Documentary: The Disappearing Male

Off Topic
281

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]debraD wrote:

Again, I’m just not seeing any demonstration of like contributions to society of ANY kind, so the interest in my womb is ridiculous. And like I said, a pretty serious case of entitlement. Which is a bit funny.
[/quote]

But I dont want to be supported by the products of your womb.

I want to stop supporting other people now I have nothing to do with.

Get it into your head that we do not want the same things.

I can get the things I want out of life without people like you, you cannot get the things out of life you want without people like me.

You just dont recognize it because you let armed men do the dirty work for you.

[/quote]

Right?

I mean she fought for or at the very least supported all these radical changes over the last 40 odd years - burning bras, marches, protests etc.

You got what you wanted: widespread access to abortion, contraception, one-sided divorce courts, equal work opportunity, you name it she got it.

Then when she is asked to give back to society by helping repopulate the country, her response is something to the tune of “Who cares!!! I’ll be dead! What have YOU done?? How many kids do YOU have??”

Sheesh, the system isn’t setup in my favour lady, nor am I constantly living off male provision. Think about what would happen if men suddenly decided we no longer we wanted to be taxed to indirectly ensure your safety.

You’d be fucked. You wouldn’t be able to leave the house without the accompaniment of your father, brother or some other man. If you did, you’d be beaten, raped, killed by all the monsters us are hard-working decent men fight to keep at bay for YOU.

[/quote]

Actually if that were the case my men would have snapped your neck already. Don’t kid yourself, I would be more important than you.

Good to know that the real obstacle between you and the hot women you complain you don’t get to fuck are the rape laws–and the laws preventing their men from kicking your ass.

You know I’ve been arguing with you guys for entertainment but I think you’ve just demonstrated that this isn’t joke and you guys really are animals. I think we can all see the real reason you’re not fitting in with the modern world and the problem is not the feminsts. LOL

Talked about fucked up.

282

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Aussie Davo wrote:

[quote]groo wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Aussie Davo wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

Sheesh, the system isn’t setup in my favour lady, nor am I constantly living off male provision. Think about what would happen if men suddenly decided we no longer we wanted to be taxed to indirectly ensure your safety.

You’d be fucked. You wouldn’t be able to leave the house without the accompaniment of your father, brother or some other man. If you did, you’d be beaten, raped, killed by all the monsters us are hard-working decent men fight to keep at bay for YOU.

[/quote]

Lmfao I hope you aren’t talking about a hypothetical collapse of society situation, because hate to shatter your “im a big strong T MAN” fantasy, but you’d be just as likely to be raped and murdered as she would.

You benefit from the protection of others and cooperative society as much as any woman does.[/quote]

While the chances of victimization would increase for the average guy, it would still be only a fraction of female victimization.

Tell me, if your goal was to victimize someone, would it be easier to target 2 average sized girls walking together or 2 averaged size males walking together?

Even in a mixed group, women would be a liability. They would not be able to fend for themselves if a conflict were to arise.

So no, you’re wrong.

[/quote]

As evidenced by all tradirional societies where the public space is in no way safe and women do not leave their homes without male protection.

Also, even the risk was exactly the same, it is perceived to be much stronger by women.

[/quote]

Are you claiming an age where the public space wasn’t safe was better? It wasn’t only not safe for women it was also a bit rough for little cunts who thought there was a natural right to property. If you want to harken back to an era of might makes right then so be it but its not only women that are in danger there its anyone not willing to do unto others before they do unto them first.

I think women get the benefit of the doubt in many situations where men don’t but thats the breaks. Not being able to bang whoever you want isn’t some societal crisis.
[/quote]

Lmfao this.

This whole thread is basically a bunch of dudes crying about how women want to be more than just their fuck toys.[/quote]

You Sir are an ignorant idiot if that was all you got out of this.

Please continue to be a system supporting bitch, the vaseline is on the second aisle to the left.

Have a nice day Sir.

[/quote]

Well shit bitch, what else is there to get out of this thread? A bunch of dudes trying desperately to define masculinity yet cant even come up with a concise answer that doesn’t invariably boil down to “be rly tuff and make wimmen obey you”?

Because other than that its a bunch of dudes whining about they are hard done by today’s society and they would’ve thrived in < insert dumb ancient society here> and how women should be more respectful because they just dont know man they just dont know how bad theyd get it if society collapsed!!!

Its devolved into irrelevant shit now, even if we could get back on point, it would be for nothing because none of you have yet to explain how men today are lacking anything that men 50 years ago had besides growing up in a society where women are actually encouraged to do something other be a fucktoy or housewife.

283

This is stupid. I want to go back to talking about Batman.

na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na…

284

[quote]xjusticex2013x wrote:
This is stupid. I want to go back to talking about Batman.

na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na…[/quote]

Yes I think this thread has definitely run it’s course now =D

285

[quote]xjusticex2013x wrote:
This is stupid. I want to go back to talking about Batman.

na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na…[/quote]

Hey, leave me out of this mess.

I already said my piece on the subject, back when this still resembled an intelligent and civil discussion.

Edited

286

[quote]batman730 wrote:

[quote]xjusticex2013x wrote:
This is stupid. I want to go back to talking about Batman.

na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na na…[/quote]

Hey, leave me out of this mess.

I already said my piece on the subject, back when this still resembled an intelligent and civil discussion.

Edited[/quote]

I think you meant HHRUGAHGHFHGHAUGHFHGISNTACAR BATMANIMBATMANDOILOOKLIKEACOPFFSDHAF WHURFHGHHHHURGFHGGUTTERALROARWHERESTHETRIGGER

287

I enjoyed this thread. +1. Would recommend.

288

This thread is why kids these days are pussies and the vast majority of adults are too.

More Batman, less banter. If you can’t throw a boomerang/knife through the cordage of bad guys descending the side of the first national bank- GTFO!

289

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:
This thread is why kids these days are pussies and the vast majority of adults are too.

More Batman, less banter. If you can’t throw a boomerang/knife through the cordage of bad guys descending the side of the first national bank- GTFO!
[/quote]

Is Tony Stark a pussy?

290

[quote]LoRez wrote:

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:
This thread is why kids these days are pussies and the vast majority of adults are too.

More Batman, less banter. If you can’t throw a boomerang/knife through the cordage of bad guys descending the side of the first national bank- GTFO!
[/quote]

Is Tony Stark a pussy?[/quote]

Is he the vast majority of adults? NO. Besides, he wouldn’t just throw a batarang, he would create a plasma jet driven, gps/computer guided batarang with infinite range that could be sent on missions by itself.