[quote]GDollars37 wrote:
Lorisco wrote:
GDollars37 wrote:
Lorisco wrote:
You guys are slamming headhunter because he is pushing an unpopular non-PC version of the truth, not because he is wrong. You all follow the crowd so damn much you can’t even think for yourselves.
Maybe there is HIV that causes AIDS and maybe not. But what seems very clear is that the homosexual community, with willing physicians, hyped the chance of getting HIV to the non-gay and non-IV drug using population much more than was scientifically supported.
So with the willing (left) media they overblew this issue on purpose to get funding for AIDS research. They tried to scare the general population making them believe they were at-risk for AIDS in order to get money for their special interest issue. I say “special interest” because millions more people die of heart disease, cancer, and diabetes each year than AIDS. So they lied to get money that would have rightfully gone to diseases that affect a much larger population.
So whether or not HIV is real and causes AIDS is irrelevant. What is relevant is that the AIDS “crisis” was misrepresented from day one. So if the risk was misrepresented it is not inconceivable that the disease itself was misrepresented as well.
But nooo, you guys will continue to go on believing what the media tells you like good little drones.
You sound like a world-class idiot, and are trying to confuse the issue by bringing up a somewhat related, secondary point about the politicization of the disease. Arguing that there is a drug company conspiracy and HIV does not cause AIDS is basically intellectually and morally equivalent to denying the Holocaust: either you’re really stupid/easily persuaded or you allow your hatred for a group of people (gays or Jews) to overpower your reasoning.
Whether straight people are as likely to catch AIDS as gays is a very different issue (and again, look at Africa).
You need to learn to read first, then we can discuss the issue.
I never stated anything about drug companies and conspiracy. My point is that the media and many health care practitioners deliberately exaggerated the chance of a non-gay, non-IV drug using populations’ chances of getting HIV. This is a documented FACT as the info coming out in the media was conflicting with the CDC statistical and medical findings.
You said “Maybe there is HIV that causes AIDS and maybe not.” Then you stuck up for the loon squad by writing “You guys are slamming headhunter because he is pushing an unpopular non-PC version of the truth, not because he is wrong.”
Your somewhat legitimate point about HIV not being as bad for heterosexual men as previously thought is intertwined with the above idiocy.[/quote]
No duffus, the point is that YOU have no scientific proof about HIV or AIDS. He has scientists that disagree with your scientists. So what! So the point is that since neither of you are medical researchers in the area of HIV, neither of you really know anything about it. You are just relying on main-stream media sources for what to believe and he is not. That doesn’t make you more correct than him, or him more than you.
So get over yourself as you really don’t have the foggiest idea of what you are talking abut.