Like I told you in an email, if you want to be become a patient I will introduce you to our medical director.
@em2510 Who lipshultz?
Wow your so cute and funny! Smart? Still canāt answer that.
A patient from a clinic that does weekly administration, blocks all the benefits of TRT by blocking E2, and aims for numbers instead of treating symptoms, who canāt tell you the names of the doctors you would be dealing with so you can research them first, has any content, has any social following of any kind. A clinic like that, you mean? If ANYONE with even 5 minutes worth of knowledge on the subject would go see you, I call them imbeciles.
1 Like
This guy is insane. Where are the men with the white coats when you need them?
1 Like
No not Lipshultz.
I have showed you perfect lab numbers of our clients multiple times, when are you going to show me some bullet FULL labs of someone on TRT?
Send labs to a guy that doesnāt exist so he can share it with docs who donāt exist? What do I get out of that? A medal?
1 Like
Serious question here, no arguments - can you point me to studies or historical blood work from the past that shows what ranges used to be? More for my own curiosity than anything and would be nice to have these for reference.
Thanks!
Well either way there is about 5 in the world, that yea you can say, they have a more extensive background than me in this exact subject. So if your with one of them, awesome for you. Glad you didnāt wind up with a quack that said you can run supra for 5 years.
So trying to diminish the value of someone who does what I do just means you donāt understand interventional endocrinologyās history and how it came about.
I am not saying I am some expert, but to try and smear me and say my opinion is irrelevant when I have as much experience as I do is a low blow.
@bcostigan41 the ranges donāt go back that far. Max that we have found was total of 1500. But that was only a few years ago. Max now is like 900. Thatās a HUGE difference! Weāre trying to find the values from decades ago but we donāt even think there were any clinical ranges for it back then. Weāve found nothing so far but weāre still looking.
1 Like
*youāre
1 Like
Itās irrelevant. Because you donāt exist.
I ācouldā send you my own labs taking 250mg a week. Would that make you stop crying? Would you then go fly away to the rest of your ghost family? Promise?
Thats not true the ranges are the same, I already post a LabCorp lab from 2014 above.
The range went up to 21 ng/dl, not 40
@iron_yuppie HAHAHAHAHAHA! I was going to but you beat me to it lol!
1 Like
Thanks. Looking forward to new stuff from your doctors you work with. Really interested to see how things will progress over time with TRT.
1 Like
I stop reading this thread because I need no more contradictory information.
Today even my fitness coach told me I dont need TRT because Im in range. What I understood is his T is much worse lol but he has been running cycles before. He is a good trainer but not a hormonal expert
The ranges are NOT the same.
Youāre going to tell me that just a few years ago it was 1500 and now it is 900ā¦ and somehow, with that HUGE dip in a few years that itās been 1500 since the dawn of time? Are you that close minded??
This is what everyone is still waiting for. I called for this 2 months ago from you @dbossa in another thread
Hereās a circle, Todd. Square it for me.
2 Likes
Itās really exciting. It really is. I am lucky to get a lot of information I canāt repeat as itās still confidential. Once it is released, trust me, everyone will be making changes to their protocols.