[quote]bigflamer wrote:
[quote]pat wrote:
[quote]bigflamer wrote:
[quote]pat wrote:
[quote]bigflamer wrote:
[quote]pat wrote:
[quote]bigflamer wrote:
[quote]pat wrote:
[quote]bigflamer wrote:
So, first you say this…
[quote]pat wrote:
Defeat it then sampson… Put your money where your mouth is. I won’t hold my breath.[/quote]
Then this falls out of your sewer…
[quote]pat wrote:
BTW, if you just post a bunch of silly links, then so will I. That doesn’t prove you know shit. Anyone can google.[/quote]
Jesus H. Fucking Christ on a stick, you really are dumb as a bucket of mule piss. It’s conversations such as this that qualify me to label you a dumb ass. Way to avoid the debate, patty cakes. Or…I have an idea, maybe you can make the attempt to answer my questions; maybe. I rather hope you try.
[/quote]
Wow, is this the best you can do? Really? LOL! That’s just pathetic. Ooooo you called me a bunch of names! What are you 12?
FAIL.[/quote]
And you still avoid the argument…
[/quote]
You haven’t presented one. You told me how stupid I was and called me a bunch of names, is that your argument? 'Cause as far as I know, you don’t have one an never did.[/quote]
Well, I’ll give you this, you’re half right at least with the above statement. I certainly did inform you of your obvious stupidity and call you a bunch of names; guilty as charged.
Try and recall, that it was YOU who presented the argument; I simply threw the bullshit flag on you, and presented a counter argument in the form of questions, the answers to which will support my counter argument. So I’ll once again ask of you, to simply answer the questions.
Is all of this too confusing for you? Cuz if you just don’t want to answer the questions, feel free to piss off.[/quote]
You presented no counter argument. Saying “Bullshit” is not a counter argument. So no, I most definitely am not confused. You brought in Hitler and Pol Pot, those are not counter arguments. Those are red herrings, diversions. Then you called me a bunch of nasty mean names, not very creative, and still not counter arguments. It’s utter garbage, but apparently it’s all you got, garbage, nothing.
Quit whining. Put up, or shut up.[/quote]
And you still won’t even attempt to answer the questions…[/quote]
You didn’t ask any questions, nimrod. How the fuck dense can you be? You want me to answer a question, ask a question. [/quote]
Fucks sake man, I gotta hold your hand through this whole process!?
This was posted by me on the previopus page:
[quote]bigflamer wrote:
Tell me, what drives a MAO, a Hitler, or a Pol Pot do do what they did? Was Hitler even an atheist? If it helps…you could try google.[/quote]
[/quote]
I did answer that. I mistakenly called it a strawman it’s actually a red herring. It’s doesn’t make the slightest damn if hitler and pol pot where Carmalite Nuns working for the ‘Our Lady of Chastity’ convent. How the hell does what hitler or pol pot believed make a shit about whether or not God exists, where or not something can come from nothing, or whether or not religion is right, wrong or indifferent.
Introducing shit has nothing to do with anything is a ridiculous proposition. I never made a claim that hitler was anything, or pol pot. They may be relevant evil bastards in history, but they are not relevant to a discussion about the existence of God and epistemology.
If you are actually curios though about the history of the evils of atheism in history then here is a link you can peruse at your own leisure (like you would even bother), but it’s here.
http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/NOTE1.HTM
So do you have anything relevant to the argument at hand or do you just want to introduce irrelevant points that are utterly meaningless?