[quote]pat wrote:
[quote]sufiandy wrote:
[quote]pat wrote:
[quote]sufiandy wrote:
Looking at it closely I don’t see how it could be white. There is obviously a tint of blue in the image and nothing outside the dress is blue so its not the lighting making it blue.
Assuming the lighter area is blue, adding more blue to the entire image to compensate for the lighting makes the gold turn black based on its rgb values.[/quote]
Yeah it’s dim. I see no blue whatsoever. Not a shade, not a maybe I don’t see how it can have any blue in it at all.
Yeah, I am sure adding a blue filter will make it look blue, after all it’s white. If we add a red filter it will look red. That’s not the solution.[/quote]
I didn’t say adding blue filter, I meant subtracting light which is a combination of all colors, you’ll get a more blue image by doing that. It might just be your monitor settings. You can also try zooming in so much you see nothing but the blue area, the color is more obvious when everything else is out of frame.
By extracting random pixels on the dress and entering the RGB value on this site it gives you the color name and the hue. Doing this I get nothing but blue themed colors even by picking the lightest (near white) ones I can find.
http://www.color-blindness.com/color-name-hue/[/quote]
Well, what I mean is altering the photo is not going to explain the phenomena. I HAVE zoomed in on that lacy part. It’s brownish gold, zoomed in, zoomed out, period.
I cannot see any blue what so ever and I have not been diagnosed with color blindness. I had it checked not long ago either.[/quote]
I was talking about the white vs blue, zoom in on that and just ignore the gold for now. My explanation for black vs gold depends on first agreeing the other part of the dress is blue.
The part you were zooming in is supposed to be black so of course you won’t see any blue there.

