[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]DJHT wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]DJHT wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]DJHT wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Totenkopf wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]DJHT wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
Fords suck.[/quote]
Are you Jelly?[/quote]
Two things, Camaro beats Mustang and I’ve gotten stuck in the backwoods with a Ford too many times. From the three Chevy’s I have had, not happened once.[/quote]
[/quote]
My '68 Camaro will leave both of those in the dust.[/quote]
I had a 67 mustang that would have left that camero in the dust.
[/quote]
At 13 seconds I would hope so.
My 325 '68 Camaro I would guess runs a sub-10 quarter.[/quote]
Mine had a 351 clevland in it. However when I had this you were still sperm, so really hard to compare now. Love you BC.
[/quote]
I don’t think I was even sperm at that point. Unless you still had it around the winter of 89. The trick is, that I never did work on it (replaced parts when needed and upgraded a little because they don’t make the same stuff) but my father bought it from the dealer brand new, it has to have 500+ hp.[/quote]
Wrecked mine in the summer of 89 rolled it 7 times.[/quote]
Yep, see what happens when you drive Fords. :P[/quote]
If I had been in a chevy I would have died. ![]()
