Celebrating Atheism

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]Severiano wrote:<<< We are the ones who utilize reason and knowledge. >>>[/quote]You DO utilize reason and knowledge. EV REE BUDDY does. Couldn’t avoid them if you wanted to. Created in the image of the super logical God. That’s the point. [quote]Severiano wrote:<<< From an A priori standpoint there is no evidence for a God, AT ALL. >>>[/quote]From an A priori standpoint there is no particle of knowledge in all of existence, and ESPECIALLY man as created in His image, that IS NOT a clear and inescapable PROCLAMATION of not just any God, but my triune God of the bible. Trust me. You have not thought this through. The problem is not a lack of evidence. The problem is man’s blindness in sin. [quote]Severiano wrote:<<< though unless you want to take a position against the Catholic Philosopher Alvin Plantinga (who I am an avid fan of) >>>[/quote]My position is against every philosopher you ever heard of my friend. Couldn’t be otherwise. Laugh if you must. I’m used to it. [quote]Severiano wrote:<<< I’ll check out your thread, I have avoided it on purpose for a while. But if you say I should look at it, I will. [/quote]You should. It will take an investment of time though because, nuthin personal, but I am not typing all that over again. Take some time seriously. You might be surprised at how stimulating some of those exchanges are. I’m not saying that just because I’m in the middle of them. There are numerous far older threads and a couple thousand years of church history wherein this discussion has taken place.

My epistemology thread: The Secret History of Money - Politics and World Issues - Forums - T Nation

Brother Chris’s metaphysics thread: Metaphysics: The ACTUAL Key to Everything - Politics and World Issues - Forums - T Nation

Cortes free will thread: Free Will - Politics and World Issues - Forums - T Nation
[/quote]

To me this makes absolutely no sense at all. You claim to be a metaphysics man, but then you follow none of the rules or that even Plantinga follows, who is THE Philosophical mental giant as far as Catholicism goes. If you don’t agree with him, we are playing on different ball fields. Completely different. To me, it looks like you are making excuses to hold your position, but I could be wrong. I’m saying it just does not follow (in my mind).

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:

secular spirituality…?[/quote]

Deepak Chopra is one of the biggest modern day fraudsters out there.[/quote]

In what sense?

Is he any more of a fraud than a religious priest?

[quote]Severiano wrote:<<< To me this makes absolutely no sense at all. You claim to be a metaphysics man, but then you follow none of the rules or that even Plantinga follows, who is THE Philosophical mental giant as far as Catholicism goes. If you don’t agree with him, we are playing on different ball fields. Completely different. To me, it looks like you are making excuses to hold your position, but I could be wrong. I’m saying it just does not follow (in my mind). [/quote]My dear friend? You n I are gonna get along. =] This is brilliant and ABSOLUTELY right on. We are on COMPLETELY different ball fields. AND, the EXACT same one at the EXACT same time. Yes, not only does that make total sense, but it is the ONLY thing that does. Man has throughout his history, by virtue of the remaining though sinfully broken image of God, been so absolutely RIGHT about so very much of what he’s observed and published. While, due to this brokenness in sin, being so ABSOLUTELY wrong about how and why he’s right about it. This has led him to utterly corrupt and perverse conclusions even from the things he’s right about. I pray you will do some reading. It’s all there.

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
You DO utilize reason and knowledge. EV REE BUDDY does. Couldn’t avoid them if you wanted to.
[/quote]

To proudly proclaim this in PWI does indeed convince me that you are a man of unshakeable faith.

[quote]orion wrote:[quote]Tiribulus wrote:You DO utilize reason and knowledge. EV REE BUDDY does. Couldn’t avoid them if you wanted to. [/quote]To proudly proclaim this in PWI does indeed convince me that you are a man of unshakeable faith. [/quote]i may be sorry for asking, but what precisely do you mean by this?

[quote]LoRez wrote:

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Yeah, I wish there was one word for someone who despises religion but believes in God. Furthermore, that God doesn’t give a rat’s ass about any individual but does things for some inscrutible reasons of his own.

Is there a God at all or one who has some goal in mind and couldn’t care less about you, me, or anyone?

No one knows. But I do know that I exist, THAT is certain. And since God doesn’t give a shit , then I’ll behave as if he doesn’t exist anyway. Why try to please some entity that doesn’t care about you?[/quote]

I swear there’s a name for that, I just can’t place it.[/quote]

In most cases, “a deist” would work.
BUt, in this specific case, i think the name is “a troll”.

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:[quote]Tiribulus wrote:You DO utilize reason and knowledge. EV REE BUDDY does. Couldn’t avoid them if you wanted to. [/quote]To proudly proclaim this in PWI does indeed convince me that you are a man of unshakeable faith. [/quote]i may be sorry for asking, but what precisely do you mean by this?
[/quote]
Lol I think he means that some people in PWI most certainly forsake reason and knowledge or toss it by the wayside.

[quote]Severiano wrote:

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]Severiano wrote:<<< We are the ones who utilize reason and knowledge. >>>[/quote]You DO utilize reason and knowledge. EV REE BUDDY does. Couldn’t avoid them if you wanted to. Created in the image of the super logical God. That’s the point. [quote]Severiano wrote:<<< From an A priori standpoint there is no evidence for a God, AT ALL. >>>[/quote]From an A priori standpoint there is no particle of knowledge in all of existence, and ESPECIALLY man as created in His image, that IS NOT a clear and inescapable PROCLAMATION of not just any God, but my triune God of the bible. Trust me. You have not thought this through. The problem is not a lack of evidence. The problem is man’s blindness in sin. [quote]Severiano wrote:<<< though unless you want to take a position against the Catholic Philosopher Alvin Plantinga (who I am an avid fan of) >>>[/quote]My position is against every philosopher you ever heard of my friend. Couldn’t be otherwise. Laugh if you must. I’m used to it. [quote]Severiano wrote:<<< I’ll check out your thread, I have avoided it on purpose for a while. But if you say I should look at it, I will. [/quote]You should. It will take an investment of time though because, nuthin personal, but I am not typing all that over again. Take some time seriously. You might be surprised at how stimulating some of those exchanges are. I’m not saying that just because I’m in the middle of them. There are numerous far older threads and a couple thousand years of church history wherein this discussion has taken place.

My epistemology thread: The Secret History of Money - Politics and World Issues - Forums - T Nation

Brother Chris’s metaphysics thread: Metaphysics: The ACTUAL Key to Everything - Politics and World Issues - Forums - T Nation

Cortes free will thread: Free Will - Politics and World Issues - Forums - T Nation
[/quote]

To me this makes absolutely no sense at all. You claim to be a metaphysics man, but then you follow none of the rules or that even Plantinga follows, who is THE Philosophical mental giant as far as Catholicism goes. If you don’t agree with him, we are playing on different ball fields. Completely different. To me, it looks like you are making excuses to hold your position, but I could be wrong. I’m saying it just does not follow (in my mind). [/quote]
Hmm I don’t think Alvin Plantinga is Catholic just because he necessarily taught at Notre Dame and considering his work on “the Reformed objection to natural theology”, “Reformed epistemology and corresponding foundation in ‘Calvin’s sensus divinitatis’” and he him self says came from a ducth reformed background(though what he says he is I am not sure). Tirib is a Calvinist Van Tillian presuppositionalist.

Anyways getting to what Tirib is getting at(i’ll use Plantinga even though Tirib isn’t a fan); here is a relevant quote

(Reasonable Faith 3rd Ed. p41-42) “The notion of warrant, that quality which differentiates knowledge from merely true belief, is philosophically controversial, and it is to the analysiss of this notion that Plantinga then turns. He first exposits and then criticizes all major theories of warrant which are offered by epistemologists today, such as deontologism, reliabilism, coherentism and so forth. Fundamentally, Plantinga’s method of exposing the inadequacy of such theories is to construct thougth experiments or scenarios in which all the conditions for warrant stipulated by a theory are met and yet in which it is obvious that the person in question does not have knowledge of the proposition which he believes because his cognitive faculties are malfunctioning in forming the belief. this common failing suggests that rational warrant inherently involves the notion of the proper functioning of one’s cognitive faculties. But this raises the troublesome question, what does it mean for one’s cognitive faculties to be “fuctioning properly”? Here Plantinga drops a bomb into mainstream epistemology by proposing a peculiarly theistic account of rational warrant and proper functioning, namely, that one’s cognitive faculties are functioning properly only if they are functioning as God designed them to.”(Warranted Christian Belief).

This is a part of what Tirib means by “You steal reason and knowledge from my bank in so doing and I have demonstrated why in the epistemology and metaphysics thread among others. Check those please.” even though I think he could presented his case more clearly in those threads. Descartes also hints upon this in his Meditations in where he says “the less powerful the author to whom they attribute my origin, the more probable it will be that I am so imperfect as to be deceived all the time.”

Anyways I have to go hit arms and then go to work synthesizing chemicals.

[quote]Severiano wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]CSEagles1694 wrote:

[quote]Headhunter wrote:

[quote]CSEagles1694 wrote:
Okay, correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t you state in another thread that you believed in God, but just hated religion?

CS[/quote]

Of course. But I don’t know the term for someone who believes in a Spinozist type god but not the Christian one.
[/quote]

You’re a half-assed atheist.

CS[/quote]

Fence riders are weak minded.[/quote]

How?

The theist can claim to know god, or believe in god. The Theist who claims to know God had a personal experience, or is crazy.

The atheist claims to not have an opinion about god, but actually most have an active belief that there is no god. In that sense they have faith in nothing. The way this is put forth, the Atheist does not believe in any gods is the same as believing these gods are are a myth, therefore they believe that no such things exist.

The agnostic/ fence sitter understands both positions, and decides to not take part in believing in, nor believing not. We KNOW that the information cannot be known at the time, and sit on the fence. WE are the ones who utilize reason and knowledge.
[/quote]

No, you fail to follow the logic and draw a conclusion…

[quote]KingKai25 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

[quote]Headhunter wrote:

[quote]CSEagles1694 wrote:
Okay, correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t you state in another thread that you believed in God, but just hated religion?

CS[/quote]

Of course. But I don’t know the term for someone who believes in a Spinozist type god but not the Christian one.
[/quote]

Wouldn’t Deism be closest? Also I think Spinozism is an actual term but most won’t know what that means.[/quote]

No where near… I am a deist.[/quote]

Pat, my brother, how are you a deist? If you believe in miracles, how can you possibly be a deist?[/quote]

Philosophically speaking, I hold a deist tenet. All I need to prove God exists, is existence itself. I can go all day long with out referring to divine revelation of any kind, it’s simply not necessary.
I am not a deist in a religious sense. Technically, deism isn’t a religious proposition, it’s a philosophical one. I certainly don’t hold fast to puritanical deism, but under a philosophical umbrella, there’s no need for divine revelation. That’s my point, and solely that.

Technically speaking, if you want to get really technical, deism is kind of a bullshit term anyway. Creation is pretty miraculous in itself. When you get into the how’s and the why’s, your still claiming something miraculous occurred. Your just saying it happened once.
It’s even more miraculous if you an atheist because existence is dependent on nothing which makes it random and even more miraculous. For nothing to do something is a feat to behold for sure, except for the fact that it is logically impossible.

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

[quote]Headhunter wrote:

[quote]CSEagles1694 wrote:
Okay, correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t you state in another thread that you believed in God, but just hated religion?

CS[/quote]

Of course. But I don’t know the term for someone who believes in a Spinozist type god but not the Christian one.
[/quote]

Wouldn’t Deism be closest? Also I think Spinozism is an actual term but most won’t know what that means.[/quote]

No where near… I am a deist.[/quote]

Your not a deist if your catholic.[/quote]

It’s a philosophical stance, not a religious one. That’s what folks are missing. There is no ‘deist’ faith. It’s philosophical proposition.

btw, I think the statement I made to Sevariano in the post with the picture of the two boys is about the best swirl of cogency and concision I have been thus far capable of and maybe ever will be. These types of topics simply do not allow for quick short statements. I know you weren’t criticizing me per se, I’m just explaining.

[quote]KingKai25 wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:
Einstein was a theist, he just didn’t believe in a ‘personal’ god. Neither do I for that matter, there is just God, not a kind of God. But if you are going to make a thread celebrating atheism, which is weird since atheists perpetually claim is a lack of belief, not a belief, then you should quote atheists. Einstein may not have practiced a religion, but in God he did believe. [/quote]

You’re a Catholic, you believe in a personal God.

Enough with the half truths or outright lies pat.[/quote]

Incorrect. I am not a kind of pat, I am just pat, there is not a kind of God, there is just God. Whether or not you can know him is debatable, but the fact that he’s not personalized, isn’t a question. If I could personalize him, I throw on some DUB’s, a pair of JL 12’s and put a 572 big block under the hood with curb feelers and a chain steering wheel.[/quote]

I’d hate to point this out, but that definition personal God has nothing to do with personalizing God.[/quote]

Thank you for saying it[/quote]

I know what people mean when they say it. But for the sake of discussion, we need to be certain on definitions. Putting a prefix on God is a technical limitation. People use the term ‘personal God’ to mean, that they have a personal relationship with God. I am being technical, but when dealing with atheists you have to be technical.
A Christian takes the term ‘personal God’ as a truncated phrase. Then it’s no different than saying “Muslim God”, “Christian God”, etc. Well there is no such thing as those ‘types’, there’s God and then various ways to interact, personally and religiously. You paint yourself in to corners with prefixes. Things are not understood the same way across paradigms so you have state what you mean, you cannot expect an atheist to know what a ‘personal God’ means as it does in the Christian community. That’s all I am saying.

[quote]kamui wrote:

[quote]LoRez wrote:

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Yeah, I wish there was one word for someone who despises religion but believes in God. Furthermore, that God doesn’t give a rat’s ass about any individual but does things for some inscrutible reasons of his own.

Is there a God at all or one who has some goal in mind and couldn’t care less about you, me, or anyone?

No one knows. But I do know that I exist, THAT is certain. And since God doesn’t give a shit , then I’ll behave as if he doesn’t exist anyway. Why try to please some entity that doesn’t care about you?[/quote]

I swear there’s a name for that, I just can’t place it.[/quote]

In most cases, “a deist” would work.
BUt, in this specific case, i think the name is “a troll”.
[/quote]

LOL! Nailed it.

[quote]pat wrote:<<< It’s a philosophical stance, not a religious one. That’s what folks are missing. There is no ‘deist’ faith. It’s philosophical proposition.[/quote]For Christians, the two cannot be separated. That’s what YOU’RE missing. You display the most anti-systematic thinking I have ever seen in a smart guy Pat. The compartments in your delightfully entertaining mind are hermetically sealed from one another. God bless the internet. Oh the people I do meet.

[quote]JoabSonOfZeruiah wrote:

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:[quote]Tiribulus wrote:You DO utilize reason and knowledge. EV REE BUDDY does. Couldn’t avoid them if you wanted to. [/quote]To proudly proclaim this in PWI does indeed convince me that you are a man of unshakeable faith. [/quote]i may be sorry for asking, but what precisely do you mean by this?
[/quote]
Lol I think he means that some people in PWI most certainly forsake reason and knowledge or toss it by the wayside.[/quote]

I would have said that they ride and abuse them until they are broken like a Dacian catamite, but yes.

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:<<< It’s a philosophical stance, not a religious one. That’s what folks are missing. There is no ‘deist’ faith. It’s philosophical proposition.[/quote]For Christians, the two cannot be separated. That’s what YOU’RE missing. You display the most anti-systematic thinking I have ever seen in a smart guy Pat. The compartments in your delightfully entertaining mind are hermetically sealed from one another. God bless the internet. Oh the people I do meet.
[/quote]

Incorrect.

[quote]orion wrote:[quote]JoabSonOfZeruiah wrote:[quote]Tiribulus wrote:[quote]orion wrote:[quote]Tiribulus wrote:You DO utilize reason and knowledge. EV REE BUDDY does. Couldn’t avoid them if you wanted to. [/quote]To proudly proclaim this in PWI does indeed convince me that you are a man of unshakeable faith. [/quote]i may be sorry for asking, but what precisely do you mean by this?[/quote]Lol I think he means that some people in PWI most certainly forsake reason and knowledge or toss it by the wayside.[/quote]I would have said that they ride and abuse them until they are broken like a Dacian catamite, but yes.[/quote]I must be unusually dense today. I still don’t get it. Are you ridiculing me? Which would be fine, I just want to understand.

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:[quote]JoabSonOfZeruiah wrote:[quote]Tiribulus wrote:[quote]orion wrote:[quote]Tiribulus wrote:You DO utilize reason and knowledge. EV REE BUDDY does. Couldn’t avoid them if you wanted to. [/quote]To proudly proclaim this in PWI does indeed convince me that you are a man of unshakeable faith. [/quote]i may be sorry for asking, but what precisely do you mean by this?[/quote]Lol I think he means that some people in PWI most certainly forsake reason and knowledge or toss it by the wayside.[/quote]I would have said that they ride and abuse them until they are broken like a Dacian catamite, but yes.[/quote]I must be unusually dense today. I still don’t get it. Are you ridiculing me? Which would be fine, I just want to understand.
[/quote]

You posted that people cannot help but use reason and logic.

In this here forum.

O_O

To you actually read some of the stuff that gets posted here?

[quote]orion wrote:You posted that people cannot help but use reason and logic.
In this here forum.
O_O
Do you actually read some of the stuff that gets posted here?[/quote]You were joking. Forgive me, I totally missed it. =]