Any Dudes Wanna Get Married?

[quote]forlife wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
Let’s cut to the chase: this is not about “freedom.” This is about forcing individuals who morally disagree with homosexual “marriage” to recognize it as valid.

Gays can currently get “married” if they want in the liberal church or reformed temple or wiccan tribal circle of their chosing, enter into legal agreements with the same force and effect as a marriage, but they can’t use the power of the State to force people who morally disagree with thier position to recognize it valid.

They want to have the power of the State to force their views and lifestyles on others.

That’s the question:

Should the State have the legal authority to force people who disagree with gay marriage to accept it?

The answer is “no.”

The solution, if one is convinved sodomites are a protected class, to remove the power of the State to force people to recognize any marraige, and to put it back into the private and religous realm where it belongs.[/quote]

As usual, when confronted with the actual facts as concluded by the major health organizations, people backpedal and finally admit that it really is a moral debate after all.

We get it. You’re disgusted by gays and don’t think we should be able to marry.

Fortunately, the majority of Americans disagree with you, and gays are finally making progress toward equality in this country.[/quote]

By all the latest referendums the majority of Americans DO NOT want homosexual marriage in their state. I’d post the many articles but you’d only say that I found them in right wing papers…like the NY Times.

You are truly a nut case.

[quote]forlife wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
An organisation doesn’t have to be ‘morally corrupt’ to present findings that are wrong. They could be just wrong or they could be conducted by people who are ideologically predisposed to expect/want consciously or unconciously certain results. They could be fanatics prepared to deliberately distort results. There’s certainly no abscence of this in mainstream science and academia.[/quote]

So prove the American Medical Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Psychiatric Association, American Psychological Association, National Association of Social Workers, American Counseling Association, American Association of School Administrators, American Federation of Teachers, American School Health Association, National Education Association, and Surgeon General are all “just wrong”, or that every single one of them is “ideologically predisposed to expect/want consciously or unconsciously certain results”.

What’s more likely:

Either every single major health organization is under a confirmatory bias, OR

You and others with an acknowledged aversion to homosexuality are under a confirmatory bias?

I’ll put my money on the scientific organizations dedicated to fostering human health.[/quote]

I’ve already said I’m not disputing the results of the studies you have posted. Whether a gay is gay because of biology/environment/whatever doesn’t interest me.

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]forlife wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
An organisation doesn’t have to be ‘morally corrupt’ to present findings that are wrong. They could be just wrong or they could be conducted by people who are ideologically predisposed to expect/want consciously or unconciously certain results. They could be fanatics prepared to deliberately distort results. There’s certainly no abscence of this in mainstream science and academia.[/quote]

So prove the American Medical Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Psychiatric Association, American Psychological Association, National Association of Social Workers, American Counseling Association, American Association of School Administrators, American Federation of Teachers, American School Health Association, National Education Association, and Surgeon General are all “just wrong”, or that every single one of them is “ideologically predisposed to expect/want consciously or unconsciously certain results”.

What’s more likely:

Either every single major health organization is under a confirmatory bias, OR

You and others with an acknowledged aversion to homosexuality are under a confirmatory bias?

I’ll put my money on the scientific organizations dedicated to fostering human health.[/quote]

This is boring, lets see whether I can make a better argument.

While it may be true that changing your sexual orientation might make the one changing it less healthy, that does not necessarily mean that homosexuality is not a mental disease.

True, it is no longer classified as such, but it was for a long time and definitions of mental disorders are necessarily ideological/political, especially in a climate of state sponsored medicine and research where the definition of what a disease is can have enormous financial implications.

If we look at it without any label attached, the homosexual mind, just like the depressed, bi polar or schizophrenic mind correlates strongly with other diseases, drug use and suicide, which means at the very least that a strong point can be made that homosexuality should be classified as a mental disorder.

[/quote]

No, you see that’s impossible because the APA which is controlled by the gay lobby changed the definition of mental disorder. That means that now everyone who had a mental problem because they wanted to put their penis in another mans rectum is now mentally healthy. I can’t wait until they do that for alcoholics. I have an uncle who can’t stop drinking and when they change the definition he won’t have to try quitting anymore/ After all every time he tried quitting it really ticked him off.

Miraculous, one stroke of the pen and he’ll be healed!

[quote]forlife wrote:

We get it. You’re disgusted by gays and don’t think we should be able to marry.

[/quote]

You can’t marry because ‘marriage’ is a union between a man and a woman. Just like I can’t fly a car you can’t marry a man.

I want to make note of something very interesting. I posted information regarding the poor state of mental health of homosexuals in the Netherlands. And we all know that marriage has been legal there for 10 years. No one is trying to change them and everyone accepts them for who they say they are. Yet…their depression, anxiety and suicide rate is still the highest in their country.

And no comment from forlife rebutting this?

uh huh…

[quote]ZEB wrote:
I can’t wait until they do that for alcoholics. I have an uncle who can’t stop drinking and when they change the definition he won’t have to try quitting anymore/ After all every time he tried quitting it really ticked him off.

Miraculous, one stroke of the pen and he’ll be healed![/quote]

That’s just silly. Alcoholism shouldn’t really be classified as a disease.

[quote]kaaleppi wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:
I can’t wait until they do that for alcoholics. I have an uncle who can’t stop drinking and when they change the definition he won’t have to try quitting anymore/ After all every time he tried quitting it really ticked him off.

Miraculous, one stroke of the pen and he’ll be healed![/quote]

That’s just silly. Alcoholism shouldn’t really be classified as a disease.[/quote]

Its a lifestyle.

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]kaaleppi wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:
I can’t wait until they do that for alcoholics. I have an uncle who can’t stop drinking and when they change the definition he won’t have to try quitting anymore/ After all every time he tried quitting it really ticked him off.

Miraculous, one stroke of the pen and he’ll be healed![/quote]

That’s just silly. Alcoholism shouldn’t really be classified as a disease.[/quote]

Its a lifestyle.[/quote]

Damn right.

Alcohol is merely a cure for uncontrollable shaking and delerium tremons…

[quote]forlife wrote:
majority of Americans disagree with you[/quote]

Really, then how come when a state brings a SSM bill up for vote the citizens vote it down and it takes a bunch of liberals lying to pass the bill and keep it from being voted on by citizens?

[quote]ZEB wrote:
I want to make note of something very interesting. I posted information regarding the poor state of mental health of homosexuals in the Netherlands. And we all know that marriage has been legal there for 10 years. No one is trying to change them and everyone accepts them for who they say they are. Yet…their depression, anxiety and suicide rate is still the highest in their country.

And no comment from forlife rebutting this?

uh huh… [/quote]

Because it’s about the brotherhood. They feel the struggle for their American brothers.

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]forlife wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
An organisation doesn’t have to be ‘morally corrupt’ to present findings that are wrong. They could be just wrong or they could be conducted by people who are ideologically predisposed to expect/want consciously or unconciously certain results. They could be fanatics prepared to deliberately distort results. There’s certainly no abscence of this in mainstream science and academia.[/quote]

So prove the American Medical Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Psychiatric Association, American Psychological Association, National Association of Social Workers, American Counseling Association, American Association of School Administrators, American Federation of Teachers, American School Health Association, National Education Association, and Surgeon General are all “just wrong”, or that every single one of them is “ideologically predisposed to expect/want consciously or unconsciously certain results”.

What’s more likely:

Either every single major health organization is under a confirmatory bias, OR

You and others with an acknowledged aversion to homosexuality are under a confirmatory bias?

I’ll put my money on the scientific organizations dedicated to fostering human health.[/quote]

This is boring, lets see whether I can make a better argument.

While it may be true that changing your sexual orientation might make the one changing it less healthy, that does not necessarily mean that homosexuality is not a mental disease.

True, it is no longer classified as such, but it was for a long time and definitions of mental disorders are necessarily ideological/political, especially in a climate of state sponsored medicine and research where the definition of what a disease is can have enormous financial implications.

If we look at it without any label attached, the homosexual mind, just like the depressed, bi polar or schizophrenic mind correlates strongly with other diseases, drug use and suicide, which means at the very least that a strong point can be made that homosexuality should be classified as a mental disorder.

[/quote]

If you actually bothered to read the conclusions of the major health organizations, you would see that unanimously they conclude based on 40 years of research that homosexuality is NOT a mental disease, and that any emotional disturbance can be traced to social rejection.

Want to help gays? Encourage them to be who they are, instead of telling them they are mentally ill and pushing them into crackpot reparative programs that double the risk of suicidal thoughts, alcohol abuse, drug abuse, anxiety, and depression.

I wasn’t in great emotional health during my years in the closet. Since coming out, I’m much happier and more integrated as a human being. Imagine what it would be like to grow up being told that you are an abomination and mentally ill. Thankfully, this message is changing as society becomes more educated.

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]forlife wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
An organisation doesn’t have to be ‘morally corrupt’ to present findings that are wrong. They could be just wrong or they could be conducted by people who are ideologically predisposed to expect/want consciously or unconciously certain results. They could be fanatics prepared to deliberately distort results. There’s certainly no abscence of this in mainstream science and academia.[/quote]

So prove the American Medical Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Psychiatric Association, American Psychological Association, National Association of Social Workers, American Counseling Association, American Association of School Administrators, American Federation of Teachers, American School Health Association, National Education Association, and Surgeon General are all “just wrong”, or that every single one of them is “ideologically predisposed to expect/want consciously or unconsciously certain results”.

What’s more likely:

Either every single major health organization is under a confirmatory bias, OR

You and others with an acknowledged aversion to homosexuality are under a confirmatory bias?

I’ll put my money on the scientific organizations dedicated to fostering human health.[/quote]

I’ve already said I’m not disputing the results of the studies you have posted. Whether a gay is gay because of biology/environment/whatever doesn’t interest me.
[/quote]

If you’re not disputing the results, then you’re agreeing with the major health organizations that homosexuality is not a mental illness, that people don’t choose their orientation, that you can’t change your orientation, and that trying to do so can be damaging.

[quote]kaaleppi wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:
I can’t wait until they do that for alcoholics. I have an uncle who can’t stop drinking and when they change the definition he won’t have to try quitting anymore/ After all every time he tried quitting it really ticked him off.

Miraculous, one stroke of the pen and he’ll be healed![/quote]

That’s just silly. Alcoholism shouldn’t really be classified as a disease.[/quote]

Oh but it is.

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]forlife wrote:
majority of Americans disagree with you[/quote]

Really, then how come when a state brings a SSM bill up for vote the citizens vote it down and it takes a bunch of liberals lying to pass the bill and keep it from being voted on by citizens?[/quote]

Exactly! No one wants gay marriage in their own state. It has lost every where that it has been up for a referendum.

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:
I want to make note of something very interesting. I posted information regarding the poor state of mental health of homosexuals in the Netherlands. And we all know that marriage has been legal there for 10 years. No one is trying to change them and everyone accepts them for who they say they are. Yet…their depression, anxiety and suicide rate is still the highest in their country.

And no comment from forlife rebutting this?

uh huh… [/quote]

Because it’s about the brotherhood. They feel the struggle for their American brothers.[/quote]

And that’s probably the line of bull that forlife would have used had you not just taken it as a joke.

[quote]forlife wrote:

If you actually bothered to read the conclusions of the major health organizations, you would see that unanimously they conclude based on 40 years of research that homosexuality is NOT a mental disease, and that any emotional disturbance can be traced to social rejection.[/quote]

But what about the situation in the Netherlands where homosexual marriage has been legal for 10 years and every one accepts homosexuals as they are. Yet, they’re still at the top of the population for being anxious, depressed and suicidal.

What say you on that one forlife? Don’t want to address it?

Uh huh…

But that failed in the Netherlands…

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]kaaleppi wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:
I can’t wait until they do that for alcoholics. I have an uncle who can’t stop drinking and when they change the definition he won’t have to try quitting anymore/ After all every time he tried quitting it really ticked him off.

Miraculous, one stroke of the pen and he’ll be healed![/quote]

That’s just silly. Alcoholism shouldn’t really be classified as a disease.[/quote]

Oh but it is.[/quote]

Yes indeed it is?

[quote]forlife wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]forlife wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
An organisation doesn’t have to be ‘morally corrupt’ to present findings that are wrong. They could be just wrong or they could be conducted by people who are ideologically predisposed to expect/want consciously or unconciously certain results. They could be fanatics prepared to deliberately distort results. There’s certainly no abscence of this in mainstream science and academia.[/quote]

So prove the American Medical Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Psychiatric Association, American Psychological Association, National Association of Social Workers, American Counseling Association, American Association of School Administrators, American Federation of Teachers, American School Health Association, National Education Association, and Surgeon General are all “just wrong”, or that every single one of them is “ideologically predisposed to expect/want consciously or unconsciously certain results”.

What’s more likely:

Either every single major health organization is under a confirmatory bias, OR

You and others with an acknowledged aversion to homosexuality are under a confirmatory bias?

I’ll put my money on the scientific organizations dedicated to fostering human health.[/quote]

I’ve already said I’m not disputing the results of the studies you have posted. Whether a gay is gay because of biology/environment/whatever doesn’t interest me.
[/quote]

If you’re not disputing the results, then you’re agreeing with the major health organizations that homosexuality is not a mental illness, that people don’t choose their orientation, that you can’t change your orientation, and that trying to do so can be damaging.
[/quote]

Funny how that works. You say that trying to change can be damaging and yet all the statistics prove that NOT doing so IS very damaging.

[quote]forlife wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]forlife wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
An organisation doesn’t have to be ‘morally corrupt’ to present findings that are wrong. They could be just wrong or they could be conducted by people who are ideologically predisposed to expect/want consciously or unconciously certain results. They could be fanatics prepared to deliberately distort results. There’s certainly no abscence of this in mainstream science and academia.[/quote]

So prove the American Medical Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Psychiatric Association, American Psychological Association, National Association of Social Workers, American Counseling Association, American Association of School Administrators, American Federation of Teachers, American School Health Association, National Education Association, and Surgeon General are all “just wrong”, or that every single one of them is “ideologically predisposed to expect/want consciously or unconsciously certain results”.

What’s more likely:

Either every single major health organization is under a confirmatory bias, OR

You and others with an acknowledged aversion to homosexuality are under a confirmatory bias?

I’ll put my money on the scientific organizations dedicated to fostering human health.[/quote]

This is boring, lets see whether I can make a better argument.

While it may be true that changing your sexual orientation might make the one changing it less healthy, that does not necessarily mean that homosexuality is not a mental disease.

True, it is no longer classified as such, but it was for a long time and definitions of mental disorders are necessarily ideological/political, especially in a climate of state sponsored medicine and research where the definition of what a disease is can have enormous financial implications.

If we look at it without any label attached, the homosexual mind, just like the depressed, bi polar or schizophrenic mind correlates strongly with other diseases, drug use and suicide, which means at the very least that a strong point can be made that homosexuality should be classified as a mental disorder.

[/quote]

If you actually bothered to read the conclusions of the major health organizations, you would see that unanimously they conclude based on 40 years of research that homosexuality is NOT a mental disease, and that any emotional disturbance can be traced to social rejection.

Want to help gays? Encourage them to be who they are, instead of telling them they are mentally ill and pushing them into crackpot reparative programs that double the risk of suicidal thoughts, alcohol abuse, drug abuse, anxiety, and depression.

I wasn’t in great emotional health during my years in the closet. Since coming out, I’m much happier and more integrated as a human being. Imagine what it would be like to grow up being told that you are an abomination and mentally ill. Thankfully, this message is changing as society becomes more educated.
[/quote]

What causes what is really just conjecture, there is no such thing as measurable psychological causality as long as you do not get strictly behaviorist.

Also, maybe schizophrenics or bi polar people have additional problems too, because of how their environment reacts to them.

That does not mean though that their mental attitude is not far outside the norm and that it correlates strongly with other diseases.

The same is true for homosexuality.

Just replace homosexual with bi polar whenever you bring up an argument and see if it makes sense to, it makes for a better presentation no matter on which side you fall on this issue.

So:

Fact: Homosexuality strongly correlates with diseases, drug use and suicide.

Interpretation: entirely up to you, but that is just what it is, an interpretation.