[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
I think that is Rainjack’s angle these days. Can’t you think of your own mischaracterization?
Nope - just recognizing your appreciation for Lixy’s “ability to make people think” silliness for what it is.
If you got what I said, then you got it. If you didn’t get what I said, then you didn’t. Either is fine. Is there really a need to cry about it all day long?
Who is crying, Vroom? I said your statement meant “absolutely nothing” - and then you came in and started up the “you…you…have too small a brain to get it!” nonsense.
I couldn’t care less about your useless Vroomisms, and you know that. So if I “didn’t get it” when you made your first post and you don’t care whether I “get it or whether I don’t”, why reply to my statement at all? Why get so unnerved that ole “Thunderdolt” didn’t get your “deeper meaning”?
Sounds like you have more vested in it than I do. I thought you had nothing to say and still believe that - others do too, since several asked what the hell it was supposed to mean (or do they "just not get it?). It is you that has come to your own valiant rescue.
Strange, is there a proscribed way that I’m supposed to present my viewpoints. Are there “Thunderdolt’s rules of discourse” that these forums are run by? Maybe when you grow up you’ll realize that people have their own ways of doing things.
Nope - just curious as to why you try and convince us all that you aren’t what you post, when we can all see it. It seems odd - but you don’t have a good explanation. That is fine.
You surely know by now that when the fists start flying I’m happy to jump in the mud and start swinging away just like anyone else.
Yes, you are willing.
Often, if people start talking issues, I’ll revert to discussing issues while that lasts. Hell, I’m sure I’ve thrown my share of first punches around here too.
Actually, Vroom, you are renowned for your ability to start up nonsense and kill threads.
What exactly the fuck are you crying about?
Again, who is crying? We are in the thick of this discussion because you came in to get sniffly over my comment of thinking your post was meaningless - and if you truly don’t care if I “get it or don’t”, why swoop in with all this sniveling commentary?
It is not me that is crying - I am not falling over myself to defend myself from ole Thunderdolt being a big meanie.
If you truly don’t care, then act like you don’t care. Your actions show you seem to care quite a bit.
This is great. Do you realize how stupid you look trying to tell me what I think?
You tell people what to think all the time - you have a monopoly on that I am unaware of?
I do think that some people won’t think for themselves. You can disagree if you like. However, there are some real cheerleaders around these parts… if you hadn’t noticed.
Yes, “cheerleaders” - like Lixy? If there is a definitional exemplar of your much abused phrase “cheerleader”, it is Lixy - ideological, brainlessly devoted to talking points regardless of the information presented, never diverging from a doctrinaire party line, no evidence of independent and original thought…
…he is the quintessential “cheerleader”, but where are the long, windy diatribes about Lixy’s “cheerleader”-ness? Amazingly, you try and yet again position yourself as the post-partisan arbiter of provincial “cheerleader” thinking, yet the only bombs you throw are in the direction of the center-right around these parts.
That doesn’t hurt the center-right’s feelings that you won’t share the “judgment” - rather, it exposes the facade.
Instead, the perfect “cheerleader” - by your definition of mindless devotion to a political school of thought, no matter what - is described by you as “able to make people think”. Yay!
Now, this isn’t about Lixy per se - it is about you being a fraud. You are as partisan as the next poster here, so spare us all the “there are some real cheerleaders around these parts” routine - you are and remain a partisan hack trying to convince us all you are something else.
It makes you look thin-minded and silly - but you don’t care about any of that, remember?
If you don’t consider yourself one of them, that’s great. If you are stepping into the “some people” and getting pissed off about it, that’s your own choice. Blame yourself, not me. I’m going to continue to do what most people do around, voice my opinion.
Oh, I think you should voice your opinion. It is always educational. Just not in the way you hope.
Why should whether or not you particularly like it have any influence on me?
Precisely the question I have been asking myself as to why you bothered to reply to me. If you don’t care so much, why are constantly defending yourself to me?
Do you have an answer?
I talk like that when the situation appears to warrant it. So, perhaps, maybe look to the behavior involved.
It just looks so silly - no one will confuse you with a “tough guy”, Vroom, so the Wyatt Earp-esque “I’ll talk like that if I need to” makes you sound like an idiot.
That is what is meant by “contrived” - it appears fake, forced, and embarrassing.
You jump in to hold Rainjack’s dick, and then the two of you offer tag team support to each other.
Yes, keep going to the well on this, Vroom. It makes you look “really tough”. And we know you are desperate for us to all think that, right?
Glad you find that cute.
Bye, Vroom.[/quote]
This “vroom” character might want to avoid Thunderbolt.
Whoever, “vroom” is, owes me a nickel for that sage advice.
Oh, Thunder, remind me to stay in your good graces.
If the leftists/communists/fundamentalists/bicyclists/muffinmakers/malignant canadians had anyone to rival you, I’d have to leave the board in shame.
JeffR