Are CCW Laws Constitutional

Off Topic
41

[quote]Eli B wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Eli B wrote:

[quote]clip11 wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]mazzic1083 wrote:
but don’t see the need for our general public to carry hand guns on a daily [/quote]

I don’t care if you think I need to carry or not.[/quote]

And thats what the anti-gun lobby doesnt get. The way i see it, if you are opposed to gun ownership or carrying a gun, YOU don’t do it!!! Dont try to get everyone else to do what you think they should do. After all, who are you???[/quote]

Who am I? A guy that doesn’t want to get caught in the crossfire. Your argument works for abortion, in that I am not in danger of getting aborted if someone else decides to get one. I am in danger of getting shot by some knucklehead with road rage.

BTW personal experience: Exited a strip club as two retards got in a fight over a pool game. Got caught up in the crowd as the fight spilled outside and guns were drawn and shots fired. Did not enjoy that much.
[/quote]

There are personal stories on both sides.

I personally have had to scare off packs of coyotes from attacking livestock and my dog. I’m glad I could do more than shake my fist at them.

You going to take personal responsibility if you take my guns? Cause you could get me killed by taking my ability to defend myself. In my opinion the right to life guarantees the right to arms. What exactly is the right to life without the ability to defend it?[/quote]

A rifle or some variety of long gun would suit your coyote scaring needs I imagine.

Im not crazy anti-gun I just think hand-gun restrictions should be pretty tight. My faith in the good judgement of the general public is at an all time low and sinking fast. I know im not winning any argument here just my opinion for what its worth two cents and all that.[/quote]

Well what about Chicago that has heavy hand gun restrictions? Theyre considering calling the military in to get the violence under control. Or Washington D.C. that also has heavy handgun restrictions, but yet still was the number one city for murder for a few years running. And those years it wasn’t number one it was up in the top five. London, England also has heavy restrictions, but it seems that there instead of getting hit with a 9mm bullet you’ll get hacked to death with a machete or bludgeoned with a baseball bat.

Now give an example where heavy handgun restrictions have actually worked.

42

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Eli B wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Eli B wrote:

[quote]clip11 wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]mazzic1083 wrote:
but don’t see the need for our general public to carry hand guns on a daily [/quote]

I don’t care if you think I need to carry or not.[/quote]

And thats what the anti-gun lobby doesnt get. The way i see it, if you are opposed to gun ownership or carrying a gun, YOU don’t do it!!! Dont try to get everyone else to do what you think they should do. After all, who are you???[/quote]

Who am I? A guy that doesn’t want to get caught in the crossfire. Your argument works for abortion, in that I am not in danger of getting aborted if someone else decides to get one. I am in danger of getting shot by some knucklehead with road rage.

BTW personal experience: Exited a strip club as two retards got in a fight over a pool game. Got caught up in the crowd as the fight spilled outside and guns were drawn and shots fired. Did not enjoy that much.
[/quote]

There are personal stories on both sides.

I personally have had to scare off packs of coyotes from attacking livestock and my dog. I’m glad I could do more than shake my fist at them.

You going to take personal responsibility if you take my guns? Cause you could get me killed by taking my ability to defend myself. In my opinion the right to life guarantees the right to arms. What exactly is the right to life without the ability to defend it?[/quote]

A rifle or some variety of long gun would suit your coyote scaring needs I imagine.

Im not crazy anti-gun I just think hand-gun restrictions should be pretty tight. My faith in the good judgement of the general public is at an all time low and sinking fast. I know im not winning any argument here just my opinion for what its worth two cents and all that.[/quote]

Couldn’t be more perfect. A rifle would be hard to take on a jog.[/quote]

Ok fuck thats awesome.

On second thought what about non-lethal options? Taser?

I feel like I’m trolling here but its more like devils advocate. I am aware that you all probably take the responsibility of carrying very seriously and try to do so safely.

43

[quote]clip11 wrote:

[quote]Eli B wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Eli B wrote:

[quote]clip11 wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]mazzic1083 wrote:
but don’t see the need for our general public to carry hand guns on a daily [/quote]

I don’t care if you think I need to carry or not.[/quote]

And thats what the anti-gun lobby doesnt get. The way i see it, if you are opposed to gun ownership or carrying a gun, YOU don’t do it!!! Dont try to get everyone else to do what you think they should do. After all, who are you???[/quote]

Who am I? A guy that doesn’t want to get caught in the crossfire. Your argument works for abortion, in that I am not in danger of getting aborted if someone else decides to get one. I am in danger of getting shot by some knucklehead with road rage.

BTW personal experience: Exited a strip club as two retards got in a fight over a pool game. Got caught up in the crowd as the fight spilled outside and guns were drawn and shots fired. Did not enjoy that much.
[/quote]

There are personal stories on both sides.

I personally have had to scare off packs of coyotes from attacking livestock and my dog. I’m glad I could do more than shake my fist at them.

You going to take personal responsibility if you take my guns? Cause you could get me killed by taking my ability to defend myself. In my opinion the right to life guarantees the right to arms. What exactly is the right to life without the ability to defend it?[/quote]

A rifle or some variety of long gun would suit your coyote scaring needs I imagine.

Im not crazy anti-gun I just think hand-gun restrictions should be pretty tight. My faith in the good judgement of the general public is at an all time low and sinking fast. I know im not winning any argument here just my opinion for what its worth two cents and all that.[/quote]

Well what about Chicago that has heavy hand gun restrictions? Theyre considering calling the military in to get the violence under control. Or Washington D.C. that also has heavy handgun restrictions, but yet still was the number one city for murder for a few years running. And those years it wasn’t number one it was up in the top five. London, England also has heavy restrictions, but it seems that there instead of getting hit with a 9mm bullet you’ll get hacked to death with a machete or bludgeoned with a baseball bat.

Now give an example where heavy handgun restrictions have actually worked.[/quote]

I can give no such example. Cats outta the bag with the whole handgun thing.

44

[quote]Eli B wrote:

[quote]clip11 wrote:

[quote]Eli B wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Eli B wrote:

[quote]clip11 wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]mazzic1083 wrote:
but don’t see the need for our general public to carry hand guns on a daily [/quote]

I don’t care if you think I need to carry or not.[/quote]

And thats what the anti-gun lobby doesnt get. The way i see it, if you are opposed to gun ownership or carrying a gun, YOU don’t do it!!! Dont try to get everyone else to do what you think they should do. After all, who are you???[/quote]

Who am I? A guy that doesn’t want to get caught in the crossfire. Your argument works for abortion, in that I am not in danger of getting aborted if someone else decides to get one. I am in danger of getting shot by some knucklehead with road rage.

BTW personal experience: Exited a strip club as two retards got in a fight over a pool game. Got caught up in the crowd as the fight spilled outside and guns were drawn and shots fired. Did not enjoy that much.
[/quote]

There are personal stories on both sides.

I personally have had to scare off packs of coyotes from attacking livestock and my dog. I’m glad I could do more than shake my fist at them.

You going to take personal responsibility if you take my guns? Cause you could get me killed by taking my ability to defend myself. In my opinion the right to life guarantees the right to arms. What exactly is the right to life without the ability to defend it?[/quote]

A rifle or some variety of long gun would suit your coyote scaring needs I imagine.

Im not crazy anti-gun I just think hand-gun restrictions should be pretty tight. My faith in the good judgement of the general public is at an all time low and sinking fast. I know im not winning any argument here just my opinion for what its worth two cents and all that.[/quote]

Well what about Chicago that has heavy hand gun restrictions? Theyre considering calling the military in to get the violence under control. Or Washington D.C. that also has heavy handgun restrictions, but yet still was the number one city for murder for a few years running. And those years it wasn’t number one it was up in the top five.

London, England also has heavy restrictions, but it seems that there instead of getting hit with a 9mm bullet you’ll get hacked to death with a machete or bludgeoned with a baseball bat.

Now give an example where heavy handgun restrictions have actually worked.[/quote]

I can give no such example. Cats outta the bag with the whole handgun thing.
[/quote]

Checkmate.