You are making a claim of the above that you are basically pulling out of your ass (when usmcc is not smooching it).
I am saying again and for the third time. Did I say that? If so show me where.
Oh and stop with the “we” crap. No one really cares about this nonsense but you.
You said Garland was wrong on all four cases involving gun rights. One of those cases is the criminal sentencing case I referred to. It is one of the four.
If you don’t think he got it wrong, say so.
But you said that I said “Garland was wrong on the criminal sentencing case” and then I asked you to prove it and apparently you can’t.
Tell me do recall what our argument was even about?
And again when did I say the above? Show me.
And when you are done with that assignment you can move right over to the three points that I asked you to address to my satisfaction. You do recall them?
Right now I’m going to go enjoy a thick steak with some mushrooms.
See you in about an hour or so…if it’s 90 minutes I don’t expect to be called a liar. I know how you like to over use that word.
I do expect to return to your lengthy answers
Zeb’s rules for Internet non-debate
#1: The GOP is always right, period.
#2: The DEMs are always wrong, period.
#3: Never use facts. Those require thought.
#4: If someone disagrees with the GOP, insult them.
#5: Use the same insult from #4 repeatedly until your assailant quites. Consider this a GOP win.
#6: Never give a direct answer. Always hedge. You can’t use mental gymnastics if you actually answer a question.
#7: If someone asks you a question ask them a question in return. Refuse to answer first.
#8: When your assailant answers your question play dumb. Pretend to have missed it or say it was an unsatisfactory answer. Claim you answered they’re question.
#9: Always claim victory no matter how badly you’re being destroyed.
#10: Claim the moral high ground while being as patronizing, condescending, and derogatory as possible. No one will notice.
#11 move the goal post as often as possible.
This is hilarious. You’re not smart enough to pull off semantics.
You said Garland got it wrong in all four cases that came before him involving guns. One of those cases is the criminal sentencing case outlined above. Ergo, you believe Garland got it wrong in the criminal sentencing case.
Now tell us why you think Garland got it wrong in the criminal sentencing case.
It would only let me like this once. Outstanding.
“ZOMG SERIOUSLY - this guy actually read the cases! I’m starting to think my rank dishonesty and boorish Behavior is going to give these folks a reason not to vote GOP!!! None of this is in the script! And one guy actually figured out our rules!!! WE’VE BEEN MADE - THIS HAS BACKFIRED WHAT DO I SAY!!!”
You said he was wrong on all four gun-related cases, right?
It is one of the four.
By logical necessity, you believe he was wrong on it.
Don’t you?
Okay back from dinner and what have we here?
Ass Kisser usmcc is back. You slipped a but butt kisser you missed several smooches. I just don’t want you let TB down anymore like that.
Did you give him a big one when you got back?
Sure you did
You planted one right where he likes it 
There you go usmcc your hero has given you a high five, now things are really going your way.
Nice job stay puckered.
Not trying to mister bluster. Just pointing out the fact that I don’t think I said what you are attributing to me. If you want to read more into that go ahead. But you will end up outsmarting yourself.
I never once said what you have claimed that I have said.
You insist on such because you are an egomaniac who claims to be correct all the time and now you’re pulling stuff out of thin air.
If I say that generally Merrick Garland is anti gun does that necessarily mean he was wrong on every case that he decided? And did I say he was wrong on THAT SPECIFIC CASE? Did I…I ask again…
Also, if he was wrong on two of them and correct on the other two, or correct on three of them and wrong on one does that mean he is pro gun? Does that mean that the second amendment is safe with him on the Supreme court?
And while I’m at it in general the most basic question must be answered: Is there someone better than Merrick Garland to serve on the Supreme Court? Someone with a stronger pro gun record and also someone more conservative? A person who is solidly on the side of the 2nd amendment and other issues which concern conservatives (not you) greatly.
Now that’s about all I’m going to say on the Garland topic until you answer the three questions that I put before you.
You can send out your dancing lackey all you want, you can name call (which by the way you are not very good at). But I do want answers to those questions and I want them now before we go any further.
:Hey usmcc do you ever see this 
coming out of TB’s butt? No? Yeah…I could have told you that.
LOL
I really like these 
new emojis that T Nation has supplied. Endless fun…
There ya go using #5 yet again… Boring 
I love how you keep typing “butt”. It’s cute. It’s like you want to be insulting, but you’re also worried your mom might find out you used naugty language.
I’m not what’s important around here junior. You have become the star of the show with your endless butt licks. Now TB is right over there 
go show him how much he really means to you 
Two hours later…
Nope, of course not. Plenty of bullshit, but no answer. Rule #7 and #8.
You should stick with your Alinsky gig, or something else that is already prepared for you. You don’t do well thinking on your own.
I chided you on your memory before but you probably don’t remember (catch that?). I called you an ass kisser several times and will again. But changing it up ads some entertainment value.
Now run along son…