zeb1:
Well, finally you tell the truth. It takes you a while but occasionally you come around. Would I rather have Garland who is by your own admission “soft on the second amendment” or would I rather take a chance on a Trump pick? I’ll take the Trump pick as we both know where Obama is coming from. And if he didn’t have that little wink and a nod talk with Garland before he put his name up I’d be surprised. He not only chose him because he was soft on the second amendment but I am just betting (that means its a guess in case you jump all over the place claiming I am saying its a fact) that he had that little talk with Garland.
Should we rehash the debate about how dishonest of a poster you are?
First post on the topic:
thunderbolt23:
Garland is a moderate/liberal judge, but the hysterics surrounding his “anti-gun” views are just that - hysterics. Well, orchestrated hysterics based on misinformation. Truth is, he doesn’t have a track record in the Second Amendment.
Jesus man, be objective just one time this election cycle, please.
2 Likes
zeb1
July 26, 2016, 5:32pm
226
As TB’s first rate lackey I want to say that you are doing a great job.
And if per chance this position was ever offered as a paid slot I would highly recommend you as no one kisses as better than you!
ZEB
zeb1
July 26, 2016, 5:33pm
227
Should we rehash that the only time you question me (mostly) is when you have your posse with you?..coward!
zeb1
July 26, 2016, 5:34pm
228
Say’s the man who posts how bad Trump is about every 3rd post.
Soooo objective…LOL
You are comical son
Finally? I’ve made that statement since my opening posts on this subject and said it numerous times throughout.
My God, you really are the most dishonest poster we have on PWI.
That said, I’m still wondering if you stand by the fact that Garland got the case I discussed “wrong” and came to an “anti-gun” decision - let’s hear it. Chop chop.
anon50325502:
zeb1:
Well, finally you tell the truth. It takes you a while but occasionally you come around. Would I rather have Garland who is by your own admission “soft on the second amendment” or would I rather take a chance on a Trump pick? I’ll take the Trump pick as we both know where Obama is coming from. And if he didn’t have that little wink and a nod talk with Garland before he put his name up I’d be surprised. He not only chose him because he was soft on the second amendment but I am just betting (that means its a guess in case you jump all over the place claiming I am saying its a fact) that he had that little talk with Garland.
Should we rehash the debate about how dishonest of a poster you are?
First post on the topic:
thunderbolt23:
Garland is a moderate/liberal judge, but the hysterics surrounding his “anti-gun” views are just that - hysterics. Well, orchestrated hysterics based on misinformation. Truth is, he doesn’t have a track record in the Second Amendment.
Jesus man, be objective just one time this election cycle, please.
Also, you won the Internet dollar bet.
1 Like
Such a predictable clown.
anon50325502:
I bet one whole internet dollar that his response will be something along the lines of:
TB, you used to be a good poster, what happened to you? Perhaps, something personal, maybe a divorce…
At any rate, you’ve been exposed as a die hard Hillary supporter so _______________ (insert more blah blah blah nonsense).
Get this, it’s because, objectively, Trump is a dumpster fire outside a daycare center…
2 Likes
zeb1
July 26, 2016, 5:49pm
234
Says the man who dodged the question about supporting Hillary for months on end, while trashing Trump. And then through an extended series of posts between us a few months back you finally admitted she’s be better in the short and long term. And just yesterday echoed similar comments.
You are the king of dishonest posting and in addition to that you are mister reboot when things don’t go your way.
(USMC…I just hit your hero please don’t let him down I want to hear from you.)
zeb1
July 26, 2016, 5:51pm
235
Did you make that up all by yourself or pick it up from MSNBC your favorite channel for news information?
Either way you have no objectivity and you never have.
USMC: “Trump is baaaaaaaaad”
Day after day after day…endlessly.
Not objective boy
Thanks for the clown show again today, Zeb. It’s been a boring day and I knew I could count on my favorite bozo to keep me entertained.
1 Like
zeb1:
Says the man who dodged the question about supporting Hillary for months on end, while trashing Trump. And then through an extended series of posts between us a few months back you finally admitted she’s be better in the short and long term. And just yesterday echoed similar comments.
You are the king of dishonest posting and in addition to that you are mister reboot when things don’t go your way.
(USMC…I just hit your hero please don’t let him down I want to hear from you.)
I didn’t dodge any questions about Hillary because I don’t support her, as I’ve said over and over.
But nice attempt at evasion. Tell me, why did Garland get the case I discussed above (criminal, AK-47) wrong?
1 Like
max13
July 26, 2016, 5:58pm
238
This thread is starting to look like one of the GOP debates. Let’s compare hand sizes gentlemen!
1 Like
Disagree with Zeb one time and you can join in on the fun too.
3 Likes
zeb1
July 26, 2016, 6:34pm
240
And thank you for showing us all once again that you are a first class spineless SUCK UP.
SMOOCH
zeb1
July 26, 2016, 6:36pm
241
Ah but you do support her. By claiming we’d be better off with Hillary both in the short and long term is certainly showing support for her.
And why don’t you just own up to it?
My gosh talk about dishonesty. You are the king of dishonest posts.
zeb1
July 26, 2016, 6:37pm
242
Wrong again boy.
All you have to do is have a record of sucking up to TB repeatedly over a period of time and that will get my attention.
It’s really no wonder you support Donald Trump. Two class A clowns with over inflated egos that just make shit up.
It’s really a shame you get to vote.
1 Like
zeb1:
Ah but you do support her. By claiming we’d be better off with Hillary both in the short and long term is certainly showing support for her.
And why don’t you just own up to it?
My gosh talk about dishonesty. You are the king of dishonest posts.
I support her, but argued she should be prosecuted based on what Comey said?
I am a supporter who wants her indicted. I’m the worst supporter ever.
Stop trying to change the subject. Let’s hear you explain why Garland was wrong.
2 Likes