[quote]Petedacook wrote:
Sloth wrote:
JustTheFacts wrote:
Sloth wrote:
Apparently you’re not reading me correctly. My time frame doesn’t fall between 10-12 seconds. My time is AT LEAST 12.5s. Again, AT LEAST. Reread it all again. You obviously skimmed. At second 12, I give the remaining floors only 1 second to fall. AS I said, that’s just not possible.
Watch the video, it makes your argument completely laughable when you emphasize “AT LEAST 12.5s”–since in reality it would be 40 seconds to NEVER.
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/march2007/080307nist.htm
You appear to be looking for the most complicated answer to a fundamental impossibility. You could prove me wrong of course by running thru a series of 20 closed doors at almost the exact same speed as if they were open. Or better yet, do the 100 meter hurdles at your 100 meter sprint time.
Hah, nice dodge! I invite anyone to listen for the roar of the collapse initialization towards the top of the building(btw, didn’t even factor speed of sound to mic). And then view how much is still standing at the 12 second mark. Right there, at least 11.5 seconds have passed, with that much building still left. Would Jones have us believe it took .5s for the rest to collapse?
One more time, I said at least 12.5s for a reason. That’s because I used a ridiculous collapse time for the remaining building, at the 12 second mark…1 sec. Are you arguing that it took a mere 1 sec for the rest to collapse?
Do you know the number 1 republican campaign contirbutor up to the 2000 elections?
That’s right idiot, it was ENRON.
I suppose you also know that ALL of the evidence against ENRON and the GOVT. involvement with ENRON and the contributions was stored in WTC 4, the last building to fall, which was not hit by any fucking thing. NOTHING DOUCHE!
All evidence was lost in the collapse of that building.
And you have absolutely no reason to question this? NONE? No reason to request an independent investigation. INDEPENDENT, not a bunch of BUSH croneys.
My advice to you, keep sucking dick my friend. Jesus will sort you out.
Yea, and by the way I work for the company that analyzed the data from ENRON, Onsite Sourcing. And the data was lost in WTC building 4 collapse.
Look it up, I am sure you know ZERO about it.
Yet you proclaim the studies of paid hit men.
Brillaint. I won sustody of my son. My son’s mother appealed and paid over 5 psychiatrists to testify in court why she should have custody of my son.
I suppose in your mind, she should have custody of my son, and I am wrong. After all, I couldn’t even pay one psychologist to testify on my behalf. So the professionals that testify for her win, and I lose since I couldn’t afford one testimony.
So my son needs to go to my mother, and you need your balls cut off so you cannot contaminate the rest of the population.
Seem fair? [/quote]
Ok, I missed this post when I responded to your proceeding post directed at me. Now, I’m going to say something very ugly, but sincerely. Perhaps, you do need some mental help. If you’re wondering how I could be such an evil S.O.B to say so, do the following. Reread your both of your responses a couple of times.
What a frothing at the mouth, way over the top, disproportionate response. I think the worst thing I’ve said to you is the you made a pathetic response to a point I raised. Now, I did just fire off a cult likening to you and Ct’ers because of you calling me a Sodomite.
More of a little jab as I withdrew from any conversation with you. But, that was before I noticed this post. About sucking your “dick,” and cutting my balls off.
In the end, I don’t harbor any real ill feelings for you, and that’s the truth. You’ve done me no real harm with your reply. But, I’d ask yourself if this is an all too common reaction in your life .