city folk. I’m not as eager to jump on the bandwagon.[/quote]
I would bet I’m originally from a smaller and more conservative area than you grew up in and currently live in a smaller and more conservative area than you.
In the Republic of Ireland ‘state-ordered investigations documented “tens of thousands of children from the 1940s to the 1990s” who suffered abuse including sexual abuse at the hands of priests, nuns, and church staff…’
I’d say it’s pretty prevalent. I also think it is more prevalent in the Catholic Church. The main reason is probably clerical celibacy.
In the Republic of Ireland ‘state-ordered investigations documented “tens of thousands of children from the 1940s to the 1990s” who suffered abuse including sexual abuse at the hands of priests, nuns, and church staff…’
I’d say it’s pretty prevalent. I also think it is more prevalent in the Catholic Church. The main reason is probably clerical celibacy.[/quote]
Consider the statistics: In accordance with a requirement of President Bush’s No Child Left Behind Act, in 2002 the Department of Education carried out a study of sexual abuse in the school system.
Hofstra University researcher Charol Shakeshaft looked into the problem, and the first thing that came to her mind when Education Week reported on the study were the daily headlines about the Catholic Church.
“[T]hink the Catholic Church has a problem?” she said. “The physical sexual abuse of students in schools is likely more than 100 times the abuse by priests.”
I was unaware of the vow of celibacy for teachers.
