SuzyQ…
FTMFW.
thats all I gots to say 'bout that.
[quote]celtics2022 wrote:
[quote]The other Rob wrote:
with suspect progress pictures calls out a member of this site who isn’t a twat and is actually pretty funny.
[/quote]
What is this supposed to mean? How are the pictures I take suspect?[/quote]
Finally after 3.5 pages you decide to poke your head out from under the bridge to collect the troll toll.
Here are the glute pics you requested.
[quote]ADvanced TS wrote:
[quote]celtics2022 wrote:
[quote]The other Rob wrote:
with suspect progress pictures calls out a member of this site who isn’t a twat and is actually pretty funny.
[/quote]
What is this supposed to mean? How are the pictures I take suspect?[/quote]
Finally after 3.5 pages you decide to poke your head out from under the bridge to collect the troll toll.
Here are the glute pics you requested.[/quote]
I bet you hip thrust a million.
[quote]LankyMofo wrote:
[quote]SSC wrote:
I’m really confused. Someone who’s actually been making legitimate progress on this site (Celtics) calls out a guy who posts in just about every thread (where said posts are usually pointless) but doesn’t actually put up but any pictures or serious conversation about lifting. . .
And you guys still give Celtics shit?
Actually wait, no, that sounds about right for this site.[/quote]
Have you been following celtics post history? At this point it doesn’t matter what he posts. All of his posts are open for public mockery. The only thing on this site bigger than Prof X is celtic’s ego.
Sure, he’s making progress. We get it. That doesn’t give him the golden stick enabling him to call out every mother fucker on this site he doesn’t like or disagrees with. Celtics is a complete tool.
Edit - and if your problem is with this site in general, there are plenty of other sites you can check out. [/quote]
Fine, Celtics has an attitude problem. Maybe he has a big ego. I’ve heard the same complaints about Professor X. Being it is what it is, I’d rather have a guy inhabiting the (bodybuilding/fitness) boards who actually walks the walk and is a prick than someone who just posts random pictures of boobs that any shmuck can find off of Google and makes irrelevant three-word posts in every thread he can find.
That JB guy comes to mind, I think it’s jb99 or something similar. He’s a big guy, and I don’t agree with a lot of his sentiments - but I respect him a hell of a lot more than Optheta or some of those other guys who continue to be merely a name behind a non-representative avatar.
I don’t feel the call-out is unwarranted by any means. I mean, seriously, does he even have a log or can ANYONE find a post he’s made that’s lifting related? There’s plenty of other “Golden boys” around these forums who are in a similar position, but I am not callous nor douchebag enough to name them.
Look, what it breaks down to is that I just don’t get why everyone’s giving him (Kerley) the benefit of the doubt.
^ losing 40 lbs of chub in 4 months aint much…but whatever.
[quote]SSC wrote:
[quote]LankyMofo wrote:
[quote]SSC wrote:
I’m really confused. Someone who’s actually been making legitimate progress on this site (Celtics) calls out a guy who posts in just about every thread (where said posts are usually pointless) but doesn’t actually put up but any pictures or serious conversation about lifting. . .
And you guys still give Celtics shit?
Actually wait, no, that sounds about right for this site.[/quote]
Have you been following celtics post history? At this point it doesn’t matter what he posts. All of his posts are open for public mockery. The only thing on this site bigger than Prof X is celtic’s ego.
Sure, he’s making progress. We get it. That doesn’t give him the golden stick enabling him to call out every mother fucker on this site he doesn’t like or disagrees with. Celtics is a complete tool.
Edit - and if your problem is with this site in general, there are plenty of other sites you can check out. [/quote]
Fine, Celtics has an attitude problem. Maybe he has a big ego. I’ve heard the same complaints about Professor X. Being it is what it is, I’d rather have a guy inhabiting the (bodybuilding/fitness) boards who actually walks the walk and is a prick than someone who just posts random pictures of boobs that any shmuck can find off of Google and makes irrelevant three-word posts in every thread he can find.
That JB guy comes to mind, I think it’s jb99 or something similar. He’s a big guy, and I don’t agree with a lot of his sentiments - but I respect him a hell of a lot more than Optheta or some of those other guys who continue to be merely a name behind a non-representative avatar.
I don’t feel the call-out is unwarranted by any means. I mean, seriously, does he even have a log or can ANYONE find a post he’s made that’s lifting related? There’s plenty of other “Golden boys” around these forums who are in a similar position, but I am not callous nor douchebag enough to name them.
Look, what it breaks down to is that I just don’t get why everyone’s giving him (Kerley) the benefit of the doubt. [/quote]
I think there is some logic in this. The back bone of this community revolves around fitness, training, and nutrition, and I think that is how it should be.
However, tits are also extremely important (vital for human life), but should be relegated to the SAMA and GAL forums.
So…can we get some tits in here?
[quote]SSC wrote:
Fine, Celtics has an attitude problem. Maybe he has a big ego. I’ve heard the same complaints about Professor X. Being it is what it is, I’d rather have a guy inhabiting the (bodybuilding/fitness) boards who actually walks the walk and is a prick than someone who just posts random pictures of boobs that any shmuck can find off of Google and makes irrelevant three-word posts in every thread he can find.
That JB guy comes to mind, I think it’s jb99 or something similar. He’s a big guy, and I don’t agree with a lot of his sentiments - but I respect him a hell of a lot more than Optheta or some of those other guys who continue to be merely a name behind a non-representative avatar.
I don’t feel the call-out is unwarranted by any means. I mean, seriously, does he even have a log or can ANYONE find a post he’s made that’s lifting related? There’s plenty of other “Golden boys” around these forums who are in a similar position, but I am not callous nor douchebag enough to name them.
Look, what it breaks down to is that I just don’t get why everyone’s giving him (Kerley) the benefit of the doubt. [/quote]
I see where SSC is coming from. We do have a group of folks on this site who do nothing but post bullshit and never seem to even want to discuss training - in other words they don’t seem like they even lift.
Now, I think Kerley is a nice kid, and see no reason to put him on the spot, but let’s be fair here. People around here like Kerley (and a few others) so it seems they get a free pass. Other folks are given a metric ton of shit for not showing any progress, or not being very interested in bodybuilding - doesn’t really seem fair.
[quote]WestCoast7 wrote:
tits are also extremely important[/quote]
QFT
so Celtic: were you serous about the call out?
Obviously a call out of Kerley would result in fap jokes and pics of hot girls…
Maybe someone should call him out more often
[quote]caveman101 wrote:
british bird for ya kerly[/quote]
nice ashley cole is a muppet for cheating on her, i would SMASH! are you insinuating am British?
[quote]SkyNett wrote:
[quote]SSC wrote:
Fine, Celtics has an attitude problem. Maybe he has a big ego. I’ve heard the same complaints about Professor X. Being it is what it is, I’d rather have a guy inhabiting the (bodybuilding/fitness) boards who actually walks the walk and is a prick than someone who just posts random pictures of boobs that any shmuck can find off of Google and makes irrelevant three-word posts in every thread he can find.
That JB guy comes to mind, I think it’s jb99 or something similar. He’s a big guy, and I don’t agree with a lot of his sentiments - but I respect him a hell of a lot more than Optheta or some of those other guys who continue to be merely a name behind a non-representative avatar.
I don’t feel the call-out is unwarranted by any means. I mean, seriously, does he even have a log or can ANYONE find a post he’s made that’s lifting related? There’s plenty of other “Golden boys” around these forums who are in a similar position, but I am not callous nor douchebag enough to name them.
Look, what it breaks down to is that I just don’t get why everyone’s giving him (Kerley) the benefit of the doubt. [/quote]
I see where SSC is coming from. We do have a group of folks on this site who do nothing but post bullshit and never seem to even want to discuss training - in other words they don’t seem like they even lift.
Now, I think Kerley is a nice kid, and see no reason to put him on the spot, but let’s be fair here. People around here like Kerley (and a few others) so it seems they get a free pass. Other folks are given a metric ton of shit for not showing any progress, or not being very interested in bodybuilding - doesn’t really seem fair. [/quote]
I agree.
[quote]ADvanced TS wrote:
[quote]ADvanced TS wrote:
.[/quote]
[/quote]
ROFL oh man how did this go unnoticed?!
And yeah, that post SuzieQ had in the thread anonym linked was classic stuff.
GO KERLEY!
[quote]SkyNett wrote:
[quote]SSC wrote:
Fine, Celtics has an attitude problem. Maybe he has a big ego. I’ve heard the same complaints about Professor X. Being it is what it is, I’d rather have a guy inhabiting the (bodybuilding/fitness) boards who actually walks the walk and is a prick than someone who just posts random pictures of boobs that any shmuck can find off of Google and makes irrelevant three-word posts in every thread he can find.
That JB guy comes to mind, I think it’s jb99 or something similar. He’s a big guy, and I don’t agree with a lot of his sentiments - but I respect him a hell of a lot more than Optheta or some of those other guys who continue to be merely a name behind a non-representative avatar.
I don’t feel the call-out is unwarranted by any means. I mean, seriously, does he even have a log or can ANYONE find a post he’s made that’s lifting related? There’s plenty of other “Golden boys” around these forums who are in a similar position, but I am not callous nor douchebag enough to name them.
Look, what it breaks down to is that I just don’t get why everyone’s giving him (Kerley) the benefit of the doubt. [/quote]
I see where SSC is coming from. We do have a group of folks on this site who do nothing but post bullshit and never seem to even want to discuss training - in other words they don’t seem like they even lift.
Now, I think Kerley is a nice kid, and see no reason to put him on the spot, but let’s be fair here. People around here like Kerley (and a few others) so it seems they get a free pass. Other folks are given a metric ton of shit for not showing any progress, or not being very interested in bodybuilding - doesn’t really seem fair. [/quote]
i am interested in Bodybuilding, i dont post in the bodybuilding section much because am not big (i post in the off season BB’s one cause i can actually add something to that), i read the threads in it though.
[quote]SkyNett wrote:
[quote]SSC wrote:
Fine, Celtics has an attitude problem. Maybe he has a big ego. I’ve heard the same complaints about Professor X. Being it is what it is, I’d rather have a guy inhabiting the (bodybuilding/fitness) boards who actually walks the walk and is a prick than someone who just posts random pictures of boobs that any shmuck can find off of Google and makes irrelevant three-word posts in every thread he can find.
That JB guy comes to mind, I think it’s jb99 or something similar. He’s a big guy, and I don’t agree with a lot of his sentiments - but I respect him a hell of a lot more than Optheta or some of those other guys who continue to be merely a name behind a non-representative avatar.
I don’t feel the call-out is unwarranted by any means. I mean, seriously, does he even have a log or can ANYONE find a post he’s made that’s lifting related? There’s plenty of other “Golden boys” around these forums who are in a similar position, but I am not callous nor douchebag enough to name them.
Look, what it breaks down to is that I just don’t get why everyone’s giving him (Kerley) the benefit of the doubt. [/quote]
I see where SSC is coming from. We do have a group of folks on this site who do nothing but post bullshit and never seem to even want to discuss training - in other words they don’t seem like they even lift.
[/quote]
I’ve asked Kerley serious questions in regard to his training and got a serious answer, but when the question is done in a confrontational manner by a douchebag it’s a different story.
If you strictly want to talk 100% fitness go to the T-Cell, if you don’t have a stick up your ass and don’t mind some variety, sarcastic posts, and funny cat pics, you’re in the right place. I could see if he was littering the BB threads with bullshit, but he mostly posts in GAL and SAMA, so get over it
I know you like redheads kerley so this one’s for you!
[quote]SkyNett wrote:
[quote]SSC wrote:
Fine, Celtics has an attitude problem. Maybe he has a big ego. I’ve heard the same complaints about Professor X. Being it is what it is, I’d rather have a guy inhabiting the (bodybuilding/fitness) boards who actually walks the walk and is a prick than someone who just posts random pictures of boobs that any shmuck can find off of Google and makes irrelevant three-word posts in every thread he can find.
That JB guy comes to mind, I think it’s jb99 or something similar. He’s a big guy, and I don’t agree with a lot of his sentiments - but I respect him a hell of a lot more than Optheta or some of those other guys who continue to be merely a name behind a non-representative avatar.
I don’t feel the call-out is unwarranted by any means. I mean, seriously, does he even have a log or can ANYONE find a post he’s made that’s lifting related? There’s plenty of other “Golden boys” around these forums who are in a similar position, but I am not callous nor douchebag enough to name them.
Look, what it breaks down to is that I just don’t get why everyone’s giving him (Kerley) the benefit of the doubt. [/quote]
I see where SSC is coming from. We do have a group of folks on this site who do nothing but post bullshit and never seem to even want to discuss training - in other words they don’t seem like they even lift.
Now, I think Kerley is a nice kid, and see no reason to put him on the spot, but let’s be fair here. People around here like Kerley (and a few others) so it seems they get a free pass. Other folks are given a metric ton of shit for not showing any progress, or not being very interested in bodybuilding - doesn’t really seem fair. [/quote]
Names?
[quote]AndrewG909 wrote:
I know you like redheads kerley so this one’s for you!
[/quote]
…