[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]andrew_live wrote:
he actually said he hadnt been touched or anything as a kid and then later talked about getting the trauma out of his system.[/quote]
Yeah. He contradicts himself several times during the interview, so much so that he doesn’t offer a credible explanation of why he wrote the book in the first place. Which in itself is weird.
If he’s never been a pedo or been the victim of one, where does this “trauma” come from? And why did he think that writing the equivalent of “A Pedo’s Guide To Dating” would be an appropriate outlet for it?
I’m not trying to psychoanalyze the guy, but things don’t add up. From what I gather from the interview, he is trying to present the book as a method of how pedophilia should be a mutual mutually pleasurable, trauma-free experience between adult and child.
His logic is that if the victim enjoys the experience, then there is no ‘victim’ to speak of.
[/quote]
Well, he’s clearly lying. I applauded his bravery for standing there and answering questions on camera, but his bravery was borne of sociopathic and other mental issues. Guy is a fucking loon no doubt. I wanted to explode his face when he talked about knowing 4 year olds with a certain mental maturity. It’s clear to me he’s a pedo. Would love to know how his brothers and sisters feel since he mentioned nieces and nephews. Now THAT would be an interesting interview.[/quote]
I don’t even know if it is bravery. I’m trying to “reverse engineer” the situation: who would want to publish a book on pedophilia? The guy is standing there and answering questions, but his responses are rambling and contradictory.
He is constantly trying to justify pedophilia, even though he claims that he was never a victim : he says in the vid that his only sexual flirtation with a child was with a “ten year old girl”, and he implies that she was the instigator, with significant pride, I might add but he doesn’t disclose his own age at the time (overcompensation there: a middle aged guy boasting about a sexual liason with a ten year old decades before is a red flag).
The "justification " is the key to all of this. The guy is probably the victim of sexual abuse at the hands of an older male. It wouldn’t surprise me if his abuse came about during a strictly religious upbringing (he talks about religion a lot).
The book is the equivalent of a rape victim taking a shower.
I don’t think he realizes the damage he’s inflicting with this book.
