Guts

Off Topic
21

444×527 105 KB

[quote]pushmepullme wrote:
Chuck rocks my socks.

My brother in law wrote him a fan letter of some sort. Chuck responded with a friendship bracelet that is something like “Chuck <3 Jake”. I will have to go find it next time I’m at my parents’ house.

And yes, it’s a rip off when you copy a story, and don’t give a proper cite.[/quote]

This is most disturbing … How can I hate someone who says things like this? How do I find hate for someone who likes Chuck like I like Chuck? I think I just divided by zero…

22

ITT Chuck Pahlaniuk tries to write the grossest story for shock value, just like all his other stories. For extra points he tries to rope god into it (see choke). Fight club was a one off stroke of brilliance, the other stuff of his is garbage.

23

I tried but the I lol’d. Carrots and lube going down the convey belt

24

That was a fucking horrifying read, please tell me it’s not true.

25

[quote]Steel Nation wrote:
Didn’t mean to rip him off? You copy/pasted the entire story.
EDIT: Put a by-line next time.

That book is awesome by the way, as is most of Chuck’s work. He is a sick fuck.[/quote]

Christ now i remember why i dont argue with idiots on the internet you have to explain every single thing you say ! im not english by nature so go get a life instead of correcting people english on the interwebs !

I MEANT THAT I DID NOT MEAN TO TAKE CREDIT FOR CHUCKS WORK BUT OBVIOUSLY PEOPLE READ THE STORY AND LIKED IT ENOUGH TO WRITE IN A THREAD ABOUT IT SO I DONT REGRET POSTING IT !

so if you got more complaints go cry in front of your parents or something !?

26

[quote]clockworkchad wrote:
ITT Chuck Pahlaniuk tries to write the grossest story for shock value, just like all his other stories. For extra points he tries to rope god into it (see choke). Fight club was a one off stroke of brilliance, the other stuff of his is garbage.
[/quote]

All of his books are the same. Edward Norton versus Tyler Durden, Choke guy versus his mom, Saint Gut-free and all the other writers versus Mr Whittier. Same in invisible monsters etc They all talk the same and have the same ideas. He just changes names.

That being said, for the first two books or so the idea is still sick. Haunted was his best book I think. Then Fight Club. Then it just gets repetitive.

Blunt! Next time cite you thief!

27

Ghost carrot… LOL!

28

[quote]MementoMori wrote:

[quote]clockworkchad wrote:
ITT Chuck Pahlaniuk tries to write the grossest story for shock value, just like all his other stories. For extra points he tries to rope god into it (see choke). Fight club was a one off stroke of brilliance, the other stuff of his is garbage.
[/quote]

All of his books are the same. Edward Norton versus Tyler Durden, Choke guy versus his mom, Saint Gut-free and all the other writers versus Mr Whittier. Same in invisible monsters etc They all talk the same and have the same ideas. He just changes names.

That being said, for the first two books or so the idea is still sick. Haunted was his best book I think. Then Fight Club. Then it just gets repetitive.

Blunt! Next time cite you thief![/quote]

So you want Palahniuk to write a story without a protagonist or antagonist? Interesting idea. I’m sure that will be a real page turner.

By the way, Survivor is his best work IMO.

edit: To be fair, though. When he misses his mark, his work can become little more than shock for shocks sake. I recently read Snuff and did not find much worth considering in that one. I suppose perhaps my reply was a bit harsh. Sorry 'bout that.

29

Thanks for posting for others to read. Truth be told,It took me 4 times to read section by section to finish up the whole story and even after that,I felt uneasy and really “weak in the knees” I like that Russian saying but I wonder if Russians actually say that?

30

SPOILER

Btw,how the fuck does his sister get pregnate from floating semen in a pool? Is that even possible?

31

ugh

32

[quote]SmilingPolitely wrote:

[quote]MementoMori wrote:

[quote]clockworkchad wrote:
ITT Chuck Pahlaniuk tries to write the grossest story for shock value, just like all his other stories. For extra points he tries to rope god into it (see choke). Fight club was a one off stroke of brilliance, the other stuff of his is garbage.
[/quote]

All of his books are the same. Edward Norton versus Tyler Durden, Choke guy versus his mom, Saint Gut-free and all the other writers versus Mr Whittier. Same in invisible monsters etc They all talk the same and have the same ideas. He just changes names.

That being said, for the first two books or so the idea is still sick. Haunted was his best book I think. Then Fight Club. Then it just gets repetitive.

Blunt! Next time cite you thief![/quote]

So you want Palahniuk to write a story without a protagonist or antagonist? Interesting idea. I’m sure that will be a real page turner.

By the way, Survivor is his best work IMO.

edit: To be fair, though. When he misses his mark, his work can become little more than shock for shocks sake. I recently read Snuff and did not find much worth considering in that one. I suppose perhaps my reply was a bit harsh. Sorry 'bout that.[/quote]

Given the edit I won’t answer as harshly as I may have, but I think you misunderstood my point. Every main protagonist and antagonist is the SAME person. They use the same turns of phrase and idiosyncracies. Each protagonist is a jaded, cowed and unmotivated introvert who is explicitly manipulated by a anarchist orator. He just changes names, not characters.

All that being said I own 4 Palanuik books and loved them for the most part. I just won’t buy the other 4 or 5 because they are now all the same.

33

FUCK!!!

Im with RGSZ, this story is fuckin me up. I too tend to visualize a lot.

I have to fart right now, but I am afraid of what could potentially happen…

34

… that was the most vile disgusting vulgar MOST INSIGHTFUL PIECE OF LITERATURE, EVER.

My god… “That is our invisible carrot.” Amazing!

35

enjoyed that…lol

36

[quote]kheaslim wrote:

[quote]LankyMofo wrote:
Cliffnotes?[/quote]

  • OP’s friend #1 decides to put carrot in his ass. Carrot dissapears. Where did it go? He’ll never know and it will haunt him forever.

-OP’s friend #2 decides to put a stick of candle wax in his dick while beating off. Dick swallows candle wax, cripples friend #2 and has to go to the hospital. Parents pay for surgery with college fund. He is sad.

-OP likes to beat off in the pool while the filter sucks on his ass with 400lbs of pressure. OP gets stuck and tries to swim away. He see’s a giant veiny snake full of corn and shit trying to pull him back under. He sees a vitamin pill inside the snake only to realise that the snake is actually his colon, and it was sucked right out of him.

-Op’s virgin sister gets pregnant from the nut he busted in the pool.

The End. [/quote]

I like your version better.

37

[quote]MementoMori wrote:

[quote]SmilingPolitely wrote:

[quote]MementoMori wrote:

[quote]clockworkchad wrote:
ITT Chuck Pahlaniuk tries to write the grossest story for shock value, just like all his other stories. For extra points he tries to rope god into it (see choke). Fight club was a one off stroke of brilliance, the other stuff of his is garbage.
[/quote]

All of his books are the same. Edward Norton versus Tyler Durden, Choke guy versus his mom, Saint Gut-free and all the other writers versus Mr Whittier. Same in invisible monsters etc They all talk the same and have the same ideas. He just changes names.

That being said, for the first two books or so the idea is still sick. Haunted was his best book I think. Then Fight Club. Then it just gets repetitive.

Blunt! Next time cite you thief![/quote]

So you want Palahniuk to write a story without a protagonist or antagonist? Interesting idea. I’m sure that will be a real page turner.

By the way, Survivor is his best work IMO.

edit: To be fair, though. When he misses his mark, his work can become little more than shock for shocks sake. I recently read Snuff and did not find much worth considering in that one. I suppose perhaps my reply was a bit harsh. Sorry 'bout that.[/quote]

Given the edit I won’t answer as harshly as I may have, but I think you misunderstood my point. Every main protagonist and antagonist is the SAME person. They use the same turns of phrase and idiosyncracies. Each protagonist is a jaded, cowed and unmotivated introvert who is explicitly manipulated by a anarchist orator. He just changes names, not characters.

All that being said I own 4 Palanuik books and loved them for the most part. I just won’t buy the other 4 or 5 because they are now all the same.
[/quote]

x2

Palaniuk got old very very fast. the first few you read are great though.

38

[quote]Totenkopf wrote:
SPOILER

Btw,how the fuck does his sister get pregnate from floating semen in a pool? Is that even possible?[/quote]

I imagine the story is made up bro. She has a better chance of getting a UTI than a baby from a pool filled with intestine and semen. ugh fuck man. Some things you can’t “unsee” or unthink, in this case.

39

[quote]hockechamp14 wrote:

[quote]Totenkopf wrote:
SPOILER

Btw,how the fuck does his sister get pregnate from floating semen in a pool? Is that even possible?[/quote]

I imagine the story is made up bro. She has a better chance of getting a UTI than a baby from a pool filled with intestine and semen. ugh fuck man. Some things you can’t “unsee” or unthink, in this case.[/quote]

Unless his sister was also in the pool and he came inside of her (aka they were fucking), her getting pregnant from his stale semen is physically impossible. Semen die within seconds of being out of their environment.

40

Meh… Doesn’t hold a candle to Scrotie McBoogerballs.