Oh no they called a female escort service! Who would ever have thought of having sex with a woman? Whether the records are released or not, nobody on that list should be condemned.
Hmmm…pissing off a lot of powerful people. I would NOT want to be her life insurance carrier.
She should have sold the stuff, then announced it. She might have gotten away with all this then…
Hope she has time to kiss her ass goodbye.
[quote]
BostonBarrister wrote:
No fraud – she’s not lying about the records. The underlying assumption may be correct or incorrect, but unless she’s warrantying that they were used for prostitution, whether they were or not is just an assumption made by the buyer.
lucasa wrote:
I’m sure you’re probably right, I just mean to clarify. Her plea is in no way warrantying the solicitous nature of the phone calls?[/quote]
Not unless she has a horrible lawyer drafting it…
[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
I will offer an answer: I am fine with prostitution being illegal, and the state does have an obligation to protect the morality of its citzenry.
States have an interest not just in liberty, but ordered liberty. [/quote]
Unfortunately, state craft as soul craft has not seemed to pan out very well.
Perhaps because we have accepted liberal representative democracy as our system, or because human beings are a certain way, it seems that laws often exacerbate the problems they purport to solve. Drug and prostitution laws immediately spring to mind.
While I’m certainly not in favor of a libertarian free-for-all, I think we may be better served in other ways.