You sound like you belong back in the 1940s. Affirmative action started not to get blacks into higher education. Colleges and grad schools first made students identify their religion and race because the powers that be decided too many Jews and Catholics were ending up at nice Ivy League schools.
So, they began to actively screen them out, even though by the merits and under race and religion blind standards, they deserved to be there.
[quote]jsbrook wrote:
Only you would find those posts thoughtful. JTF manages to link the Jews or at least the ‘Zionists bent on World Domination’ to every crisis no matter how tenuous and ludicrious the supposed connection.[/quote]
You are making the mistake that people make when calling all Italians Mafiosi or Muslims suiche bombers. JTF is attacking superich Jews who use money to influence the world. Calling someone an anti-semite for pointing this out is incorrect.
Correct me if I’m wrong but his argument is NOT with most Jews.
[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
Good post JTF!
Why are you even posting on this site, having discredited yourself utterly with the ARL/HH business? Wasn’t Ayn Rand Jewish?
Nope. My HH account was heavily moderated to the point where my posts took 4 hours or more to appear. Not because of Politics or any of the other stuff I write, but because I broke an unwritten rule. I like to argue; how do you argue with delays like that?
FWIW, I am Jewish (technically), since my mom was. And I like JTF’s posts — I find them thoughtful, highly intelligent, and well-supported by documentation. Also, most Jews despise the Zionists who give us a bad name, much as Muslim extremists give Islam a bad name.
If all this bothers you, follow that ‘salad tosser’ Pushharder and ignore my posts.
Go away. [/quote]
Okay, Push!!
[quote]Also, most Jews despise the Zionists who give us a bad name, much as Muslim extremists give Islam a bad name.
[/quote]
LOL.
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
Good post JTF!
Why are you even posting on this site, having discredited yourself utterly with the ARL/HH business? Wasn’t Ayn Rand Jewish?
Nope. My HH account was heavily moderated to the point where my posts took 4 hours or more to appear. Not because of Politics or any of the other stuff I write, but because I broke an unwritten rule. I like to argue; how do you argue with delays like that?
FWIW, I am Jewish (technically), since my mom was. And I like JTF’s posts — I find them thoughtful, highly intelligent, and well-supported by documentation. Also, most Jews despise the Zionists who give us a bad name, much as Muslim extremists give Islam a bad name.
If all this bothers you, follow that ‘salad tosser’ Pushharder and ignore my posts.
Go away.
Okay, Push!!
[/quote]
You should make a public service announcement:
PRCalDude = Pushharder.
The only thing you’ll lack is evidence, but that shouldn’t matter to a guy like you, and nobody believes a word out of your mouth anyway. Do it!
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
jsbrook wrote:
Only you would find those posts thoughtful. JTF manages to link the Jews or at least the ‘Zionists bent on World Domination’ to every crisis no matter how tenuous and ludicrious the supposed connection.
You are making the mistake that people make when calling all Italians Mafiosi or Muslims suiche bombers. JTF is attacking superich Jews who use money to influence the world. Calling someone an anti-semite for pointing this out is incorrect.
Correct me if I’m wrong but his argument is NOT with most Jews.
[/quote]
He still continuously links Jews in positions of power to scandal and corruption even when their involvement is even less plausible than here. Far less plausible. And when Jews are involved scandals or corruption, political or otherwise, there are usually plenty of non-Jews involved in the same scandal. Superich Jews use money to influence the world. But no more than superich [insert other religion]. The religion of these cranks is never relevant. But JTF (strongly) implies otherwise.
[quote]jsbrook wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
jsbrook wrote:
Only you would find those posts thoughtful. JTF manages to link the Jews or at least the ‘Zionists bent on World Domination’ to every crisis no matter how tenuous and ludicrious the supposed connection.
You are making the mistake that people make when calling all Italians Mafiosi or Muslims suiche bombers. JTF is attacking superich Jews who use money to influence the world. Calling someone an anti-semite for pointing this out is incorrect.
Correct me if I’m wrong but his argument is NOT with most Jews.
He still continuously links Jews in positions of power to scandal and corruption even when their involvement is even less plausible than here. Far less plausible. And when Jews are involved scandals or corruption, political or otherwise, there are usually plenty of non-Jews involved in the same scandal. Superich Jews use money to influence the world. But no more than superich [insert other religion]. The religion of these cranks is never relevant. But JTF (strongly) implies otherwise.[/quote]
“no more than superich [insert other religion]”
Btw, its a race issue, not religious. The religious angle is just a means to an end.
FIVE out of the SIX Federal Reserve board members are Jewish. (It was five out of five, they only added a non-Jewish woman in July). Greenspan was Chairman for THIRTY YEARS – then Bush APPOINTED Bernake, another Jew.
The managing director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) Dominique Strauss-Kahn, is Jewish
Bush APPOINTED two Jews, in secession, to head the World Bank – both neocon PNAC members. The first was WOLFOWITZ – after his “success” with the Iraq war.
Apparently there ARE NO qualified representatives of other religions or races.
The fact that they represent no more than 3% of the entire population (3 out of every 100 people), how is it that ALL these people could possibly be (or should be) Jewish?
As Henry Ford said, [quote]“If the explanation of Jewish mastery at critical moments were “brains,” well and good, but if it were, it would be more evident to the people”[/quote]
No one rarely questions why blacks dominate and excel in sports, its obvious – not so with Jews in world finance.
And thats the point, you can’t have seven Jews at the highest echelons of world finance and then say it has nothing to do with Jews. I would LOVE nothing more than to praise the wonderful job their doing – but look where we are. They own it. People better start questioning it, and in a hurry.
And here we go…
Global financial crisis: does the world need a new banking ‘policeman’?
So, as the world’s central bankers gather this week in Washington DC for an IMF-World Bank conference to discuss the crisis, the big question they face is whether it is time to establish a global economic “policeman” to ensure the crash of 2008 can never be repeated.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/financialcrisis/3155563/Global-financial-crisis-does-the-world-need-a-new-banking-policeman.html
John McCain just stood up and called out Barney Frank and Chris Dodd as the co-conspiritors in the scandal!
Finally, John is showing us the record, and the facts. But will the Obama crowd believe the record?
It will now become obvious how 12 times Republicans CALLED FOR regulation of these agencies, only to be blocked by Dems.
[quote]Rockscar wrote:
John McCain just stood up and called out Barney Frank and Chris Dodd as the co-conspiritors in the scandal!
Finally, John is showing us the record, and the facts. But will the Obama crowd believe the record?
It will now become obvious how 12 times Republicans CALLED FOR regulation of these agencies, only to be blocked by Dems.[/quote]
A good step. But McCain needs to do a better job explaining. He needs to say that he was in support of regulation when APPROPRIATE and that deregulation is not inherently bad.
He’d also do well to make it hit home that BAD regulations supported by Democrats had MORE to do with the current crisis than deregulatory efforts (though I do think certain deregulatory initatives contributed). He missed some opportunities to address these issues in the debate.
He needs to do more than criticize for Fannie and Freddie. Because even those that agree may still be convinced that his support of deregulation over his career had more to do with the crisis.
He needs to say that most of the deregulatory efforts he supported were appropriate, those that weren’t received bipartisan support (ie. the repeal of Glass-Steagal; everyone fucked up), and that bad regulation by the Democrats encouraging banks to lower lending standards is a prime cause.
[quote]JustTheFacts wrote:
jsbrook wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
jsbrook wrote:
Only you would find those posts thoughtful. JTF manages to link the Jews or at least the ‘Zionists bent on World Domination’ to every crisis no matter how tenuous and ludicrious the supposed connection.
You are making the mistake that people make when calling all Italians Mafiosi or Muslims suiche bombers. JTF is attacking superich Jews who use money to influence the world. Calling someone an anti-semite for pointing this out is incorrect.
Correct me if I’m wrong but his argument is NOT with most Jews.
He still continuously links Jews in positions of power to scandal and corruption even when their involvement is even less plausible than here. Far less plausible. And when Jews are involved scandals or corruption, political or otherwise, there are usually plenty of non-Jews involved in the same scandal.
Superich Jews use money to influence the world. But no more than superich [insert other religion]. The religion of these cranks is never relevant. But JTF (strongly) implies otherwise.
“no more than superich [insert other religion]”
Btw, its a race issue, not religious. The religious angle is just a means to an end.
FIVE out of the SIX Federal Reserve board members are Jewish. (It was five out of five, they only added a non-Jewish woman in July). Greenspan was Chairman for THIRTY YEARS – then Bush APPOINTED Bernake, another Jew.
The managing director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) Dominique Strauss-Kahn, is Jewish
Bush APPOINTED two Jews, in secession, to head the World Bank – both neocon PNAC members. The first was WOLFOWITZ – after his “success” with the Iraq war.
Apparently there ARE NO qualified representatives of other religions or races.
The fact that they represent no more than 3% of the entire population (3 out of every 100 people), how is it that ALL these people could possibly be (or should be) Jewish?
As Henry Ford said, “If the explanation of Jewish mastery at critical moments were “brains,” well and good, but if it were, it would be more evident to the people”
No one rarely questions why blacks dominate and excel in sports, its obvious – not so with Jews in world finance.
And thats the point, you can’t have seven Jews at the highest echelons of world finance and then say it has nothing to do with Jews. I would LOVE nothing more than to praise the wonderful job their doing – but look where we are. They own it. People better start questioning it, and in a hurry.
And here we go…
Global financial crisis: does the world need a new banking ‘policeman’?
So, as the world’s central bankers gather this week in Washington DC for an IMF-World Bank conference to discuss the crisis, the big question they face is whether it is time to establish a global economic “policeman” to ensure the crash of 2008 can never be repeated.
You still have yet to show it’s BECAUSE they are Jewish. And what exactly is your theory? What’s their aim? What do they get out of mismangement? What’s your solution anyway? Quotas? Only so many Jews allowed in this business sector?
It makes no sense. The Christians or Muslims or Pagans who replace these ‘dammned Jews’ would undoubtedly do no better. And if not brains, guts, and making use of connections, what’s your explaination for ‘Jewish mastery?’
[quote]jsbrook wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
jsbrook wrote:
Only you would find those posts thoughtful. JTF manages to link the Jews or at least the ‘Zionists bent on World Domination’ to every crisis no matter how tenuous and ludicrious the supposed connection.
You are making the mistake that people make when calling all Italians Mafiosi or Muslims suiche bombers. JTF is attacking superich Jews who use money to influence the world. Calling someone an anti-semite for pointing this out is incorrect.
Correct me if I’m wrong but his argument is NOT with most Jews.
He still continuously links Jews in positions of power to scandal and corruption even when their involvement is even less plausible than here. Far less plausible. And when Jews are involved scandals or corruption, political or otherwise, there are usually plenty of non-Jews involved in the same scandal.
Superich Jews use money to influence the world. But no more than superich [insert other religion]. The religion of these cranks is never relevant. But JTF (strongly) implies otherwise.[/quote]
I’m willing to admit that religion may be a factor, if we can find evidence from the doctrines of that religion that the unsavory behavior corresponds to a particular doctrine (i.e. jihad fi sabil Allah and Surah 9:5).
If the Jews really are these evil people they’re made out to be by JTF, than why does the rest of goy Amerikkka keep electing them? Are our Jew puppeteers making us punch out those chads while we’re in the election booth?
Given the fact that people in Minnesota elected Allahu-akbaring jihad sympathizer Keith Ellison, (which can only be bad for their interests), I’d say we deserve whoever we elect, whether he be a Jew, Muslim, Christian, or Atheist. Willful lemmings deserve to be lead off a cliff is all I’m saying.
[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
jsbrook wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
jsbrook wrote:
Only you would find those posts thoughtful. JTF manages to link the Jews or at least the ‘Zionists bent on World Domination’ to every crisis no matter how tenuous and ludicrious the supposed connection.
You are making the mistake that people make when calling all Italians Mafiosi or Muslims suiche bombers. JTF is attacking superich Jews who use money to influence the world. Calling someone an anti-semite for pointing this out is incorrect.
Correct me if I’m wrong but his argument is NOT with most Jews.
He still continuously links Jews in positions of power to scandal and corruption even when their involvement is even less plausible than here. Far less plausible. And when Jews are involved scandals or corruption, political or otherwise, there are usually plenty of non-Jews involved in the same scandal.
Superich Jews use money to influence the world. But no more than superich [insert other religion]. The religion of these cranks is never relevant. But JTF (strongly) implies otherwise.
I’m willing to admit that religion may be a factor, if we can find evidence from the doctrines of that religion that the unsavory behavior corresponds to a particular doctrine (i.e. jihad fi sabil Allah and Surah 9:5).
If the Jews really are these evil people they’re made out to be by JTF, than why does the rest of goy Amerikkka keep electing them? Are our Jew puppeteers making us punch out those chads while we’re in the election booth?
Given the fact that people in Minnesota elected Allahu-akbaring jihad sympathizer Keith Ellison, (which can only be bad for their interests), I’d say we deserve whoever we elect, whether he be a Jew, Muslim, Christian, or Atheist. Willful lemmings deserve to be lead off a cliff is all I’m saying. [/quote]
Seriousy. His assertions defy believe. It’s the kind of dogma that’s been spouted against Jews every time they do well in a country where they are a minority relgion and culture. Somehow they are the root of all the problems, and they’ve managed to rise to positions of power through some kind of ‘evil sorcery.’
The Muslims are even trying to ban our Jewish dollies now. There goes our largest export. We’re freaking doomed.
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/arab-worlds-vice-squads-hunt-jewish-barbie-dolls/
[quote]katzenjammer wrote:
The Muslims are even trying to ban our Jewish dollies now. There goes our largest export. We’re freaking doomed.
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/arab-worlds-vice-squads-hunt-jewish-barbie-dolls/
[/quote]
Gee, I didn’t know Barbie was Jewish. Is she observant? What’s Ken’s religion? Is he an advocate of the Sun God or Poisedon, god of the oceans?
[quote]katzenjammer wrote:
The Muslims are even trying to ban our Jewish dollies now. There goes our largest export. We’re freaking doomed.
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/arab-worlds-vice-squads-hunt-jewish-barbie-dolls/
[/quote]
They attach the label “Jew” to anything deemed “haram.” Their paranoid Arab minds see Israel behind everything rather than who’s in the mirror, so they just attach “Jew” to the label.
In this case, rather than simply not buying the Barbie, a huge deal has to be made over it. You should read ShrinkWrapped’s postings called “The Arab Mind”:
They’ve got a mostly-hate relationship with their women, which was obviously passed down from Mohammed who owned several wives, married a six year old retarded girl (Aisha), made women cover themselves up, and promised pearl-faced boys to martyrs in heaven. Gender roles are utterly distorted there. Ask a soldier about “man-love Thursdays” as well.
[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
I’m willing to admit that religion may be a factor, if we can find evidence from the doctrines of that religion that the unsavory behavior corresponds to a particular doctrine (i.e. jihad fi sabil Allah and Surah 9:5).
If the Jews really are these evil people they’re made out to be by JTF, than why does the rest of goy Amerikkka keep electing them? Are our Jew puppeteers making us punch out those chads while we’re in the election booth?
Given the fact that people in Minnesota elected Allahu-akbaring jihad sympathizer Keith Ellison, (which can only be bad for their interests), I’d say we deserve whoever we elect, whether he be a Jew, Muslim, Christian, or Atheist. Willful lemmings deserve to be lead off a cliff is all I’m saying. [/quote]
Why do you assume the elections are legitimate? People who blow this off as a wacky conspiracy really don’t even care that voting machine security today is worse than its ever been. Its not even a partisan issue.
E-voting security results ‘awful,’ says Ohio secretary of state
Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner: "Oh no, no. When I finally saw the results of our [EVEREST] tests, I thought I was going to throw up.
I didn’t think it would be that bad. And it was – it was awful. I looked at it on a Saturday morning, and that night I went to bed and woke up [just before 4:00 on] Sunday morning going, “Oh my God.” I never wake up on the weekends – trust me."
Most Jews ever set to enter Congress
Jerusalem Post, Jan 2007
“It’s unprecedented that there have been so many [Jews] in so many positions of leadership in both houses,” Bloomfield said, using a Jewish simile for how that fact will affect support for Israel: Like chicken soup, it won’t hurt.
Elected, then PLACED “in so many positions of leadership in both houses”.
[quote]jsbrook wrote:
Seriousy. His assertions defy believe. It’s the kind of dogma that’s been spouted against Jews every time they do well in a country where they are a minority relgion and culture.
Somehow they are the root of all the problems, and they’ve managed to rise to positions of power through some kind of ‘evil sorcery.’ [/quote]
Your assertions imply that only Jews tell the truth and that no one else has ever had a point throughout history.
Feel free to point out the Jew that has been the standout, shining star of note from the past 8 years… Wolfowitz? Feith? Perle? Zakheim? Scooter Libby? Lieberman? Abramoff? Chertoff? Kristol? Greenspan? Bernake? Mukasey?
With all that Jew genius… I’m just sayin’
Top White House posts go to Jews
Not something I’d brag about… unless of course the idea isn’t to “make things better”.
Division of congressional posts seems to favor Jewish issues
http://www.jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/news/article/20070110Divisionofcongress.html
Do you think its anti-Semitic to ask why the “division of congressional posts seems to favor Jewish issues”? Who approved the $800 billion bailout?
Protocol 21:
[quote][i]"When the comedy is played out there emerges the fact that a debit and an exceedingly burdensome debit has been created. For the payment of interest it becomes necessary to have recourse to new loans, which do not swallow up but only add to the capital debt.
And when this credit is exhausted it becomes necessary by new taxes to cover, not the loan, BUT ONLY THE INTEREST ON IT. These taxes are a debit employed to cover a debit…
Later comes the time for conversions, but they diminish the payment of interest without covering the debt, and besides they cannot be made without the consent of the lenders; on announcing a conversion a proposal is made to return the money to those who are not willing to convert their paper.
If everybody expressed his unwillingness and demanded his money back, the government would be hoist on their own petard and would be found insolvent and unable to pay the proposed sums.
By good luck the subjects of the GOY governments, knowing nothing about financial affairs, have always preferred losses on exchange and diminution of interest to the risk of new investments of their moneys, and have thereby many a time enabled these governments to throw off their shoulders a debit of several millions…
We shall replace the money markets by grandiose government credit institutions, the object of which will be to fix the price of industrial values in accordance with government views.
These institutions will be in a position to fling upon the market five hundred millions of industrial paper in one day, or to buy up for the same amount. In this way all industrial undertakings will come into dependence upon us. You may imagine for yourselves what immense power we shall thereby secure for ourselves…"[/i][/quote]
This was written AT LEAST 20 years before the Federal Reserve Act.
Now the Jews are being blamed for the Bailout too? Gimme a break. I looked it up. There are 30 Jews in the House. And 435 total representatives. Do you even know how all the Jewish reps voted for the Bailout?
Arlen Specter’s Jewish. And he’s done great things for my state. Feel free to point out CHRISTIAN politicans and appointees that are standouts. They’re all a pretty sorry lot whatever they’re religion.
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion has been universally renounced. It has been PROVEN to be a plagiarism, literary forgery,fraud, and a hoax. The text has failed to pass any scholarly standards of authentication as an alleged historical document or record.
This is universally accepted by all credible historians. Bringing it up just demonstrates your lack of credibility.
I don’t want to argue it or continue to discuess it. There’s no point. You’re just grasping at straws and telling lies.
[quote]jsbrook wrote:
Now the Jews are being blamed for the Bailout too? Gimme a break. I looked it up. There are 30 Jews in the House. And 435 total representatives. Do you even know how all the Jewish reps voted for the Bailout?
[/quote]
The Jew senator Feinstein appointed my goy sister to the Air Force academy as well. My Jew doctor helped me out with a pain condition. The list goes on and on, and is mostly explained by the Ashkenazi IQ, not some elaborate conspiracy.