[quote]benmoore wrote:
Westclock wrote:
benmoore wrote:
Westclock wrote:
downintucson wrote:
Thanks Westclock. So, this is the reason (one of them, at least) behind stacking compounds instead of bridging them, right?
Well stacking is mostly so you can run several different drugs at once.
The drugs synergize with each other for better gains if done properly.
But yes it also keeps cycles short.
The less your shut down, the better from a recovery standpoint.
4 weeks you bounce right back with an SERM, 8 weeks might drag a little more.
And you want to bounce back quickly with PH’s, because they dont give great gains, you can end up losing everything you got from the cycle simply because you cant recover fast enough.
Interesting considering how common 8 week bold cycles seem to be.
People do odd cycles all the time, many of them are decently successful.
People do deca only cycles, which is just moronic, but they still make progress. Just because something isn’t ideal doesn’t mean it will not work, and doesn’t mean it isn’t done.
Been thinking even more about this cycle.
I think I would definatly like to run havoc at 40mg ED for 4 weeks minimum.
I WOULD like to run hdrol alongside it.
I am wondering however - since hdrol takes a while to kick in - for the first 1-2 weeks would there be any reason why it would be a bad idea to run at a lower dose… say 50mg? (I do realise you feel that anything under 50mg is a waste).
Im just looking at minimising liver risk for two methyls:
Week 1: Havoc 40mg, Hdrol 50mg
Week 2: Havoc 40mg, Hdrol 50mg
Week 3: Havoc 40mg, Hdrol 75mg
Weel 4: Havoc 40mg, Hdrol 75mg
Week 5: Hdrol 100mg
Week 6: Hdrol 100mg
Or Weeks 1-4 could be ran at 75mg straight?
[/quote]
I would not run less than 75 but certainly it is up to you.
Either way, the 25 mg isnt going to make or break the cycle, your not going to see liver failure at 75 if you don’t see it at 50.
I would run atleast 75 mg/day