???
[quote]tootles27 wrote:
CBear84 wrote:
.
HA! At least this pic is actually related to weightlifting.[/quote]
whoa… what are weights?
I should be working right now… Just like last night.
for tootles
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
tootles27 wrote:
CBear84 wrote:
.
HA! At least this pic is actually related to weightlifting.
whoa… what are weights?
[/quote]
hehe…it really doesn’t have to be 5pm somewhere, does it!!!
[quote]CBear84 wrote:
for tootles[/quote]
SO CUTE!!! We have a cat colony outside my apt complex and there is an orange one just like that one. (^:
All kinds o kitteh pics up in here…
1
2
3
3 internet points to who can tell me the blatant fuck up in the following paragraph, and why the people responsible for the letter that contained this should be fired, because now I can’t use this as a resource, because they are retarts.
Disclaimer: Yes I purposely misspelled retart & I used the above paragraph to be obnoxious in another thread, and then noticed the fuck up.
.
.
.
.
That is the fuck what I’m talking about
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
3 internet points to who can tell me the blatant fuck up in the following paragraph, and why the people responsible for the letter that contained this should be fired, because now I can’t use this as a resource, because they are retarts.
The valuation and impairment guidance for securities should be similar to the guidance for loans. Currently there is an inconsistency in the valuation and impairment treatment for securitized loans and unsecuritized loans. The difference in valuing unsecuritized loans and securitized loans was discussed in SFAS 1 15. At that time, the FASB Board recognized that a principal difference between securities and unsecuritized loans is the relatively greater and easier availability of reliable market prices for securities. The current credit market has highlighted that such reliable market prices do not always exist. As such, holders of securitized loans are subject to much harsher valuation requirements and other-than-temporary impairment results even though the underlying collateral is the same.
Disclaimer: Yes I purposely misspelled retart & I used the above paragraph to be obnoxious in another thread, and then noticed the fuck up.[/quote]
Financial Turing test?
super poke!
I heart forts!!