[quote]theuofh wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
Any reason one shouldn’t be thinking about 6.5 Grendel in a bench shooting AR for 200-600 yard ranges?
I reload so no issue on ammo being expensive.
Is there a better cartridge I should be thinking about/comparing it too?[/quote]
At those ranges, a heavy .223 bullet will work fine.
If you want to be thorough with it, go to JBM (JBM - Calculations) and compare the drops and wind corrections with the bullet weight you plan to shoot. You’ll have to do some googling to try and figure out what velocity you will likely be at.
The trade-off is going to be in component availability and reloading costs, and I think the .223 will win hands down there. [/quote]
I’ve got an AR that can handle the heaviest of bullets, but I don’t want to switch my scope and red dot off my bolt gun, which can’t handle over 69 grains or so based on my readings.
And yes, the 223 is cheaper to re-load, however, I have load data for the same power, and the charge is only 40-50% more in the 6.5G.
I’ll likely NOT go with a 6.5G AR, as it will end up a $1500+ rifle easy, and that isn’t even a nice barrel. I can get a scoped Mossberg in 308 win that will be $600 off the shelf and I love their new trigger.
Already have the 15 lowers… and If I’m going to the AR 10 route, I’ll just get another bolt.
The idea was to build a gun on the lowers I have that packs a man size punch at that range, and is reasonably accurate. I won’t be shooting that far often, dozen times a year or so, so reloading at .50-70 cents a round isn’t an issue.