You don’t have to own a business to understand how business works. As a matter of fact a lot of business owners have no clue how “business” works. [/quote]
I would say success is the bench mark .
[/quote]
Sure. That doesn’t change the fact that some very successful businessmen have no idea how “business” works. They pay people for that. [/quote]
I would disagree , if they started their business, Maybe if they inherited their business .
I say success is the bench mark .
I would like to hear you defend that every idiot that get a degree is intelligent
[/quote]
Who said every person that get’s a degree is intelligent?[/quote]
Having a degree doesn’t make you intelligent. It isn’t uncommon to meet someone with a degree who is dumb as fuck. I have a degree and don’t think I’m more or less intelligent necessarily than someone without one.
Owning a business doesn’t make you intelligent. It is not even remotely hard to start some businesses and many people who think they can do it. I’ve operated my Dad’s business while he was in the hospital. It’s not that complicated. Many people who “own” a business today may be broke in 5 years from that business. Happens all the time in America.
Also intelligence is very subjective. I’ve met people who I know are book smart as hell who seem like mouth breathing morons when it comes to common sense. At the same time I have friends who make more money than I do and successfully operate businesses who were lucky to graduate high school (largely from laziness).
You don’t have to own a business to understand how business works. As a matter of fact a lot of business owners have no clue how “business” works. [/quote]
I would say success is the bench mark .
[/quote]
Sure. That doesn’t change the fact that some very successful businessmen have no idea how “business” works. They pay people for that. [/quote]
I would disagree , if they started their business, Maybe if they inherited their business .
I say success is the bench mark .
I would like to hear you defend that every idiot that get a degree is intelligent
[/quote]
Who said every person that get’s a degree is intelligent?[/quote]
Having a degree doesn’t make you intelligent. It isn’t uncommon to meet someone with a degree who is dumb as fuck. I have a degree and don’t think I’m more or less intelligent necessarily than someone without one.
Owning a business doesn’t make you intelligent. It is not even remotely hard to start some businesses and many people who think they can do it. I’ve operated my Dad’s business while he was in the hospital. It’s not that complicated. Many people who “own” a business today may be broke in 5 years from that business. Happens all the time in America.
Also intelligence is very subjective. I’ve met people who I know are book smart as hell who seem like mouth breathing morons when it comes to common sense. At the same time I have friends who make more money than I do and successfully operate businesses who were lucky to graduate high school (largely from laziness). [/quote]
Careful H, with that line of reasoning you just might end up an honorary member of our club.
You don’t have to own a business to understand how business works. As a matter of fact a lot of business owners have no clue how “business” works. [/quote]
I would say success is the bench mark .
[/quote]
Sure. That doesn’t change the fact that some very successful businessmen have no idea how “business” works. They pay people for that. [/quote]
I would disagree , if they started their business, Maybe if they inherited their business .
I say success is the bench mark .
I would like to hear you defend that every idiot that get a degree is intelligent
[/quote]
Who said every person that get’s a degree is intelligent?[/quote]
Having a degree doesn’t make you intelligent. It isn’t uncommon to meet someone with a degree who is dumb as fuck. I have a degree and don’t think I’m more or less intelligent necessarily than someone without one.
Owning a business doesn’t make you intelligent. It is not even remotely hard to start some businesses and many people who think they can do it. I’ve operated my Dad’s business while he was in the hospital. It’s not that complicated. Many people who “own” a business today may be broke in 5 years from that business. Happens all the time in America.
Also intelligence is very subjective. I’ve met people who I know are book smart as hell who seem like mouth breathing morons when it comes to common sense. At the same time I have friends who make more money than I do and successfully operate businesses who were lucky to graduate high school (largely from laziness). [/quote]
Careful H, with that line of reasoning you just might end up an honorary member of our club. [/quote]
I think I have some of the club members on ignore. Will that be a problem?
I’d rather be an individual anyways. I could honestly give two shits less who agrees with me on here. As evidenced by my disagreeing with almost everybody at some point lol.
I know I do not have the best ability to communicate my point all the time . But I think my point is being missed , so I will try to define it
In my opinion any one that runs a successful business has more on the ball than some one with a college degree and has never run a successful business
Success is all is your definition . In my case I made 2 or 3 times or more the amount of money I would have working for some one else I had GREAT flexibility in my schedule and I did it for close to 3 decades. from that stand point I was very happy doing what I did .
From the stand point , had I sold some of my free time and flexibility I may be living on the fruits of some one else’s labor.
Beans thinks I am shitting on his education , I’m not . Neither do I have any discomfort in my ass:) My point to him is I know more than one youngster that pretends to be more than they are . I would look you up for tax advice . I would even listen to business advice but I will never take you as an all knowing deity .
USMC
As far as any one else , only you know if you are successful
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
New Modus operandi , call it a drive by , ignore uncomfortable points of view , pretend you don’t understand
[/quote]
lol.
If and when you have anything of substance to say, since when have I ignored it?
I ignore you, and recently HH’s one liners in the hobby lobby thread because they have no meaning, no basis in reality, and nothing to do with the discussion they were interjected into.
Turnover is expensive. But not as expensive in low skilled labor as higher skilled. If we are talking writing code, or professional services it is different than pour coffee and banging keys on a register. But keep in mind, with higher wages comes more competent people looking for the position.
[/quote]
I’m not sure that’s necessarily turn though. We aren’t’ talking about a higher wage because the skill required is higher. The wage is artificially higher via government mandate. So you are still going to be hiring the same people at $10 you would of hired at $7.50 (for the most part).
I agree with most everything else. I’m just not sure you are suddenly going to have college grads fighting for a job pouring coffee because it’s $2.50 more/hr. [/quote]
You thinking too extreme.
I have a father of three who works in the local plant for the last 15 years, and is looking to pick up a couple shifts a week to be able to take his wife out more often and maybe go on a slightly better vacation.
v
A 16 year old who might just be a massive shit head, like I was. Smoking weed before his shift etc.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
yeah once again the CJS raises it’s ugly head , i think we may have even seen the nether regions (OH MY GAWD)
Once again I ask a question and I get maybe a serious question and the commentary of what I suspect to be grown men pleasuring themselves .
To the maybe serious question Carbiduis , So do you believe Hillary act was complicit ? Or do you believe her act was negligent ? or something else ?[/quote]
This is why Pitt.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I never got why the so called right is all up set about Bengasi .
I will state some of the facts , that I am aware [/quote]
I’m thinking, okay let’s see some facts about what happened. Maybe I’m not up-to-date on what’s going on.
Then you write:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Hillary Clinton supposedly heard there may be an attack [/quote]
Not even remotely a fact.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
GOP cut funding to Embassy security [/quote]
I have never heard this. Link?
"In fact, the Congressional Research Service has documented that Congress, whether led by Democrats and Republicans, year after year did not fully fund the various pots of money for embassy security. (See page 25.) The State Department, for instance, was shortchanged by $142 million in fiscal year 2010, when Democrats controlled both houses of Congress.
There is always a give-and-take between Congress and the executive branch about funding issues. Boxer spent many years on the Appropriations Committee, and we assume she does not believe that Congress should just rubber-stamp a president�??�??�??�??�??�?�¢??s budget proposals.
The funding gap was a bit higher in 2011 and 2012, when Republicans controlled the House, but we don�??�??�??�??�??�?�¢??t understand why Boxer would frame the security funding problem in such partisan terms. As journalist David Rohde has written, this is �??�??�??�??�??�?�¢??an enduring post-9/11 problem that both political parties ignore.�??�??�??�??�??�?�¢??
Moreover, while Boxer claims that Republicans �??�??�??�??�??�?�¢??cut�??�??�??�??�??�?�¢?? the budget, she is only comparing it to what the Obama administration proposed. The reality is that funding for embassy security has increased significantly in recent years"
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
please tell me what I am missing , Thanks [/quote]
How about the entire story…
You nonchalantly blamed the GOP for the non-response to the Benghazi attacks absolving the Democratic Party, the White House, and the President in the process.
You like Wikipedia, here you go:
[/quote]
well other than some rant , what is your point ? It is hard to see any possible direction other than you think i blame the GOP
[/quote]
My point is, why would you expect anyone to take such a fallacious comment seriously?
[/quote]
because if you take that seriously than you must take that Bush had warnings that 9-11 was going to happen .
I think a reasonable person would not think either Bush or Clinton complicit in these situations . I think they would think both were so inundated with information that they could not distinguish wheat from chaff
[/quote]
What, I’m not taking your comment seriously because it lacked any substance at all. You just pulled some stuff out of thin air and called them facts.
Clinton and Obama are getting shit for Benghazi because of how they reacted to the information they received. No one, I have seen, has said Clinton or Obama knew the attack was coming. [/quote]
if you are saying there was no proof that Bush was advised
otherwise I don’t know what you mean .
So you think that if Obama or Clinton knew of the coming attack that the would do nothing ?
Both Bush and Obama’s Admin is inundated with possibly too much info to process correctly.
[/quote]
I have no idea what you are talking about or how you have arrived at the conclusions above.
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
I’ve seen some, but it sounds like the guy just refused to pay an unfair tax. Right or wrong, we all have to pay unfair taxes and will end up in jail by gun point if we don’t. Oh, right, Pit says the guns are imaginary.[/quote]
can not win a debate with something that is true , so manufacture a non existing point . Standard
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
I’ve seen some, but it sounds like the guy just refused to pay an unfair tax. Right or wrong, we all have to pay unfair taxes and will end up in jail by gun point if we don’t. Oh, right, Pit says the guns are imaginary.[/quote]
can not win a debate with something that is true , so manufacture a non existing point . Standard [/quote]
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
I’ve seen some, but it sounds like the guy just refused to pay an unfair tax. Right or wrong, we all have to pay unfair taxes and will end up in jail by gun point if we don’t. Oh, right, Pit says the guns are imaginary.[/quote]
can not win a debate with something that is true , so manufacture a non existing point . Standard [/quote]
