I am seeing some cephalic action in that last shot. Do you carry alot more subcutaneous BF around the waist or legs? Could be 13-16% but so hard to say without full multi-compartment visual analysis.
The estimate above is via what method?
Have you tried the formulas?
Love to see your table.
Where are your abs? Maybe you should
People usually hide the areas they donāt want to be seen. Canāt help but notice the thighs and midsection are coveredā¦
Imagine looking about average whilst having multiple cycles under your belt. I can see why youāre angry all the time.
Giving me a lot of credit. 97 lb weakling. But I am excited that Dynamic Tension kit should be here soon.
Iām unable to post anymore replies, but I knew there would be excuses ā¦ I have upper abs occasionally showing and have a pic but as I said canāt post.
And no not multiple cycles, started trt almost 3 years ago, maybe 3 cycles. I just trt now at 200 test and 300 mast . Yes itās my trt so shut it.
I disagree here. The pics look pretty good. Better than I expected by a long shot. Better than most people who use steroids.
Credit to @150mgaweek for posting. Second time on this site that Iāve been wrong about claimed BF%. I think he is pretty close to his estimate, and isnāt delusional or BSing people. I do think he could be a little nicer haha.
I think this is a poor metric. There are dudes with FFMIs of 20 on tren.
Maybe he is 18%, maybe he isnāt. Not 1 shirtless photo to give credence to his claim though (there are some conveniently cropped pictures FWIW).
Tommy Lee approved.
Hct and lipids before and after mast? Whatās your plan throughout the year?
If I saw that physique in public, I would think āthat guy is on the sauceā. IMO, that isnāt a terrible metric to determine if one is doing well.
I think a lot of gear users really donāt look the part. You would never guess that they are on, and that is the majority, not some small subset.
Would someone tell me how a person can take 300mg/wk Mast and claim to be on TRT?
Sounds like eating an 10oz sirloin strip and a salad claiming to be a Vegan.
Thereās a lot of stuff on here even I canāt explain. Itās definitely not a tractable problem using mathematics, science, etc.
You can identify as anything nowadays.
EDIT: Let me do a better job:
[Synthetic Chemistry remove/shift some functional groups blah blah]
[ok]
Add it all up and divide by 5 to 7. Voila TRT!
Hereās the reason, because itās my trt itās what I feel good at, and I have yet to ever take an AI so when ppl take 200 mgs a week and 3 aromasin, ppl never say a word still drugs on drugs. I feel great libido, mood, everything. By the way 45 years old too forgot to mention
I felt good on 200mg/wk testosterone too. It was a component of my cycle of AAS.
Thanks for clarifying, but to me, you are taking AASās. To say otherwise misrepresents the facts.
In three decades of bodybuilding competition I never took more than 200mg/wk testosterone cypionate. (Exception: 10 days out from my target contest of the year I would take 100mg/day testosterone suspension, because it didnāt have water retention tendency.)
500 mg/wk total AAS. Tomatoe/Tomato. Abuse/use.
If it feels good.
Iād say all fair if you want to call it a cruise. Trt is a stretch.
If 500mg/wk is a cruise when 300mg is an anabolic steroid, I have no idea what a cruise is. That would be a relatively heavy cycle for me.
Itās not that uncommon for guys to cruise on a lot. More than Iāve ever done as a cycle / blast. I donāt know all the details of my buddies that blast and cruise, but I know at least one of them had cruised on 700 test and 300 EQ for years. Iām not willing to take those risks, but that guy is jacked AF. He told me when he blasted, that he took a whole vial of test e 250 per week, with other compounds mixed in. Some people use a lot.
I think we should stop calling stuff like this ācruiseā.