Can Coulter Sink Any Lower?

[quote]Wreckless wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
I find it amazing how people who would run and hide like rodents if they heard a gunshot or saw a guy coming toward them with a raised fist, attack people who speak out, like Coulter.

Fragging is done on a battlefield or in a war zone because the person who leads you is a coward, inept, or just plain stupid — to the point where that person endangers those he commands. If he is not removed by those above him, then its so much the worse for him.

Dying because some one else is a clown or a coward is not an option.

Headhunter

Are you saying Bush should be shot? It sure sounds like it.

And it sure sounds like Ann Coulter is saying the same thing.

Hey, she sounds like my kinda woman. I bet she works out.

But, as Zap is so eager to point out, I really don’t know that much about US politics.[/quote]

Looks like Droopy is following me around again, wanting to hump my leg. “No, you may not hump my leg or any other part of me! Down boy!!”

HH

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
GDollars37 wrote:

You’re an idiot. Fragging is not something to be celebrated or even condoned; the fact that it took place in Vietnam was emblematic of how completely the U.S. Army had fallen apart.

And as for your hypothetical situation, who knows? I’ve never been in that situation, and I’m pretty sure you haven’t either, so sounding off about it on the internet contributes nothing.

No branch of military service is perfect. Most of the time, those in command deserve to be there and they are men of honor. But, when a dweeb fresh from ROTC starts ordering you and your friends to very probable death, all because he insists that you walk that trail, well,…you’ll figure it out.

HH
[/quote]

In a totally honest, non rhetorical way: Are you a combat veteran?

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Wreckless wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
I find it amazing how people who would run and hide like rodents if they heard a gunshot or saw a guy coming toward them with a raised fist, attack people who speak out, like Coulter.

Fragging is done on a battlefield or in a war zone because the person who leads you is a coward, inept, or just plain stupid — to the point where that person endangers those he commands. If he is not removed by those above him, then its so much the worse for him.

Dying because some one else is a clown or a coward is not an option.

Headhunter

Are you saying Bush should be shot? It sure sounds like it.

And it sure sounds like Ann Coulter is saying the same thing.

Hey, she sounds like my kinda woman. I bet she works out.

But, as Zap is so eager to point out, I really don’t know that much about US politics.

Looks like Droopy is following me around again, wanting to hump my leg. “No, you may not hump my leg or any other part of me! Down boy!!”

HH
[/quote]

Sorry.

When I read “the person who leads you is a coward, inept, or just plain stupid”, I jumped to conclusions. It won’t happen again. At least, not today.

I should have known that you were talking about a decorated veteran and a Democrat.
God knows a coward, inept, plain stupid but Republican leader, doesn’t deserve such a fate.

But you got me thinking though. If the war on terror is global, isn’t the white house also a war zone?
Hmmm???

Ann Coulter…another mouthpiece for the Reich.

Apparently she can sink lower:

http://mediamatters.org/items/200606220013

But she really isn’t sinking any lower than many of the cheerleader posters on this board will do.

Much like these posters, she will tell you how low you sink to prove your point by sinking even lower than you would ever do. This is done by never answering a question, answering a question with a question to spin things in their favor, getting mad when they are questioned and personally attacking people that have the nerve to question them, trying to make people look like they are wrong for defending themselves from their attacks and making themselves look like victims instead of the agressors that they are. This happens on this board all the time by the psycho cheerleader faction. She is really just a reflection of their mindset.

They can shit on you and they expect that you are suppose to take it without complaint. If you stand up for yourself, you are picking on them and are mean-spiritted and hate-filled. In other words, most have the emotional maturity of a 2-year old that was told “No”.

[quote]ALDurr wrote:
They can shit on you and they expect that you are suppose to take it without complaint. If you stand up for yourself, you are picking on them and are mean-spiritted and hate-filled. In other words, most have the emotional maturity of a 2-year old that was told “No”.[/quote]

The really funny thing is that the above quote can all too easily be applied to both sides.

It’s politics. It’s partisan politics. To borrow from a thought vroom had - this forum is made up of the extremes from both sides. There is not much play for anyone on a fence, or in the middle.

I haven’t read what Coulter said. It really doesn’t matter to me that much. I just think that your last paragraph pretty well describes this political forum.

[quote]rainjack wrote:
ALDurr wrote:
They can shit on you and they expect that you are suppose to take it without complaint. If you stand up for yourself, you are picking on them and are mean-spiritted and hate-filled. In other words, most have the emotional maturity of a 2-year old that was told “No”.

The really funny thing is that the above quote can all too easily be applied to both sides.

It’s politics. It’s partisan politics. To borrow from a thought vroom had - this forum is made up of the extremes from both sides. There is not much play for anyone on a fence, or in the middle.

I haven’t read what Coulter said. It really doesn’t matter to me that much. I just think that your last paragraph pretty well describes this political forum. [/quote]

You are absolutly right about this being applied to both sides. I agree with you. However, the people doing it will be the first ones to tell you how wrong you are for doing it to them. I have never minded anyone arguing with me. What I do mind are the shitty tactics that are used that really have nothing to do with the discussion and are just cheap shots from people that have a viewpoints that know they can’t defend.

For example Rainjack, I may not agree with you on some things, but I would never call you a redneck for voicing your opinion because you made it clear how you felt about that word. There are others on here that would do it just to get you riled up because they know when they have a faulty argument and they need to distract you.

I know, because I have had it happen to me on many occassions. Argue about what I said, but leave the name calling and cheap shots out of it. It just means you have no real point. (*Note- this is a general statement and is not directed at you personally.)