Sorry, Treco - while it’s obvious Zeb is trying to run out the clock by avoidance, I’ve got plenty of time.
I really don’t want you to write 300 words about what a good poster I am, but OK, it’s a deal.
I’ve always found it difficult to write fiction so good luck with that.
2 Likes
SPOILER ALERT: We’ve all been dead the whole time!
1 Like
Ha ha ha hoo hee ha ha oh man thanks for the laugh.
(clears throat) You and I both know that you think you are the smartest thing since Stephen Hawking. In the over 10 years I’ve been hanging around this site I never remember you asking anyone for help in understanding anything…You think you know it all.
Excellent I predicted it and you did it. You didn’t speak directly to me which takes more guts than what you did. But, you did level a negative comment so I would have made money on that bet.
You’re too easy junior
Great if Trump wins you write 300 words on what a great poster I am. If the Pants Suit wins I write 300 words on what a great poster you are.
Done.
I am asking you to help me understand your position - you know, the one that says the Second Amendment should have determined a different outcome in the criminal sentencing case than what Garland reached. Surely you can explain your own position, right?
Where did I say that exactly?
You said Garland decided this case wrongly, and his anti-gun bias was the reason. Well, that’s the only conclusion left.
If that’s not your position, well, then what is your position? Garland got it right?
By the way still waiting for you to defend your lousy political calls TB.
If you were held hostage you would want Joe Biden as your negotiator? Ha ha
You would pick the corrupt Clinton machine to run the US? Uh huh
You don’t think Donald Trump is a good business man?
You really think Hillary is better for the US in “the long and short term”?
When you answer those to my satisfaction I will continue the lesser important debate on Merrick Garland. (like I already have not done that— eye roll)
2 Likes
I like it when you cut and paste it makes you look somehow much smarter than you really are…no small task.
Congrats man
Keep the smooching level to a minimum some may not notice
I already defended all those, at length. At too much length, really. You know this well, you’re just dishonestly pretending I didn’t to set up a reason not to answer my questions re: Garland in a “well, you didn’t answer my questions, why should I answer yours?” evasion.
Why you think that works is amazing to me.,hell, we just covered why Hillary would be better in the short run in this thread, not 50 posts ago. People actually have memories.
So, stop trying to change the subject. I jumped in this thread and discussed Garland with a different poster - you chimed in with your thoughts on the matter and made claims, and made yourself part of the discussion on Garland and his approval. Well, you stepped into the ring, and I expect you to fight.
So, let’s hear it.
The Saul Alinsky stuff is too true. Zeb is probably emailing his precinct in a panic saying “I keep trying the usual misinformation and misdirection stuff on the chat board, but these guys actually read source documents and do research. WHAT SHOULD I DO???”
1 Like
And one more SMOOCH to TB’s ass. 
You’re a good little follower…
