Could Bill O'Reilly Pass Economics 101?

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

Allow me to connect the dots for you since your purposeful coyness is a place you love to go and hide when pretending not to understand the overall point because it proves your ideology is a fraud. [/quote]

Lol, lets connect those dots:

You make a bunch of wild assertions.

I ask for specifics

You call me dumb

I ask you again

You say I’m pretending and a fraud, because I want you to back up what you said…

Sound about right?

Um no, we’re still trying to figure out if your assertions hold water. We can’t do that because you can’t list a single specific example, fact or figure to back up your claims.

My assertion is as follows: You got caught spouting talking points that you can’t back up with facts, figures or numbers.

Depends on where the cuts are, and how they are allocated.

But I’ll be general just like you: the people who receive government transfers from the programs that have their funding cuts, or the employees of those programs, maybe both.

It does make a difference and you know it.

Why do you always avoid questions, only to ask them yourself?

I find it ironic that when viewing 1950s-1970’s news or sports reels how eloquent and fluent so many African Americans were able to express themselves and this in a time when they supposedly had so much to overcome. Now that they are in every American arena and have hundreds of college courses that exam every aspect of “the black experience” how appropriately ignorant and intolerant they come across.

I suspect it comes from the unrighteous punishment they wish to exact on those whites today who had nothing to do with any wrong dealt against their ancestors and the reward they wish to reap on behalf of wrongs never inflicted upon blacks today.


The free handouts, phones, food stamps, welfare, etc… when does it end? How many more decades?

Connect the dots to when the United States no longer is granted loans and every bank account and retirement fund is confiscated to repay all the filth that was handed away to those who wish to be counted as victims of racism for eternity.

http://blog.heritage.org/2013/03/18/low-income-or-filthy-rich-cyprus-residents-to-have-bank-accounts-raided/

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
O’Reily is a conservative talk show hero and usually is in tandem with conservative ideology. People actually believe this dolt.
[/quote]

Why Would you say the most watched (this includes, CBS,ABC,NBC,CNN,MSNBC) commentator, an attorney, and widely successful author is a dolt?

Anybody that will go on a liberal “worship forum” like The View as a guest and be man enough to make Joyless Behar and Whoopi Goldberg walk off their own show is NOT A DOLT.

P.S. In keeping with earlier post about minority Hispanics & blacks teaming together in Democratic party - time will tell which minority will take over the Democratic party:

[quote]conservativedog wrote:
I find it ironic that when viewing 1950s-1970’s news or sports reels how eloquent and fluent so many African Americans were able to express themselves and this in a time when they supposedly had so much to overcome. Now that they are in every American arena and have hundreds of college courses that exam every aspect of “the black experience” how appropriately ignorant and intolerant they come across.

I suspect it comes from the unrighteous punishment they wish to exact on those whites today who had nothing to do with any wrong dealt against their ancestors and the reward they wish to reap on behalf of wrongs never inflicted upon blacks today.[/quote]

Ignorant and intolerant, you say?

Well, you certainly have more expertise in matters of ignorance and intolerance than most.

[quote]conservativedog wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
O’Reily is a conservative talk show hero and usually is in tandem with conservative ideology. People actually believe this dolt.
[/quote]

Why Would you say the most watched (this includes, CBS,ABC,NBC,CNN,MSNBC) commentator, an attorney, and widely successful author is a dolt?

Anybody that will go on a liberal “worship forum” like The View as a guest and be man enough to make Joyless Behar and Whoopi Goldberg walk off their own show is NOT A DOLT.

P.S. In keeping with earlier post about minority Hispanics & blacks teaming together in Democratic party - time will tell which minority will take over the Democratic party:

[/quote]

Why would I say O’Reilly is a dolt? Because he goes on TV and spouts lie after lie without any truth or factual evidence to back it up.

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

Allow me to connect the dots for you since your purposeful coyness is a place you love to go and hide when pretending not to understand the overall point because it proves your ideology is a fraud. [/quote]

Lol, lets connect those dots:

You make a bunch of wild assertions.

I ask for specifics

You call me dumb

I ask you again

You say I’m pretending and a fraud, because I want you to back up what you said…

Sound about right?

Um no, we’re still trying to figure out if your assertions hold water. We can’t do that because you can’t list a single specific example, fact or figure to back up your claims.

My assertion is as follows: You got caught spouting talking points that you can’t back up with facts, figures or numbers.

Depends on where the cuts are, and how they are allocated.

But I’ll be general just like you: the people who receive government transfers from the programs that have their funding cuts, or the employees of those programs, maybe both.

It does make a difference and you know it.

Why do you always avoid questions, only to ask them yourself?[/quote]

Here is an article on social spending cuts. But I guess this isn’t true because they haven’t cited the particular program number to suffice for you.

<div style="width: 420px; padding: 10px; background-color: #a2a276;">
  <img style="max-width: 420px; height: 300px;"
       src="http://www.deemir.com/create/photos/20130201/101250_8748291_3334054953.jpg">
  <br>
$142,000 , 5 bedrooms, 4 full baths,
      0 half baths, 3,296 square feet
</div>
<br>
mark | (239) 370-2130
5732 Maggiore Trl, Zellwood, FL
Large Property on One Acre at a GREAT price
5BR/4BA Single Family House
offered at $142,000
Year Built 1985
Sq Footage 3,296
Bedrooms 5
Bathrooms 4 full, 0 partial
Floors 2
Parking Unspecified
Lot Size 37,866 sqft
HOA/Maint $0 per month

DESCRIPTION

CASH OFFERS ONLY ... PRICE IS FIRM

Coming Soon To Market: Nestled in the small town of Zellwood within the quiet community of Maggiore Estates, surrounded by lush landscaping is this exquisite 5 Bedroom 4 bathroom dream house with an oversized 2 car attached garage that's priced approximately 60k below market value. If the INSTANT EQUITY in this property doesn't make your mouth water than the 3,184sq ft. of living space and the 4,650 lot will.

This stunning house features tile floors throughout. The large living room boasts a brick fireplace which can also be seen from the formal dining room. Bathrooms are very nice with unique touches. The extra-large kitchen offers a tremendous amount of cabinet space, eating area and a center island for additional counter space. On the 2nd floor, walk through French Doors onto your sun-deck which is featured off of the grand Master Suite. The spacious backyard which sits on almost an acre lot is surrounded by trees and healthy foliage that will sooth your soul with just one look.

5732 Maggiore Trail is perfect for a large family looking for a STEAL at almost 60k below market value. This house is perfect for the family who wants to customize the details and make this property a warm and loving home for years to come. Enjoy this INSTANT EQUITY today and this home for years to come.

For more info please Call Mark (239) 877-1962

IMPORTANT INFO: The Seller of this property currently has Equitable Interest in this property and is accepting offers on this property as a CONTRACT FOR DEED which is contingent upon the Sellers successful closing with HUD within the next 30-45 days, before the property can/will be resold to a buyer. Buyer will receive clear, unencumbered and marketable title to the property only after the Seller takes full possession of the property from HUD. Call Mark (239) 877-1962

All information contained in this advertisement is believed to be reliable and accurate but is not guaranteed or warranted. All pertinent information is to be independently verified by buyer. Lot size & room measurements are approximate.

** Seller is in no way representing, affiliated with, associated with, an agent of, working with, acting on behalf of or in any way related to or working for/with RED PIG REALTY or any Real Estate Brokerage, Company or Agency, that has previously or is currently under contract with HUD or HUD's representative as the listing Agent/Brokerage hired to represent this property.
Zellwood
see additional photos below
PROPERTY FEATURES

- Breakfast nook - Dining room - Family room
- Laundry room - Living room - Master bath
- Walk-in closet - Balcony, Deck, or Patio - Yard
- Central A/C - Garage - Attached - Fireplace

ADDITIONAL PHOTOS


Front view

Photo 2

Photo 3

Photo 4

Photo 5

Photo 6

Photo 7

Photo 8

Photo 9

Photo 10

Photo 11
Contact info:
mark
(239) 370-2130
For sale by individual owner

Posted: Apr 2, 2013, 12:32pm PDT

[quote]smh23 wrote:

[quote]conservativedog wrote:
I find it ironic that when viewing 1950s-1970’s news or sports reels how eloquent and fluent so many African Americans were able to express themselves and this in a time when they supposedly had so much to overcome. Now that they are in every American arena and have hundreds of college courses that exam every aspect of “the black experience” how appropriately ignorant and intolerant they come across.

I suspect it comes from the unrighteous punishment they wish to exact on those whites today who had nothing to do with any wrong dealt against their ancestors and the reward they wish to reap on behalf of wrongs never inflicted upon blacks today.[/quote]

Ignorant and intolerant, you say?

Well, you certainly have more expertise in matters of ignorance and intolerance than most.[/quote]

Thanks for the hello friend. I do mean friend but you kill more conversations than a bad wi-fi connection.

The poor habitually elect Democrats… yet they are still POOR.

My statements are true. You cannot help the poor by destroying conservatives. You cannot strengthen the weak minorities by weakening conservatism. Prosperity will not come by raising the minimum wage, inciting poor against rich. You cannot build character and courage by giving out free Obama phones, free Obama healthcare, free housing, and free food stamps/ebt.

The overwhelming hatred of the things that built this nation are now showing up as high poverty levels in all liberal run cities and states. They are a total failure asking for more of what made them that way.

Let your men marry men. Your women marry women. Abort all of your babies if you wish. It will not make you anything but weak.

Stop watching cheerleader run TV by the Rachel Maddows & Joyless Behars of your party. They will come for your bank accounts (as the powers that be seized them in Cypress from rich and poor)the same as they come for our guns which would can & will be used to defend OUR property.

Friend I wish you would change your mind about what you hold to be true.

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

Allow me to connect the dots for you since your purposeful coyness is a place you love to go and hide when pretending not to understand the overall point because it proves your ideology is a fraud. [/quote]

Lol, lets connect those dots:

You make a bunch of wild assertions.

I ask for specifics

You call me dumb

I ask you again

You say I’m pretending and a fraud, because I want you to back up what you said…

Sound about right?

Um no, we’re still trying to figure out if your assertions hold water. We can’t do that because you can’t list a single specific example, fact or figure to back up your claims.

My assertion is as follows: You got caught spouting talking points that you can’t back up with facts, figures or numbers.

Depends on where the cuts are, and how they are allocated.

But I’ll be general just like you: the people who receive government transfers from the programs that have their funding cuts, or the employees of those programs, maybe both.

It does make a difference and you know it.

Why do you always avoid questions, only to ask them yourself?[/quote]
NEW YORK CITY â?? No one in New York City knows exactly how much local social services will be cut back due to the federal budget sequester which went into effect March 1.

However, as the federal cuts take effect over the coming months, budgets for many state, city and private social service agencies that help vulnerable populations will be impacted.

The sequester was designed by Congress to cut spending across nearly every area of the federal budget.

When it began to take effect last Friday, it sent state and city governments, which depend in part on federal funding, and private sector social service agencies that receive federal grants, scrambling for ways to make up a projected shortfall.

â??It ainâ??t going to be good. That we know for sure,â?? says David Rivel of the Jewish Board of Family and Children Services, which serves 30,000 New Yorkers every year with addiction counseling, homeless services, transportation for the developmentally disabled, mental health care and violence prevention education.

Rivel says many clients need help in more than one of these areas, and a stressor in one aspect of life may increase the need for help in another.

â??There are many people who are leading lives on the edge and if you push in any one place in the system, you are going to have impacts in other places," he says. "So a modest impact in terms of a reduced housing allowance could throw a family into crisis; it could mean they are homeless; it could mean they have a greater demand for mental services. It could mean that instances of domestic violence which were under control, now come out again because people are stressed out from pressures in their life.â??

United Neighborhood Houses of New York protesting budget cuts that affect disadvantaged children and Head Start school programs. The same services could also be hurt by the sequester. (United Neighborhood Houses of New York )
â??â??Sequestration could also threaten funding for Head Start, a popular federal program which provides education programs for young children, ages three to five, living at or below the poverty line.

Cutbacks would be especially catastrophic for New York City children, according to Nancy Wackstein of United Neighborhood Houses of New York, an umbrella association for 38 community centers and social service agencies, especially since state and city education budgets have already been slashed drastically in recent years.

â??I think everybody in the United States has a stake in whether our children do well in school," Wackstein says, "whether they are going to graduate from high school, whether they are going to be able to succeed in the global marketplace. And so what you are doing is cutting yourself off at the knees here.â??

Wackstein also fears for New Yorkers who are depending on federal funds to recover from Hurricane Sandy, which flooded the low-lying coastal areas of the city last October where many low income families live.

â??There is still recovery going on in many communities," she says. "People living in public housing were really hard hit here. There are a lot of people who were struggling before Sandy, Sandy made it worse and now, if programs and services get cut back even more, it will be even worse for them. So this couldnâ??t come at a worse time.â??

Other federally funded programs which could be affected in New York include $1.5 million dollars in meal money for the elderly, $5.7 million for the prevention and treatment of substance addiction, and $12.9 million dollars to promote good water and air quality.

There are also an estimated 12,000 defense department workers in the New York area who may lose part of their income due to furloughs.

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

Allow me to connect the dots for you since your purposeful coyness is a place you love to go and hide when pretending not to understand the overall point because it proves your ideology is a fraud. [/quote]

Lol, lets connect those dots:

You make a bunch of wild assertions.

I ask for specifics

You call me dumb

I ask you again

You say I’m pretending and a fraud, because I want you to back up what you said…

Sound about right?

Um no, we’re still trying to figure out if your assertions hold water. We can’t do that because you can’t list a single specific example, fact or figure to back up your claims.

My assertion is as follows: You got caught spouting talking points that you can’t back up with facts, figures or numbers.

Depends on where the cuts are, and how they are allocated.

But I’ll be general just like you: the people who receive government transfers from the programs that have their funding cuts, or the employees of those programs, maybe both.

It does make a difference and you know it.

Why do you always avoid questions, only to ask them yourself?[/quote]

Here is an article on social spending cuts. But I guess this isn’t true because they haven’t cited the particular program number to suffice for you.

<div style="width: 420px; padding: 10px; background-color: #a2a276;">
  <img style="max-width: 420px; height: 300px;"
       src="http://www.deemir.com/create/photos/20130201/101250_8748291_3334054953.jpg">
  <br>
$142,000 , 5 bedrooms, 4 full baths,
      0 half baths, 3,296 square feet
</div>
<br>
mark | (239) 370-2130
5732 Maggiore Trl, Zellwood, FL
Large Property on One Acre at a GREAT price
5BR/4BA Single Family House
offered at $142,000
Year Built 1985
Sq Footage 3,296
Bedrooms 5
Bathrooms 4 full, 0 partial
Floors 2
Parking Unspecified
Lot Size 37,866 sqft
HOA/Maint $0 per month

DESCRIPTION

CASH OFFERS ONLY ... PRICE IS FIRM

Coming Soon To Market: Nestled in the small town of Zellwood within the quiet community of Maggiore Estates, surrounded by lush landscaping is this exquisite 5 Bedroom 4 bathroom dream house with an oversized 2 car attached garage that's priced approximately 60k below market value. If the INSTANT EQUITY in this property doesn't make your mouth water than the 3,184sq ft. of living space and the 4,650 lot will.

This stunning house features tile floors throughout. The large living room boasts a brick fireplace which can also be seen from the formal dining room. Bathrooms are very nice with unique touches. The extra-large kitchen offers a tremendous amount of cabinet space, eating area and a center island for additional counter space. On the 2nd floor, walk through French Doors onto your sun-deck which is featured off of the grand Master Suite. The spacious backyard which sits on almost an acre lot is surrounded by trees and healthy foliage that will sooth your soul with just one look.

5732 Maggiore Trail is perfect for a large family looking for a STEAL at almost 60k below market value. This house is perfect for the family who wants to customize the details and make this property a warm and loving home for years to come. Enjoy this INSTANT EQUITY today and this home for years to come.

For more info please Call Mark (239) 877-1962

IMPORTANT INFO: The Seller of this property currently has Equitable Interest in this property and is accepting offers on this property as a CONTRACT FOR DEED which is contingent upon the Sellers successful closing with HUD within the next 30-45 days, before the property can/will be resold to a buyer. Buyer will receive clear, unencumbered and marketable title to the property only after the Seller takes full possession of the property from HUD. Call Mark (239) 877-1962

All information contained in this advertisement is believed to be reliable and accurate but is not guaranteed or warranted. All pertinent information is to be independently verified by buyer. Lot size & room measurements are approximate.

** Seller is in no way representing, affiliated with, associated with, an agent of, working with, acting on behalf of or in any way related to or working for/with RED PIG REALTY or any Real Estate Brokerage, Company or Agency, that has previously or is currently under contract with HUD or HUD's representative as the listing Agent/Brokerage hired to represent this property.
Zellwood
see additional photos below
PROPERTY FEATURES

- Breakfast nook - Dining room - Family room
- Laundry room - Living room - Master bath
- Walk-in closet - Balcony, Deck, or Patio - Yard
- Central A/C - Garage - Attached - Fireplace

ADDITIONAL PHOTOS


Front view

Photo 2

Photo 3

Photo 4

Photo 5

Photo 6

Photo 7

Photo 8

Photo 9

Photo 10

Photo 11
Contact info:
mark
(239) 370-2130
For sale by individual owner

Posted: Apr 2, 2013, 12:32pm PDT

[/quote]

I made a copy.

I speak for many when I say we are all tired of “gotcha” moments in journalism and it is discouraging. I merely print yours as an example.

What’s happening in our homeland is not going to heal and you will only see the hatred worsen. Please try not to strengthen that.

So… The mighty sources are (brace yourself)

  1. gibberish code
  2. an unlinked copy/paste from an unnamed source about the sequester

So can we just agree to agree your talking points are bunk at this point?

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
So… The mighty sources are (brace yourself)

  1. gibberish code
  2. an unlinked copy/paste from an unnamed source about the sequester

So can we just agree to agree your talking points are bunk at this point? [/quote]

Wrong copy and paste, big deal!

Bottom line, when you cut social programs you take money out of the pockets of those who would end up spending it all. This lessens demand which in turn slows the economy.

Austerity has this effect. It is mostly republicans who are spearheading this policy. As a percentage of the population it is minorities who get more government assistance. They may only make up a minority of the overall population but as a group get more government assistance. Republicans believe it isn’t this which is stopping minorities from voting for them so they take the position it isn’t their policy it is only the way they are talking about the policies that are the problem.

You deny this because A.) it goes against your ideology and B.) It gives you cover by trying to be pinpoint the specific believing this makes a difference. You hide in the micro while denying the macro. Even though anywhere austerity is practiced it fails. You try to reach for any excuse to deny reality which makes you look like that idiot O’Reilly. It is your choice to live in the fantasy land of your ideology and hide under the excuse that a numbered program has not been disclosed and then you say that does make a difference but do not supply us with anything factual to back it up. You have a fondness of accusing others of not providing information but do the same yourself.

Where can you tell us where cutting social services are helping the economy? Anywhere in the world? I can save you some time by telling you it hasn’t happened because it doesn’t work. But it is more important to you to deny reality because you are more concerned with whose side is winning instead of the truth.

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
So… The mighty sources are (brace yourself)

  1. gibberish code
  2. an unlinked copy/paste from an unnamed source about the sequester

So can we just agree to agree your talking points are bunk at this point? [/quote]

Wrong copy and paste, big deal!

Bottom line, when you cut social programs you take money out of the pockets of those who would end up spending it all. This lessens demand which in turn slows the economy.

Austerity has this effect. It is mostly republicans who are spearheading this policy. As a percentage of the population it is minorities who get more government assistance. They may only make up a minority of the overall population but as a group get more government assistance. Republicans believe it isn’t this which is stopping minorities from voting for them so they take the position it isn’t their policy it is only the way they are talking about the policies that are the problem.

You deny this because A.) it goes against your ideology and B.) It gives you cover by trying to be pinpoint the specific believing this makes a difference. You hide in the micro while denying the macro. Even though anywhere austerity is practiced it fails. You try to reach for any excuse to deny reality which makes you look like that idiot O’Reilly. It is your choice to live in the fantasy land of your ideology and hide under the excuse that a numbered program has not been disclosed and then you say that does make a difference but do not supply us with anything factual to back it up. You have a fondness of accusing others of not providing information but do the same yourself.

Where can you tell us where cutting social services are helping the economy? Anywhere in the world? I can save you some time by telling you it hasn’t happened because it doesn’t work. But it is more important to you to deny reality because you are more concerned with whose side is winning instead of the truth.[/quote]

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
So… The mighty sources are (brace yourself)

  1. gibberish code
  2. an unlinked copy/paste from an unnamed source about the sequester

So can we just agree to agree your talking points are bunk at this point? [/quote]

Wrong copy and paste, big deal!

Bottom line, when you cut social programs you take money out of the pockets of those who would end up spending it all. This lessens demand which in turn slows the economy.

Austerity has this effect. It is mostly republicans who are spearheading this policy. As a percentage of the population it is minorities who get more government assistance. They may only make up a minority of the overall population but as a group get more government assistance. Republicans believe it isn’t this which is stopping minorities from voting for them so they take the position it isn’t their policy it is only the way they are talking about the policies that are the problem.

You deny this because A.) it goes against your ideology and B.) It gives you cover by trying to be pinpoint the specific believing this makes a difference. You hide in the micro while denying the macro. Even though anywhere austerity is practiced it fails. You try to reach for any excuse to deny reality which makes you look like that idiot O’Reilly. It is your choice to live in the fantasy land of your ideology and hide under the excuse that a numbered program has not been disclosed and then you say that does make a difference but do not supply us with anything factual to back it up. You have a fondness of accusing others of not providing information but do the same yourself.

Where can you tell us where cutting social services are helping the economy? Anywhere in the world? I can save you some time by telling you it hasn’t happened because it doesn’t work. But it is more important to you to deny reality because you are more concerned with whose side is winning instead of the truth.[/quote]

Zep,

You asked where cutting social services has helped an economy, I will tell you where, right here dude. We had a $17 Billion deficit, and Brown cut services and raised taxes on the rich, and increased the sales tax.

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
So… The mighty sources are (brace yourself)

  1. gibberish code
  2. an unlinked copy/paste from an unnamed source about the sequester

So can we just agree to agree your talking points are bunk at this point? [/quote]

Wrong copy and paste, big deal!

Bottom line, when you cut social programs you take money out of the pockets of those who would end up spending it all. This lessens demand which in turn slows the economy.

Austerity has this effect. It is mostly republicans who are spearheading this policy. As a percentage of the population it is minorities who get more government assistance. They may only make up a minority of the overall population but as a group get more government assistance. Republicans believe it isn’t this which is stopping minorities from voting for them so they take the position it isn’t their policy it is only the way they are talking about the policies that are the problem.

You deny this because A.) it goes against your ideology and B.) It gives you cover by trying to be pinpoint the specific believing this makes a difference. You hide in the micro while denying the macro. Even though anywhere austerity is practiced it fails. You try to reach for any excuse to deny reality which makes you look like that idiot O’Reilly. It is your choice to live in the fantasy land of your ideology and hide under the excuse that a numbered program has not been disclosed and then you say that does make a difference but do not supply us with anything factual to back it up. You have a fondness of accusing others of not providing information but do the same yourself.

Where can you tell us where cutting social services are helping the economy? Anywhere in the world? I can save you some time by telling you it hasn’t happened because it doesn’t work. But it is more important to you to deny reality because you are more concerned with whose side is winning instead of the truth.[/quote]

Zep,

You asked where cutting social services has helped an economy, I will tell you where, right here dude. We had a $17 Billion deficit, and Brown cut services and raised taxes on the rich, and increased the sales tax.

http://articles.latimes.com/2012/jan/07/local/la-me-state-budget-20120107[/quote]

Read the article. Where does it say the economy is doing better and picking up? I don’t see that anywhere in this article.

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
So… The mighty sources are (brace yourself)

  1. gibberish code
  2. an unlinked copy/paste from an unnamed source about the sequester

So can we just agree to agree your talking points are bunk at this point? [/quote]

Wrong copy and paste, big deal!

Bottom line, when you cut social programs you take money out of the pockets of those who would end up spending it all. This lessens demand which in turn slows the economy.

Austerity has this effect. It is mostly republicans who are spearheading this policy. As a percentage of the population it is minorities who get more government assistance. They may only make up a minority of the overall population but as a group get more government assistance. Republicans believe it isn’t this which is stopping minorities from voting for them so they take the position it isn’t their policy it is only the way they are talking about the policies that are the problem.

You deny this because A.) it goes against your ideology and B.) It gives you cover by trying to be pinpoint the specific believing this makes a difference. You hide in the micro while denying the macro. Even though anywhere austerity is practiced it fails. You try to reach for any excuse to deny reality which makes you look like that idiot O’Reilly. It is your choice to live in the fantasy land of your ideology and hide under the excuse that a numbered program has not been disclosed and then you say that does make a difference but do not supply us with anything factual to back it up. You have a fondness of accusing others of not providing information but do the same yourself.

Where can you tell us where cutting social services are helping the economy? Anywhere in the world? I can save you some time by telling you it hasn’t happened because it doesn’t work. But it is more important to you to deny reality because you are more concerned with whose side is winning instead of the truth.[/quote]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection[/quote]

You still have yet to answer my question. Just reflected it by referring to Freud. Keep avoiding the main thrust of this post because you have to reach further and further into fantasy land.

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

You still have yet to answer my question. Just reflected it by referring to Freud. Keep avoiding the main thrust of this post because you have to reach further and further into fantasy land.[/quote]

Dude, you are a complete joke.

I have, even without you posting a single specific example of your assertion, or any sort of provable fact, destroyed your enitre arguement.

Now you say I’m avoiding?

Please tell me you are a googlebot and not a live person that takes themselves serious at this point.

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
So… The mighty sources are (brace yourself)

  1. gibberish code
  2. an unlinked copy/paste from an unnamed source about the sequester

So can we just agree to agree your talking points are bunk at this point? [/quote]

Wrong copy and paste, big deal!

Bottom line, when you cut social programs you take money out of the pockets of those who would end up spending it all. This lessens demand which in turn slows the economy.

Austerity has this effect. It is mostly republicans who are spearheading this policy. As a percentage of the population it is minorities who get more government assistance. They may only make up a minority of the overall population but as a group get more government assistance. Republicans believe it isn’t this which is stopping minorities from voting for them so they take the position it isn’t their policy it is only the way they are talking about the policies that are the problem.

You deny this because A.) it goes against your ideology and B.) It gives you cover by trying to be pinpoint the specific believing this makes a difference. You hide in the micro while denying the macro. Even though anywhere austerity is practiced it fails. You try to reach for any excuse to deny reality which makes you look like that idiot O’Reilly. It is your choice to live in the fantasy land of your ideology and hide under the excuse that a numbered program has not been disclosed and then you say that does make a difference but do not supply us with anything factual to back it up. You have a fondness of accusing others of not providing information but do the same yourself.

Where can you tell us where cutting social services are helping the economy? Anywhere in the world? I can save you some time by telling you it hasn’t happened because it doesn’t work. But it is more important to you to deny reality because you are more concerned with whose side is winning instead of the truth.[/quote]

Zep,

You asked where cutting social services has helped an economy, I will tell you where, right here dude. We had a $17 Billion deficit, and Brown cut services and raised taxes on the rich, and increased the sales tax.

http://articles.latimes.com/2012/jan/07/local/la-me-state-budget-20120107[/quote]

Read the article. Where does it say the economy is doing better and picking up? I don’t see that anywhere in this article.
[/quote]

Didn’t you hear ? California is BACK, I mean it’s B-A-C-K, Paul Krugman said so. Oh shit, I just saw a pink unicorn crap a turd of money…

New York Times columnist Paul Krugman has hitched his boat to the failing Titanic that is the state of California. Declaring the state in a state of â??comeback,â?? Krugman wrote this week, â??reports of the stateâ??s demise proved premature. Unemployment in California remains high, but itâ??s coming down â?? and thereâ??s a projected budget surplus, in part because the implosion of the stateâ??s Republican Party finally gave Democrats a big enough political advantage to push through some desperately needed tax increases.â??

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

You still have yet to answer my question. Just reflected it by referring to Freud. Keep avoiding the main thrust of this post because you have to reach further and further into fantasy land.[/quote]

Dude, you are a complete joke.

I have, even without you posting a single specific example of your assertion, or any sort of provable fact, destroyed your enitre arguement.

Now you say I’m avoiding?

Please tell me you are a googlebot and not a live person that takes themselves serious at this point.[/quote]

You have completely ignored the main thrust of the post because you cannot refute it. Then you turn around and accuse people of the very thing that you do. You are weak and pathetic.

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
So… The mighty sources are (brace yourself)

  1. gibberish code
  2. an unlinked copy/paste from an unnamed source about the sequester

So can we just agree to agree your talking points are bunk at this point? [/quote]

Wrong copy and paste, big deal!

Bottom line, when you cut social programs you take money out of the pockets of those who would end up spending it all. This lessens demand which in turn slows the economy.

Austerity has this effect. It is mostly republicans who are spearheading this policy. As a percentage of the population it is minorities who get more government assistance. They may only make up a minority of the overall population but as a group get more government assistance. Republicans believe it isn’t this which is stopping minorities from voting for them so they take the position it isn’t their policy it is only the way they are talking about the policies that are the problem.

You deny this because A.) it goes against your ideology and B.) It gives you cover by trying to be pinpoint the specific believing this makes a difference. You hide in the micro while denying the macro. Even though anywhere austerity is practiced it fails. You try to reach for any excuse to deny reality which makes you look like that idiot O’Reilly. It is your choice to live in the fantasy land of your ideology and hide under the excuse that a numbered program has not been disclosed and then you say that does make a difference but do not supply us with anything factual to back it up. You have a fondness of accusing others of not providing information but do the same yourself.

Where can you tell us where cutting social services are helping the economy? Anywhere in the world? I can save you some time by telling you it hasn’t happened because it doesn’t work. But it is more important to you to deny reality because you are more concerned with whose side is winning instead of the truth.[/quote]

Zep,

You asked where cutting social services has helped an economy, I will tell you where, right here dude. We had a $17 Billion deficit, and Brown cut services and raised taxes on the rich, and increased the sales tax.

http://articles.latimes.com/2012/jan/07/local/la-me-state-budget-20120107[/quote]

Read the article. Where does it say the economy is doing better and picking up? I don’t see that anywhere in this article.
[/quote]

Didn’t you hear ? California is BACK, I mean it’s B-A-C-K, Paul Krugman said so. Oh shit, I just saw a pink unicorn crap a turd of money…

New York Times columnist Paul Krugman has hitched his boat to the failing Titanic that is the state of California. Declaring the state in a state of â??comeback,â?? Krugman wrote this week, â??reports of the stateâ??s demise proved premature. Unemployment in California remains high, but itâ??s coming down â?? and thereâ??s a projected budget surplus, in part because the implosion of the stateâ??s Republican Party finally gave Democrats a big enough political advantage to push through some desperately needed tax increases.â??

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/04/03/Krugman-CA-great[/quote]

So the thrust of your arguement is that cutting social services works in California. But somehow it fails in Europe, Canada etc.?