[quote]pushharder wrote:
Attorney: Draconian gun laws put NJ man in prison for 35 days
Read more: Attorney: Draconian gun laws put NJ man in prison for 35 days | The Daily Caller
[/quote]
That is some serious racists cops. There is going to be a real crap storm around this except the liberal media will not talk about it.
“They don?t believe this was just a spreadsheet. They believe it was a score sheet,” the unidentified career cop told Lupica. “This was the work of a video gamer, and that it was his intent to put his own name at the very top of that list. They believe that he picked an elementary school because he felt it was a point of least resistance, where he could rack up the greatest number of kills. That’s what (the Connecticut police) believe.”
[quote]Alpha F wrote:
“They don?t believe this was just a spreadsheet. They believe it was a score sheet,” the unidentified career cop told Lupica. “This was the work of a video gamer, and that it was his intent to put his own name at the very top of that list. They believe that he picked an elementary school because he felt it was a point of least resistance, where he could rack up the greatest number of kills. That’s what (the Connecticut police) believe.”
Better ban every gun in Call of Duty so this doesn’t happen again…
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Alpha F wrote:
“They don?t believe this was just a spreadsheet. They believe it was a score sheet,” the unidentified career cop told Lupica. “This was the work of a video gamer, and that it was his intent to put his own name at the very top of that list. They believe that he picked an elementary school because he felt it was a point of least resistance, where he could rack up the greatest number of kills. That’s what (the Connecticut police) believe.”
Better ban every gun in Call of Duty so this doesn’t happen again…[/quote]
It’s not guns and it’s not video games. The kids was crazy and this was the route he took.
For the record, I just bought a Sig version of the AR-15 today on a whim, with a really cool optics set up.
Have no plans of going to shoot anyone, but I have several houses (travel for work) and like each one stocked with basic gear that includes an AR.
[quote]thethirdruffian wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Alpha F wrote:
“They don?t believe this was just a spreadsheet. They believe it was a score sheet,” the unidentified career cop told Lupica. “This was the work of a video gamer, and that it was his intent to put his own name at the very top of that list. They believe that he picked an elementary school because he felt it was a point of least resistance, where he could rack up the greatest number of kills. That’s what (the Connecticut police) believe.”
Better ban every gun in Call of Duty so this doesn’t happen again…[/quote]
It’s not guns and it’s not video games. The kids was crazy and this was the route he took.
For the record, I just bought a Sig version of the AR-15 today on a whim, with a really cool optics set up.
Have no plans of going to shoot anyone, but I have several houses (travel for work) and like each one stocked with basic gear that includes an AR.[/quote]
I was being sarcastic.
[quote]thethirdruffian wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Alpha F wrote:
“They don?t believe this was just a spreadsheet. They believe it was a score sheet,” the unidentified career cop told Lupica. “This was the work of a video gamer, and that it was his intent to put his own name at the very top of that list. They believe that he picked an elementary school because he felt it was a point of least resistance, where he could rack up the greatest number of kills. That’s what (the Connecticut police) believe.”
Better ban every gun in Call of Duty so this doesn’t happen again…[/quote]
It’s not guns and it’s not video games. The kids was crazy and this was the route he took.
For the record, I just bought a Sig version of the AR-15 today on a whim, with a really cool optics set up.
Have no plans of going to shoot anyone, but I have several houses (travel for work) and like each one stocked with basic gear that includes an AR.[/quote]
How do you like the Sig 556? I’m currently quite tempted to pick one up myself, but I don’t have a ton of experience with the AR platform.
[quote]Legionary wrote:
[quote]thethirdruffian wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Alpha F wrote:
“They don?t believe this was just a spreadsheet. They believe it was a score sheet,” the unidentified career cop told Lupica. “This was the work of a video gamer, and that it was his intent to put his own name at the very top of that list. They believe that he picked an elementary school because he felt it was a point of least resistance, where he could rack up the greatest number of kills. That’s what (the Connecticut police) believe.”
Better ban every gun in Call of Duty so this doesn’t happen again…[/quote]
It’s not guns and it’s not video games. The kids was crazy and this was the route he took.
For the record, I just bought a Sig version of the AR-15 today on a whim, with a really cool optics set up.
Have no plans of going to shoot anyone, but I have several houses (travel for work) and like each one stocked with basic gear that includes an AR.[/quote]
How do you like the Sig 556? I’m currently quite tempted to pick one up myself, but I don’t have a ton of experience with the AR platform.[/quote]
I don’t know. I just bought it at lunch. Went in to find .22LR ammo and ended up dropping $3800 on an AR, optics, a case of .223 and a case of .40.
Oh, and the .22LR.
The optics gather the natural light and also have tritium for night shooting. Very similar to what I used in Afganistan.
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]thethirdruffian wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Alpha F wrote:
“They don?t believe this was just a spreadsheet. They believe it was a score sheet,” the unidentified career cop told Lupica. “This was the work of a video gamer, and that it was his intent to put his own name at the very top of that list. They believe that he picked an elementary school because he felt it was a point of least resistance, where he could rack up the greatest number of kills. That’s what (the Connecticut police) believe.”
Better ban every gun in Call of Duty so this doesn’t happen again…[/quote]
It’s not guns and it’s not video games. The kids was crazy and this was the route he took.
For the record, I just bought a Sig version of the AR-15 today on a whim, with a really cool optics set up.
Have no plans of going to shoot anyone, but I have several houses (travel for work) and like each one stocked with basic gear that includes an AR.[/quote]
I was being sarcastic. [/quote]
I understood, sorry.
My comment was meant to be “in agreement with and in addition to” your post and not “in opposition to your post.”
[quote]thethirdruffian wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]thethirdruffian wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Alpha F wrote:
“They don?t believe this was just a spreadsheet. They believe it was a score sheet,” the unidentified career cop told Lupica. “This was the work of a video gamer, and that it was his intent to put his own name at the very top of that list. They believe that he picked an elementary school because he felt it was a point of least resistance, where he could rack up the greatest number of kills. That’s what (the Connecticut police) believe.”
Better ban every gun in Call of Duty so this doesn’t happen again…[/quote]
It’s not guns and it’s not video games. The kids was crazy and this was the route he took.
For the record, I just bought a Sig version of the AR-15 today on a whim, with a really cool optics set up.
Have no plans of going to shoot anyone, but I have several houses (travel for work) and like each one stocked with basic gear that includes an AR.[/quote]
I was being sarcastic. [/quote]
I understood, sorry.
My comment was meant to be “in agreement with and in addition to” your post and not “in opposition to your post.”[/quote]
Gotcha, point taken.
The assault weapons ban is DOA from the Senate Gun Bill…
There’s 30,000 + people killed every year in car accidents. 460,000 + killed by cigarettes or smoking related illness. Alcohol is linked to over 75,000 deaths per year. Obesity related illness claims over 300,000. I could keep going. Gun homicides are only 11,000 per year - and most of them are criminals killing each other. The more dead criminals, the less tax dollars we have to pay to incarcerate them. I fail to see a problem here…
So the “epidemic” that kills the LEAST amount of people (and the one that happens to be Constitutionally protected) is the one that the liberal fuck-tards are going after. Way to think it through, liberal fuck-tards.
I mean seriously, there are FAR BIGGER preventable causes of death than guns. It would actually INCREASE violent crime if guns were made illegal. There are over 350,000,000 guns in the United States. 200,000,000 of which are privately owned. God only knows what percentage is on the “black market” or owned illegally. There is simply NO WAY to put that genie back in the bottle. You might have better luck telling Americans to stop watching reality television. Even if you were somehow able to coerce every law abiding citizen to give up their guns, what have you accomplished? You have effectively emboldened criminals into thinking that they can rob, raid and rape at will with no fear of getting shot. Home invasions, robbery, assault and gun violence among criminals would increase. Why? Because, you stupid liberal fuck-tards, criminals will still have their illegal guns!
Do you think in your naive liberal fuck-tard fantasy that if we repeal the second amendment that 200 MILLION guns will magically disappear? LMAO Do you think that them good ole’ southern boys will say, “Sure officer, here ya go”? Or that Johnny the stick up kid is gonna say, “I was gonna rob that liquor store tomorrow night, but now guns are illegal so here’s my 9mm”? Is that what you think will happen? Let’s say for a moment that you take the firearms from every law abiding citizen (that would never happen, but let’s indulge your stupid liberal infantile fantasy for a minute) what happens when a criminal uses a gun in a crime? What changes? I mean exactly what have you accomplished other than giving a law abiding citizen a means to defend themselves by removing a critical check and balance. Without that check and balance, why would armed criminals worry about getting shot in a home invasion? Why would they hesitate to rob a business owner on the way to the bank? I mean, what can the law abiding citizen do? Call the cops? LMFAO Cuz cops do SUCH a good job at preventing crime, right? Hire more officers and increase patrols? The only thing that will accomplish is move us closer to a police state. And increase the number of crooked cops out there abusing citizens and violating your rights, but wait - if they get rid of the second amendment, what makes you think they’ll stop there? I mean if we’re cutting down on crime, then those pesky rights protecting against illegal search and seizure and free speech and right to assembly should go too, right? I mean they could be DANGEROUS! You start going down that slippery slope you don’t know where it will stop.
Back in the 90’s I was a criminal. I can personally attest to how EASY it was to get a gun. Even now as a convicted felon who’s cleaned up his act, I know at least TEN people who would sell me a gun without batting an eye. I could have a gun in less than an hour with no background check and I don’t even keep in contact with any really bad people anymore. Gun control is fucking WORTHLESS. If someone wants a gun, they can get a gun. Preventing law abiding citizens from having the ability to defend themselves from armed criminals who can easily get guns serves nothing but to endanger American lives.
It SUCKS when some deranged asshole shoots innocent people. Just like it sucks when an 18 wheeler drives into a school bus. Or when people die from poor health choices driven by addiction. But at the end of the day there isn’t a whole lot you can do to “legislate” these unfortunate events away WITHOUT seriously compromising the liberty and freedom that we currently enjoy. I know you liberal fuck-tards can’t wipe your own asses or tie your own shoelaces with out the government telling you the best way to do it and taxing the rest of us for the laces to tie and paper to wipe with, but that’s just because you are weak pieces of shit. You will probably take offense at what I’ve written or ask for links to back the numbers I’ve claimed on this forum post (because you are too lazy to fucking google it). But the rest of you who are not weak liberal fuck-tards won’t take offense at what I’ve written. That’s because you are awesome. America needs to bring back it’s awesomeness or we simply aren’t going to make it much longer.
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
It SUCKS when some deranged asshole shoots innocent people. Just like it sucks when an 18 wheeler drives into a school bus. Or when people die from poor health choices driven by addiction. [/quote]
No, it is not the same
In those cases someone else makes an error and they pay the unfortunate consequences
In the case with guns someone decides to harm others and can do so very effectively
Why does that distinction matter? I have no fucking clue, but just trust that it somehow does? Please? No you say? Oh, you like dead children? That is the cost of your so called “freedoms”, and they come from a bunch of backwards racist wood teeth wearing slave owners anyways… why don’t you join us in the 21st century? Bcuz, those so called “freedoms” you racists talk about all the damn time are obviously obsolete in the future, we don’t need those kinds of associated costs. We have a thing called b e i n g civil, something I know you racists don’t understand. That’s ok, your kids will learn civility soon enough in the new 21st century school systems, it is only a matter of time
jajajaja
[quote]squating_bear wrote:
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
It SUCKS when some deranged asshole shoots innocent people. Just like it sucks when an 18 wheeler drives into a school bus. Or when people die from poor health choices driven by addiction. [/quote]
No, it is not the same
In those cases someone else makes an error and they pay the unfortunate consequences
In the case with guns someone decides to harm others and can do so very effectively
Why does that distinction matter? I have no fucking clue, but just trust that it somehow does? Please? No you say? Oh, you like dead children? That is the cost of your so called “freedoms”, and they come from a bunch of backwards racist wood teeth wearing slave owners anyways… why don’t you join us in the 21st century? Bcuz, those so called “freedoms” you racists talk about all the damn time are obviously obsolete in the future, we don’t need those kinds of associated costs. We have a thing called b e i n g civil, something I know you racists don’t understand. That’s ok, your kids will learn civility soon enough in the new 21st century school systems, it is only a matter of time
jajajaja[/quote]
According to CDC statistics, in 2010, all deaths from firearms were 31,672.
I think you are making this out to be more than it is.
[quote]squating_bear wrote:
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
It SUCKS when some deranged asshole shoots innocent people. Just like it sucks when an 18 wheeler drives into a school bus. Or when people die from poor health choices driven by addiction. [/quote]
No, it is not the same
In those cases someone else makes an error and they pay the unfortunate consequences
In the case with guns someone decides to harm others and can do so very effectively
Why does that distinction matter? I have no fucking clue, but just trust that it somehow does? Please? No you say? Oh, you like dead children? That is the cost of your so called “freedoms”, and they come from a bunch of backwards racist wood teeth wearing slave owners anyways… why don’t you join us in the 21st century? Bcuz, those so called “freedoms” you racists talk about all the damn time are obviously obsolete in the future, we don’t need those kinds of associated costs. We have a thing called b e i n g civil, something I know you racists don’t understand. That’s ok, your kids will learn civility soon enough in the new 21st century school systems, it is only a matter of time
jajajaja[/quote]
LMFAO!!!
You, my weak little liberal fuck-tard, have driven home my point EXACTLY! Thank you, I couldn’t have done it any better myself.
You fucking liberals cant form a single cohesive logical thought in your teeny weeny brains to save your fucking pathetic excuse for a life. You took what I wrote and from that built a strawman argument that I’m a racist and that I like dead children. That’s fucking priceless. I need some of Push’s gold bars right now.
I won’t waste my time addressing any of your bullshit other than your first point - after that your liberal tourettes took over and went off the deep end. You said that in the case with guns, someone can decide to harm others extremely effectively. That’s true, but once someone decides to harm other people, them having a gun or not is MOOT POINT. If you waved your liberal magic wand and made all the evil guns disappear, and someone decided to kill a bunch of people, there are literally HUNDREDS of ways to accomplish that! Drive a U-haul into a school bus or take a battery, a gallon of gasoline, a bucket of laundry detergent and a handfull of nails and you can have your self a BLAST. Literally. There are HUNDREDS of ways to kill a bunch of people. Guns have NOTHING to do with that decision, once it has been made. In fact, if more people were armed, it would increase the likelihood that an armed citizen would be in the proximity of an attack and have the means to stop it.
Now that armed citizen would probably not be a liberal fuck-tard such as yourself, it would require someone with a certain degree of testicular fortitude and a sense of responsibility. And we all know how you fucking liberals cut your nuts off decades ago and couldn’t find a shred of personal responsibility between you if you tried.
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
[quote]squating_bear wrote:
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
It SUCKS when some deranged asshole shoots innocent people. Just like it sucks when an 18 wheeler drives into a school bus. Or when people die from poor health choices driven by addiction. [/quote]
No, it is not the same
In those cases someone else makes an error and they pay the unfortunate consequences
In the case with guns someone decides to harm others and can do so very effectively
Why does that distinction matter? I have no fucking clue, but just trust that it somehow does? Please? No you say? Oh, you like dead children? That is the cost of your so called “freedoms”, and they come from a bunch of backwards racist wood teeth wearing slave owners anyways… why don’t you join us in the 21st century? Bcuz, those so called “freedoms” you racists talk about all the damn time are obviously obsolete in the future, we don’t need those kinds of associated costs. We have a thing called b e i n g civil, something I know you racists don’t understand. That’s ok, your kids will learn civility soon enough in the new 21st century school systems, it is only a matter of time
jajajaja[/quote]
LMFAO!!!
You, my weak little liberal fuck-tard, have driven home my point EXACTLY! Thank you, I couldn’t have done it any better myself.[/quote]
I apologize AC. I was just playin. The way you ended the earlier post made me want to troll you, but looking at it again you were speaking from the heart - so I apologize
I thought I was being funny packing that much crap into only 7 lines. Actually - I sort of still do, but only in an extremely twisted kind of way that I should probably only keep to myself…
[quote] I know you liberal fuck-tards can’t wipe your own asses or tie your own shoelaces with out the government telling you the best way to do it and taxing the rest of us for the laces to tie and paper to wipe with, but that’s just because you are weak pieces of shit. You will probably take offense at what I’ve written or ask for links to back the numbers I’ve claimed on this forum post (because you are too lazy to fucking google it). But the rest of you who are not weak liberal fuck-tards won’t take offense at what I’ve written. That’s because you are awesome. America needs to bring back it’s awesomeness or we simply aren’t going to make it much longer. [/quote]This is the part that indicated to me that you might actually enjoy - was I wrong…?
(you don’t owe me an answer to that in any way shape or form)
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/338607.php#338607
Funny yet true commentary on Jim Carrey’s song which isn’t funny at all.