Great Socialists of Our Time

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

Communism is supposed to be based on at least a willingness of the majority.

I was just saying Jesus was a “from each according to his ability, to each according to his need kind of guy”
[/quote]

Which is a tenet of Communism. That’s the idea of a “commune”.

Not sure what you mean here. Fallacy? Or do you mean problem?

No, I said true Communism would have no government. Socialism is not communism.

Yes, but by having the government be everyone, it is no one, because no one has a stronger say than anyone else, and their is no ruling oligarchy or capitalist class is to direct them what to do.

haha. Hence why Communism fell. That and a lack of supply and demand, which means a whole lot of knives but no bread. I never said it was a good system. I said it’s idealistic.

[quote]
Even in a situation as localized as single plant, socialism facilitates the need for a structured government and probably an authoritative head.

Now try and figure out demand and supply issues for production on a national level where you would have to get everyone from an industry together and try and decide things with no governing authority.

Then try to tackle international issues, where continents are involved.[/quote]

Again, see above. It ends up with a ruling class one way or the other. That’s why it doesn’t work, and so often turns into what it claims to be against- the worker becomes The Man, and then holds down other workers.

Socialism, however, is workable into capitalism. The US, Canada, GB, and many European countries have done it for years.

Again, don’t confuse socialism with communism. They are quite different.

Yes, fallacy, a point in an argument that shows a fundamental flaw in a given logic.

HAH! Don’t throw the socialism vs. communism thing back in my face.

Socialism however was the economic structure of communism which also failed.

I would also say the lack of supply and demand and the deemed knife and bread structure were the economic results of socialism.

I think the bigger flaw in socialism and hence communism is that you need collective agreement on the things that come out of the big pot.

This has been achieved with communism through a class revolution that got people amped up and in agreement (the result of years of abuse and mistreatment). Though the emotion lasted for a time, this ultimately resulted in an all powerful ruling class.

And also with Fascism through the us of authoritative force, thrown in with a quasi mystical beliefs about ancestry and divine right. We all know how this ended. Though it would have been interesting to see how long it could have without the war.

Either way it seems some ongoing near disaster, emotional provocation is necessary to make socialism work for any time at all. I would even say today that recession and global warming are two of the emotional tools at the left’s disposal.

[quote]orion wrote:
If an inherently peaceful religion can be so easily used to lead the masses into war and other abominations, is it not seriously flawed?

[/quote]

Man is seriously flawed. Not the systems.

Hell - in theory communism isn’t a bad idea. But introduce humans to the theory, and it goes to hell real fast.

This is why theory means dick in the real world.

[quote]rainjack wrote:
orion wrote:
If an inherently peaceful religion can be so easily used to lead the masses into war and other abominations, is it not seriously flawed?

Man is seriously flawed. Not the systems.

Hell - in theory communism isn’t a bad idea. But introduce humans to the theory, and it goes to hell real fast.

This is why theory means dick in the real world. [/quote]

Very true.

[quote]orion wrote:
Sloth wrote:
DoubleDuce wrote:
Sloth wrote:
orion wrote:
Sloth wrote:
orion wrote:
DoubleDuce wrote:
orion wrote:
There is exactly one big issue fascists and socialists could never agree one.

Fascists wanted to control the economy by leave the day to day operation to the owners and socialist wanted to nationalize them and run them themselves.

That is about it.

The whole point of the article FI posted seems to be lost to me, unless he wanted to show that yes, indeed, fascism and socialism do have the same roots but manifested themselves differently in each country.

In the case of Germany they happily coexisted with a heavy dose of nationalism and racism. And, surprise those were also collectivist, totalitarian philosophies.

One could also argue that Stalins or Kim Jong-Ils regimes had lots of traits that are considered to be “fascist” by the left.

Like militarism, nationalism, cult of personality, the invention of an outward enemy to create unity within the country and so on.

Fascism, Socialism and Social democracy share many of the same assumptions, and the central assumption is that the collective is more important than the individual.

That ultimately leads to using other people as beasts of burden, no matter how you turn it.

It is modern religion, and the state is their God.

Idolatry if you will.

That is an argument I’ve always found interesting, more so with the Obamessiah talk slinging around.

That the ultimate liberal ideology is an encapsulation of religion, not an abolishment of it.

It certainly manifested itself in Nazism where you saw a merging of socialism, religion, and an all authoritative messiah figure. Kind of the belief that a Utopian, heaven like society is achievable on earth through the power of government.

Thoughts Irish? Care to accuse me of comparing Obama and Hitler? =0)

It is interesting insofar as Christian conservatives are pointing out that “liberals” think that the state has God-like powers and can bring about paradise on earth.

On the other hand they get pissed that “atheists” never waged a jihad because socialism and fascism are religion like.

I am afraid that that is a problem they themselves have to solve.

The religious folk killed and oppressed under state atheism would disagree. I know, I know, socialism (somewhow now a religion) warped their atheist minds. Could Christians then blame the economic and political regimes present at low and bloody points in our history? Fair is fair, after all.

You misrepresent the argument.

I know of no holy war in the name of atheism.

A lot of wars were waged to spread/stop the spread of national socialism, fascism and communism though, and these ideologies undoubtedly have quasi religious motifs as is pointed out by a lot of Christians today.

Now we’re back to quasi religious…Can’t you just admit that the secular and atheist is at least as likely to resort to bloodshed? Is it really painful to do so? I mean, where atheism has had power, state atheism, it’s wielded a bloody sword.

I think the point is that “state atheism” is a brand of religion. Or maybe to some point atheism can be a religion.

Which is kinda funny, because I flipped through a book in a book store the other day on “Atheist Spirituality”.

It sounds to me like the arguement is that atheism, backed or corrupted by force (however you want to phrase it), is religiously inspired.

However, do I as a Christian get to argue that my religion is completely peaceful? That violent episodes in Christian history can be attributed to secular/governmental/this worldly concerns corrupting my religion?

Let’s say, converting the heathens wasn’t so much the goal, as was the grabbing of land and resources? And, my otherwise peaceful religion was actually used by those more concerned with material/this worldy goals?

I don’t know. It’s just that everytime someone says, “Christianity was involved in bloodshed,” pointing to mayhem committed for the sake of atheism is met with “well, that’s actually religions fault, too.”

You could argue that, but what would it help?

If an inherently peaceful religion can be so easily used to lead the masses into war and other abominations, is it not seriously flawed?

[/quote]

Sure, we religious should throw our faith on the rubbish pile. Right on top of such ideas as democracy, liberty, capitalism, defending one’s country, opposition of tyrants, etc., etc. Right ontop of every idea that can be twisted to lead others into war and the carrying out of bloody acts.

Anyways. Speaking of FDR…

“FDR’s policies prolonged Depression by 7 years, UCLA economists calculate.”

[quote]Sloth wrote:
Anyways. Speaking of FDR…

“FDR’s policies prolonged Depression by 7 years, UCLA economists calculate.”
Newsroom | UCLA [/quote]

That’s extremely generous…to FDR. They must be fans.

[quote]dhickey wrote:
Sloth wrote:
Anyways. Speaking of FDR…

“FDR’s policies prolonged Depression by 7 years, UCLA economists calculate.”

That’s extremely generous…to FDR. They must be fans.[/quote]

It’s funny because FDR holds the leftist revisionists under the same spell that Obama does. People deduce utter fantasy out of what they have said and done.

FDR could have been caught naked from the neck down wearing a clown mask with lollipops in his hand on a first grade playground and he would be remembered as the greatest president in US history.

Ideology eradicates evidence every time without hesitation. It just must be that FDR’s policies solved the depression otherwise we lose one of our largest foundation blocks and since we can’t have that he must,ve fixed it with his unconstitutional big government intrusions.

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
FDR could have been caught naked from the neck down wearing a clown mask with lollipops in his hand on a first grade playground and he would be remembered as the greatest president in US history.
[/quote]

Any president that did that would be number 1 in my book.

[quote]malonetd wrote:
Tiribulus wrote:
FDR could have been caught naked from the neck down wearing a clown mask with lollipops in his hand on a first grade playground and he would be remembered as the greatest president in US history.

Any president that did that would be number 1 in my book.[/quote]

Cynthia McKinney may be your best shot at seeing this.

[quote]rainjack wrote:
LBJ, after killing JFK, launched the “Great Society”. If that doesn’t qualify for socialist, I don’t know what does.
[/quote]

Any bets on how long it’ll take for Joe Biden’ His Time to do the same?

[quote]dhickey wrote:
malonetd wrote:
Tiribulus wrote:
FDR could have been caught naked from the neck down wearing a clown mask with lollipops in his hand on a first grade playground and he would be remembered as the greatest president in US history.

Any president that did that would be number 1 in my book.

Cynthia McKinney may be your best shot at seeing this.[/quote]

Ha! Green Party here I come!