This guy’s channel is pretty good, if you are so inclined.
I just saw Chris Matthews get tooled on Jeopardy, how that guy is on TV is beyond me.
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Christine wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Christine wrote:
Who have I attacked here, Chuckles?[/quote]
Immature name calling is all. But I’ve learned to expect that sort of thing from you.
Romney had a 4 point bounce in two key must win states. And an over all 3 pt bounce nationwide. Not bad considering that there were only about 5% undecided at that point. Let’s see the sort of bounce that Obama gets after Bill Clinton showed him up.
But I do think Romney has an uphill fight. Not because Obama is so good but because the MSLM is in his hip pocket and have been for four years. If Bush had done half the things Obama did wrong they’d have stormed the White House and strung him up.
Now run along little girl.
Gee, I hope that’s not offensive I know how you lefty’s hate the truth.
[/quote]
Well, chuckles, as far as I can tell, The republican base doesn’t even like him. They will hold their noses and vote for him, but remember the primary races when it was anybody but Romney?[/quote]
Remember the democratic primary races of 2008 when the democrats were split between Obama and Hillary Clinton? Remember when Obama was attacked by those in his own party for not having enough experience for the job?
And then what happened in the general election?
There have been many contentious primaries on both sides. One more example of this is 1980 when George Bush (41) attacked Ronald Reagan relentlessly. It was a very bitter and hard fought primary. Reagan came out on top and then picked Bush to be his VP. Politics is funny like that. But you’d actually have to have a good understanding of political history to appreciate things like this, which you obviously don’t have.
I don’t doubt that Obama will get a bounce from his convention. Romney did as I pointed out in my previous post. This is a very close election and I have no grand illusions that Romney will win and if he does it will be very close.
And I think you are in way over your head every time you enter PWI. Unlike others who post (even some on your side) you have no sense of political history. For that matter honey I don’t really think you understand what’s going on in front of your very nose.
For example, why don’t you give me three good reasons why you feel that Obama deserves to be reelected? All you’ve done so far is accuse Romney of not having passion and making other vague claims against Romney. If Obama is so great it seems that you’d be talking about all his accomplishments. So go ahead sweety give it a shot. Let’s see how much of a compelling case you can make to get your hero reelected.
There might be some heavy lifting here so I would expect you to duck the question.
[/quote]
Can’t compare 2008 to 2012 . Yes, I remember. Still am a Hillary supporter. I don’t think she should run in 2016 though.
The shrinking republican base does not like Romney. I never disliked Obama, I just thought Hillary would make a better POTUS.
I’m not interested in debating policy with you, as you well know. Your fallacious arguements have been well noted.
[quote]Christine wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Christine wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Christine wrote:
Who have I attacked here, Chuckles?[/quote]
Immature name calling is all. But I’ve learned to expect that sort of thing from you.
Romney had a 4 point bounce in two key must win states. And an over all 3 pt bounce nationwide. Not bad considering that there were only about 5% undecided at that point. Let’s see the sort of bounce that Obama gets after Bill Clinton showed him up.
But I do think Romney has an uphill fight. Not because Obama is so good but because the MSLM is in his hip pocket and have been for four years. If Bush had done half the things Obama did wrong they’d have stormed the White House and strung him up.
Now run along little girl.
Gee, I hope that’s not offensive I know how you lefty’s hate the truth.
[/quote]
Well, chuckles, as far as I can tell, The republican base doesn’t even like him. They will hold their noses and vote for him, but remember the primary races when it was anybody but Romney?[/quote]
Remember the democratic primary races of 2008 when the democrats were split between Obama and Hillary Clinton? Remember when Obama was attacked by those in his own party for not having enough experience for the job?
And then what happened in the general election?
There have been many contentious primaries on both sides. One more example of this is 1980 when George Bush (41) attacked Ronald Reagan relentlessly. It was a very bitter and hard fought primary. Reagan came out on top and then picked Bush to be his VP. Politics is funny like that. But you’d actually have to have a good understanding of political history to appreciate things like this, which you obviously don’t have.
I don’t doubt that Obama will get a bounce from his convention. Romney did as I pointed out in my previous post. This is a very close election and I have no grand illusions that Romney will win and if he does it will be very close.
And I think you are in way over your head every time you enter PWI. Unlike others who post (even some on your side) you have no sense of political history. For that matter honey I don’t really think you understand what’s going on in front of your very nose.
For example, why don’t you give me three good reasons why you feel that Obama deserves to be reelected? All you’ve done so far is accuse Romney of not having passion and making other vague claims against Romney. If Obama is so great it seems that you’d be talking about all his accomplishments. So go ahead sweety give it a shot. Let’s see how much of a compelling case you can make to get your hero reelected.
There might be some heavy lifting here so I would expect you to duck the question.
[/quote]
Can’t compare 2008 to 2012 . Yes, I remember. Still am a Hillary supporter. I don’t think she should run in 2016 though.
The shrinking republican base does not like Romney. I never disliked Obama, I just thought Hillary would make a better POTUS.
I’m not interested in debating policy with you, as you well know. Your fallacious arguements have been well noted.
[/quote]
Who said anything about debating policy? I merely asked you to tout Obama’s accomplishments. But I see that instead of taking on that challenge (and it would be a challenge) you ducked the question by claiming to be a Hillary supporter. Now the last time I checked Hillary is not running. So you slam Romney AGAIN, yet do not give the reader any reason to vote for a man that has held the office for four years. You just can’t seem to name just three accomplishments of Obama’s four years in office.
And…I think that just about says it all!
You are sticking to the party line, slam Romney because there isn’t much good you can say about Obama.
Thank you for living up to my expectations.
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Christine wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Christine wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Christine wrote:
Who have I attacked here, Chuckles?[/quote]
Immature name calling is all. But I’ve learned to expect that sort of thing from you.
Romney had a 4 point bounce in two key must win states. And an over all 3 pt bounce nationwide. Not bad considering that there were only about 5% undecided at that point. Let’s see the sort of bounce that Obama gets after Bill Clinton showed him up.
But I do think Romney has an uphill fight. Not because Obama is so good but because the MSLM is in his hip pocket and have been for four years. If Bush had done half the things Obama did wrong they’d have stormed the White House and strung him up.
Now run along little girl.
Gee, I hope that’s not offensive I know how you lefty’s hate the truth.
[/quote]
Well, chuckles, as far as I can tell, The republican base doesn’t even like him. They will hold their noses and vote for him, but remember the primary races when it was anybody but Romney?[/quote]
Remember the democratic primary races of 2008 when the democrats were split between Obama and Hillary Clinton? Remember when Obama was attacked by those in his own party for not having enough experience for the job?
And then what happened in the general election?
There have been many contentious primaries on both sides. One more example of this is 1980 when George Bush (41) attacked Ronald Reagan relentlessly. It was a very bitter and hard fought primary. Reagan came out on top and then picked Bush to be his VP. Politics is funny like that. But you’d actually have to have a good understanding of political history to appreciate things like this, which you obviously don’t have.
I don’t doubt that Obama will get a bounce from his convention. Romney did as I pointed out in my previous post. This is a very close election and I have no grand illusions that Romney will win and if he does it will be very close.
And I think you are in way over your head every time you enter PWI. Unlike others who post (even some on your side) you have no sense of political history. For that matter honey I don’t really think you understand what’s going on in front of your very nose.
For example, why don’t you give me three good reasons why you feel that Obama deserves to be reelected? All you’ve done so far is accuse Romney of not having passion and making other vague claims against Romney. If Obama is so great it seems that you’d be talking about all his accomplishments. So go ahead sweety give it a shot. Let’s see how much of a compelling case you can make to get your hero reelected.
There might be some heavy lifting here so I would expect you to duck the question.
[/quote]
Can’t compare 2008 to 2012 . Yes, I remember. Still am a Hillary supporter. I don’t think she should run in 2016 though.
The shrinking republican base does not like Romney. I never disliked Obama, I just thought Hillary would make a better POTUS.
I’m not interested in debating policy with you, as you well know. Your fallacious arguements have been well noted.
[/quote]
Who said anything about debating policy? I merely asked you to tout Obama’s accomplishments. But I see that instead of taking on that challenge (and it would be a challenge) you ducked the question by claiming to be a Hillary supporter. Now the last time I checked Hillary is not running. So you slam Romney AGAIN, yet do not give the reader any reason to vote for a man that has held the office for four years. You just can’t seem to name just three accomplishments of Obama’s four years in office.
And…I think that just about says it all!
You are sticking to the party line, slam Romney because there isn’t much good you can say about Obama.
Thank you for living up to my expectations.[/quote]
Typical. You may have the last word. I have not slammed Romney here. Unless you really believe that my musing that romney lacks passion is some sort of attempt at a slam? If you do, you really are pretty thin skinned.
You brought up 2008 attempting to make some sort of connection. The democrat’ts fight was contentious, but in the end, full and enthusiastic support was for Obama.
[quote]Christine wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Christine wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Christine wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Christine wrote:
Who have I attacked here, Chuckles?[/quote]
Immature name calling is all. But I’ve learned to expect that sort of thing from you.
Romney had a 4 point bounce in two key must win states. And an over all 3 pt bounce nationwide. Not bad considering that there were only about 5% undecided at that point. Let’s see the sort of bounce that Obama gets after Bill Clinton showed him up.
But I do think Romney has an uphill fight. Not because Obama is so good but because the MSLM is in his hip pocket and have been for four years. If Bush had done half the things Obama did wrong they’d have stormed the White House and strung him up.
Now run along little girl.
Gee, I hope that’s not offensive I know how you lefty’s hate the truth.
[/quote]
Well, chuckles, as far as I can tell, The republican base doesn’t even like him. They will hold their noses and vote for him, but remember the primary races when it was anybody but Romney?[/quote]
Remember the democratic primary races of 2008 when the democrats were split between Obama and Hillary Clinton? Remember when Obama was attacked by those in his own party for not having enough experience for the job?
And then what happened in the general election?
There have been many contentious primaries on both sides. One more example of this is 1980 when George Bush (41) attacked Ronald Reagan relentlessly. It was a very bitter and hard fought primary. Reagan came out on top and then picked Bush to be his VP. Politics is funny like that. But you’d actually have to have a good understanding of political history to appreciate things like this, which you obviously don’t have.
I don’t doubt that Obama will get a bounce from his convention. Romney did as I pointed out in my previous post. This is a very close election and I have no grand illusions that Romney will win and if he does it will be very close.
And I think you are in way over your head every time you enter PWI. Unlike others who post (even some on your side) you have no sense of political history. For that matter honey I don’t really think you understand what’s going on in front of your very nose.
For example, why don’t you give me three good reasons why you feel that Obama deserves to be reelected? All you’ve done so far is accuse Romney of not having passion and making other vague claims against Romney. If Obama is so great it seems that you’d be talking about all his accomplishments. So go ahead sweety give it a shot. Let’s see how much of a compelling case you can make to get your hero reelected.
There might be some heavy lifting here so I would expect you to duck the question.
[/quote]
Can’t compare 2008 to 2012 . Yes, I remember. Still am a Hillary supporter. I don’t think she should run in 2016 though.
The shrinking republican base does not like Romney. I never disliked Obama, I just thought Hillary would make a better POTUS.
I’m not interested in debating policy with you, as you well know. Your fallacious arguements have been well noted.
[/quote]
Who said anything about debating policy? I merely asked you to tout Obama’s accomplishments. But I see that instead of taking on that challenge (and it would be a challenge) you ducked the question by claiming to be a Hillary supporter. Now the last time I checked Hillary is not running. So you slam Romney AGAIN, yet do not give the reader any reason to vote for a man that has held the office for four years. You just can’t seem to name just three accomplishments of Obama’s four years in office.
And…I think that just about says it all!
You are sticking to the party line, slam Romney because there isn’t much good you can say about Obama.
Thank you for living up to my expectations.[/quote]
Typical. You may have the last word. I have not slammed Romney here. Unless you really believe that my musing that romney lacks passion is some sort of attempt at a slam? If you do, you really are pretty thin skinned.
You brought up 2008 attempting to make some sort of connection. The democrat’ts fight was contentious, but in the end, full and enthusiastic support was for Obama.
[/quote]
One more post by you and one more time that you failed to point out just three big accomplishments of the Obama administration and why people should vote for him based on all of his successes.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
This guy’s channel is pretty good, if you are so inclined.[/quote]
This video took place in Hollywood, on Sunset Blvd, VERY Liberal place. This area is WAY FAR LEFT.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
This guy’s channel is pretty good, if you are so inclined.[/quote]
This video took place in Hollywood, on Sunset Blvd, VERY Liberal place. This area is WAY FAR LEFT.[/quote]
You’ll like this one.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
This guy’s channel is pretty good, if you are so inclined.[/quote]
This video took place in Hollywood, on Sunset Blvd, VERY Liberal place. This area is WAY FAR LEFT.[/quote]
You’ll like this one.[/quote]
What do you expect? Btween the liberal College’s and the fact that the majority of 18-23 year olds get their news from Jon Stewart doesn’t leave much hope for that group.
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
This guy’s channel is pretty good, if you are so inclined.[/quote]
This video took place in Hollywood, on Sunset Blvd, VERY Liberal place. This area is WAY FAR LEFT.[/quote]
You’ll like this one.[/quote]
What do you expect? Btween the liberal College’s and the fact that the majority of 18-23 year olds get their news from Jon Stewart doesn’t leave much hope for that group.[/quote]
Funny you mention that. The dude in the second video has another where he shows an email from the daily show that says, in plain english “we don’t book conservative pundents”.
But Stewart will bash Fox all day.
I’ll say one thing, Fox headline right now: Violence in Mid East. NBC Headline: Starving Polar bears.
I shit you not.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
Funny you mention that. The dude in the second video has another where he shows an email from the daily show that says, in plain english “we don’t book conservative pundents”.
But Stewart will bash Fox all day.
I’ll say one thing, Fox headline right now: Violence in Mid East. NBC Headline: Starving Polar bears.
I shit you not.[/quote]
Doesn’t he have O’Reilly on frequently?
[quote]smh23 wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
Funny you mention that. The dude in the second video has another where he shows an email from the daily show that says, in plain english “we don’t book conservative pundents”.
But Stewart will bash Fox all day.
I’ll say one thing, Fox headline right now: Violence in Mid East. NBC Headline: Starving Polar bears.
I shit you not.[/quote]
Doesn’t he have O’Reilly on frequently?[/quote]
No idea. I know he has been on Bill’s show. Both their shows pander too much for me.
I find Stewart funny, and think he is a smart dude. I just get irked by the “faux news” people that think they are informed by watching the daily show…
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
This guy’s channel is pretty good, if you are so inclined.[/quote]
This video took place in Hollywood, on Sunset Blvd, VERY Liberal place. This area is WAY FAR LEFT.[/quote]
You’ll like this one.[/quote]
Beans,
If you had ANY idea how bad this problem is, the sissification of our kids, you would fall over.
Liberals got smart, they proposition ideas as being “uber-cool and hip” and being like soooooooo chic.
They have turned California from the 5th largest economy to the 10th, along with a $648 Billion total debt. Yes, almost 3/4 Trillion.
^
It’s a song about California I thought you might like. Particularly Hollywood and L.A.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
This guy’s channel is pretty good, if you are so inclined.[/quote]
This video took place in Hollywood, on Sunset Blvd, VERY Liberal place. This area is WAY FAR LEFT.[/quote]
You’ll like this one.[/quote]
What do you expect? Btween the liberal College’s and the fact that the majority of 18-23 year olds get their news from Jon Stewart doesn’t leave much hope for that group.[/quote]
Funny you mention that. The dude in the second video has another where he shows an email from the daily show that says, in plain english “we don’t book conservative pundents”.
But Stewart will bash Fox all day.
I’ll say one thing, Fox headline right now: Violence in Mid East. NBC Headline: Starving Polar bears.
I shit you not.[/quote]
The American people are funny sometimes when there is chaos abroad (against the US) people rally around the President. I can see how Obama’s policies or lack thereof have lead us down this road. Yet, I wonder over the next few days how the American people will react.
[quote]ZEB wrote:
The American people are funny sometimes when there is chaos abroad (against the US) people rally around the President. I can see how Obama’s policies or lack thereof have lead us down this road. Yet, I wonder over the next few days how the American people will react. [/quote]
There is nothing to rally around man, and you know that as well as I do.
There was no fucking security in Lybia. A war torn country who is still very much in the throws of anarchy, and the American citizen serving not only his country but the people of that country is left unprotected… I weep for the families, because they are faced with the harsh reality that their son, father, husband was left to die by the very same country he lived to serve.
I just… I don’t know… The saddest part of all this: there was a TV show on with an exploited 6 year old in a fashion show, so a majority of American’s don’t have to envision their son being the one left out for the slaughter.
I have a question President Obama if you’re not too busy that is. Can you tell us why, with 48 hours notice you were unable to prevent a United States Ambassador from being anally raped, lynched and dragged through the streets in yet another sickening Islamo-snuff film? And can you tell us if there is any connection between your massive cuts to the military and the complete abscence of Marines in the Benghazi consulate? It seems like the two things might be connected somehow.
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
They want to government out of their womb right?[/quote]
Except when they want it IN their womb.[/quote]
I know you won’t hear me but they do not want it in their wombs, would you want it in your ass ?
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
They want to government out of their womb right?[/quote]
Except when they want it IN their womb.[/quote]
I know you won’t hear me but they do not want it in their wombs, would you want it in your ass ?
[/quote]
When Obama and the democrats pushed health care down the throats of the Americans (most who didn’t want it) they also demanded that we pay for birth control for women. I know most of this stuff is over your head. But even you can understand the irony of a woman wanting to control her own womb yet at the same time asking for help from strangers for free birth control.
Chew on that a while dumbo.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
ZEB wrote:
The American people are funny sometimes when there is chaos abroad (against the US) people rally around the President. I can see how Obama’s policies or lack thereof have lead us down this road. Yet, I wonder over the next few days how the American people will react.
There is nothing to rally around man, and you know that as well as I do.[/quote]
You are looking at the reality of the situation and I certainly agree with every word of your scenario. However, when it comes to politics reality takes a back seat, it always has. If the American people feel that there are enemies abroad who are berating us they sometimes rally around the President. That is just a fact of life. Does Obama deserve it HELL NO! He deserves to have his ass booted out of office. But that’s not how the typical American may view this most recent Obama debacle. Especially in light of the fact that the MSLM has painted a very different picture than what is the reality of the situation. As I said many months ago with the MSLM in his back pocket Obama has a really good chance of getting reelected.
People only know what they are told and they’re being lied to daily!