Clint Eastwood

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
81

[quote]pittbulll wrote:
@ Beans both sides have strategists and the Republicans have it all over the Democrats especially in RE: to money[/quote]

I was taking you moderately seriously until you made that comment. Rather than make assertions of my own, I would suggest that you take a moment to review the biggest contributors to the Obama campaign (including his own numerous SuperPAC supporters – yes, that’s also in the previous election when nobody even knew the term SuperPAC), both in this election and in 2008.

Also kindly note the margin by which Obama out-spent McCain in 2008. Just a preview to what you will hopefully read for yourself – that war chest did NOT come from students and housewives sending in $20 via paypal.

To imagine that Republicans are entirely supported by big business and the ultra-rich, while Democrats are entirely supported by the ‘little guy’ is factually unsupportable.

82

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]JEATON wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:
http://www.hulu.com/watch/397329?playlist_id=1031

I know I should not post this here because the ethical stands here are beyond reproach . This is second place I posted this Jon Stewart show , he has reporters go into the convention to look for Minorities . One of my favorite comedy segments I have seen him do [/quote]

Classic…Jon Stewart the shill for the DNC at the RNC trying to make them look bad.

I’M SO SHOCKED!

Oh my gosh what will we ever do now?

LOL Pittski you take the cake.

You post more dumb crap around here than anyone with the exception of HH.[/quote]

HH is professional grade shit stirrer.

Pitt is simply a card carrying member of the nitwit society. I often wonder if he grew up in a house with lots and lots of lead paint chips.
[/quote]

You are so original . I wonder what you all would think if you had a Democrat that was as rabid as the some of the Republicans [/quote]

It would be a lot calmer, probably drink sweat tea and whiskey on the porch a discuss politics like human beings with some sort of hospitality toward each other instead of froth at the mouth all day.[/quote]

Need alike button
[/quote]

Of course, the Dem would have to stop frothing at the mouth for this to happen. I live in the Bible Belt, I am a Catholic Evangelist (I live amongst the most anti-Catholic people I have ever met). I don’t sell politics, I sell religion. If there was a time for someone to come unhinged it would be talking to me…most are Republicans and I’ve yet to meet a raised voice. Though, I turn to a fellow Democrat and I get my head bit off.[/quote]

Face book is all I have to go on :slight_smile: the only Rabid comments I get are Republicans . The Democrats all though opinionated ,they are polite and allow difference in opinion . If you post something the Republicans don’t like they attack with the vengeance of a rabid dog , and these are good people [/quote]

OK now with that comment, I just know you’re mildly delusional. I apologize for taking you seriously enough in my previous post to have ever written you a sincere comment.

83

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Face book is all I have to go on :slight_smile: the only Rabid comments I get are Republicans . The Democrats all though opinionated ,they are polite and allow difference in opinion . If you post something the Republicans don’t like they attack with the vengeance of a rabid dog , and these are good people [/quote]

Dude, their are moron’s and intelligent people on both sides.

Please don’t post “upworth” shit here and talk about Dems being open minded and civil. Most of the shit they call “facts” are as legit as a gay marriage in Texas.

[/quote]

OK if you promise no more FAUX news

84

[quote]LHT wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:
@ Beans both sides have strategists and the Republicans have it all over the Democrats especially in RE: to money[/quote]

I was taking you moderately seriously until you made that comment. Rather than make assertions of my own, I would suggest that you take a moment to review the biggest contributors to the Obama campaign (including his own numerous SuperPAC supporters – yes, that’s also in the previous election when nobody even knew the term SuperPAC), both in this election and in 2008.

Also kindly note the margin by which Obama out-spent McCain in 2008. Just a preview to what you will hopefully read for yourself – that war chest did NOT come from students and housewives sending in $20 via paypal.

To imagine that Republicans are entirely supported by big business and the ultra-rich, while Democrats are entirely supported by the ‘little guy’ is factually unsupportable. [/quote]

I think he was simply referring to the size of their war chests relative to each other. Obama has not outraised Romney for months, and he is not going to over the course of the remaining election season. The Republican cause will raise and spend significantly more money this cycle.

85

[quote]Makavali wrote:
In a piece of damning evidence, I’ve uncovered a picture of Obama, with KARL MARX.[/quote]

:slight_smile:

86

[quote]smh23 wrote:

[quote]LHT wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:
@ Beans both sides have strategists and the Republicans have it all over the Democrats especially in RE: to money[/quote]

I was taking you moderately seriously until you made that comment. Rather than make assertions of my own, I would suggest that you take a moment to review the biggest contributors to the Obama campaign (including his own numerous SuperPAC supporters – yes, that’s also in the previous election when nobody even knew the term SuperPAC), both in this election and in 2008.

Also kindly note the margin by which Obama out-spent McCain in 2008. Just a preview to what you will hopefully read for yourself – that war chest did NOT come from students and housewives sending in $20 via paypal.

To imagine that Republicans are entirely supported by big business and the ultra-rich, while Democrats are entirely supported by the ‘little guy’ is factually unsupportable. [/quote]

I think he was simply referring to the size of their war chests relative to each other. Obama has not outraised Romney for months, and he is not going to over the course of the remaining election season. The Republican cause will raise and spend significantly more money this cycle.[/quote]

I don’t know how else could you interpret it

87

Obama did out raise Romney in August 114 million to 111 million.

I think I heard that on MSNBC so it must be true right Pittski?

As long as it isn’t FOX News it has to be true. Because FOX news is baaaaaaaad. They don’t like Obama so they are not to be trusted.

Pitt you are a total idiot.

88

[quote]ZEB wrote:

As long as it isn’t FOX News it has to be true. Because FOX news is baaaaaaaad. They don’t like Obama so they are not to be trusted.

[/quote]

Anyone who doesn’t look over the Fox website is a fool. They report things other news channels don’t, and in the very least give coverage to things other stations pass over.

Then, like anyone with a brain, you read the article and judge it on its merit, not where it was published.

89

So can we now talk about how Obama is trying to buy the election ?

90

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Obama did out raise Romney in August 114 million to 111 million.

I think I heard that on MSNBC so it must be true right Pittski?

As long as it isn’t FOX News it has to be true. Because FOX news is baaaaaaaad. They don’t like Obama so they are not to be trusted.

Pitt you are a total idiot.

[/quote]

Fuck you Zeb , check pacs and super pacs

91

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Obama did out raise Romney in August 114 million to 111 million.

I think I heard that on MSNBC so it must be true right Pittski?

As long as it isn’t FOX News it has to be true. Because FOX news is baaaaaaaad. They don’t like Obama so they are not to be trusted.

Pitt you are a total idiot.

[/quote]

Fuck you Zeb , check pacs and super pacs
[/quote]

The republicans have more money in the pacs no question. But, I don’t think that there is any question that MSNBC, CBS, NBC, CNN, ABC, Time Magazine, The New York Times and the rest of the liberal media MORE than out weigh the pacs in tilting this race for Obama.

92

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Obama did out raise Romney in August 114 million to 111 million.

I think I heard that on MSNBC so it must be true right Pittski?

As long as it isn’t FOX News it has to be true. Because FOX news is baaaaaaaad. They don’t like Obama so they are not to be trusted.

Pitt you are a total idiot.

[/quote]

Fuck you Zeb , check pacs and super pacs
[/quote]

The republicans have more money in the pacs no question. But, I don’t think that there is any question that MSNBC, CBS, NBC, CNN, ABC, Time Magazine, The New York Times and the rest of the liberal media MORE than out weigh the pacs in tilting this race for Obama.

[/quote]

You make a fair point, but in terms of tangible assets (money raised by Romney, RNC, pro-Romney PACs) the Republicans win.

93

Money doesn’t mean shit.

Each person has one vote.

If you think I am lying, ask Meg Whitman, she spent almost $200 million of her own money and lost to Jerry Brown as Governor of California.

94

[quote]smh23 wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Obama did out raise Romney in August 114 million to 111 million.

I think I heard that on MSNBC so it must be true right Pittski?

As long as it isn’t FOX News it has to be true. Because FOX news is baaaaaaaad. They don’t like Obama so they are not to be trusted.

Pitt you are a total idiot.

[/quote]

Fuck you Zeb , check pacs and super pacs
[/quote]

The republicans have more money in the pacs no question. But, I don’t think that there is any question that MSNBC, CBS, NBC, CNN, ABC, Time Magazine, The New York Times and the rest of the liberal media MORE than out weigh the pacs in tilting this race for Obama.

[/quote]

You make a fair point, but in terms of tangible assets (money raised by Romney, RNC, pro-Romney PACs) the Republicans win.[/quote]

I did not see the Movie but I heard it was a hatchet job on Obama

95

[quote]Makavali wrote:
In a piece of damning evidence, I’ve uncovered a picture of Obama, with KARL MARX.[/quote]

LOL :slight_smile:

96

[quote]Makavali wrote:
In a piece of damning evidence, I’ve uncovered a picture of Obama, with KARL MARX.[/quote]

Ok. Ok. I’ll have to give you this one. Well done.

97

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:
In a piece of damning evidence, I’ve uncovered a picture of Obama, with KARL MARX.[/quote]

Ok. Ok. I’ll have to give you this one. Well done.[/quote]

I do what I must for my adoring fans.

98

[quote]Makavali wrote:
In a piece of damning evidence, I’ve uncovered a picture of Obama, with KARL MARX.[/quote]

Nice!

99

[quote]Makavali wrote:
In a piece of damning evidence, I’ve uncovered a picture of Obama, with KARL MARX.[/quote]

Gold.

Moral of this story? Don’t let people over the age of 75 do improv right before a speech that can make or break your run for election.

LOL. I already know not to let my grandfather host the Grammys.

100

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:
In a piece of damning evidence, I’ve uncovered a picture of Obama, with KARL MARX.[/quote]

I swear, I will be an old old man and still think this joke is funny.[/quote]I don’t get it. I’m bein serious.