[quote]Chushin wrote:
orion wrote:
However, I agree, the language of Goebbels, Mengele and Himmler is probably not for you.
Corrected it for you, Deutsche bag.[/quote]
I agree.
Even those would be an impossible role model for you.
You could try to emulate a baboon?
I´m forgetting that you already are…
[quote]lixy wrote:
???
[/quote]
It’s hilarious that your handlers thought you would be a valuable propaganda tool but we’ve turned the tables on them. You’re a barometer; every time you respond to something we do with your propaganda, we know we’re headed down the right path.
As your bile has gotten more desperate and more frantic Al-Qaeda has become more dysfunctional and the situation in Iraq has become more and more stable. Do you even know what organization is providing you with information and logistical support, or do you report to anonymous handlers?
Interesting insight. I’m inclined to agree.
Every “debate” with lixy, on whatever the topic, is supported in his side by unsubstantiated assertions, ad hominem, or faux ignorance if pinned down.
[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
Every “debate” with lixy, on whatever the topic, is supported in his side by unsubstantiated assertions, ad hominem, [/quote]
You got that right.
Of course Al-Qaeda’s losing. It’s just around five pissed off guys, right?
[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
Who cares where they were before 2003?
[/quote]
Uhh, wasn’t that one of the reasons we dropped bombs on Iraqis to begin with, this unsubstantiated claim that Al Queda and Saddam where “Partners in Eeevil”?
I would think the whole Bush Administration should care if they were in Iraq prior to the invasion.
Well, seeing the aftermath first hand, we probably should have checked with Iraqis before choosing the ground to fight a terrorist organization on. You know, since it was their land?
Hate to burst your bubble, but the individuals shooting indirect fire at the FOB I’m on aren’t Al-Queda. There would be resistance if Al-Queda were here or not. Iraq will not be free and prosperous as long as the occupier (ie. us) is in Iraq.
Dustin
[quote]Dustin wrote:
Hate to burst your bubble, but the individuals shooting indirect fire at the FOB I’m on aren’t Al-Queda. There would be resistance if Al-Queda were here or not. Iraq will not be free and prosperous as long as the occupier (ie. us) is in Iraq.
Dustin[/quote]
So, what’s your take on it Dustin. We’re in Iraq and we can’t undo what we have done.
Do you think if the US pulled out now there would be more bloodshed?
Don’t you agree that the US is doing all it can, considering the situation, to stop the bloodshed, or do you agree with people like Al-Sistani and Al-Sadr who claim we are not doing enough, should get out and let them clean up the mess on their own?
If we did get out, should we continue to arm the resistance to Al-Qaeda, or leave the united tribal leaders hanging?
DELETE
[quote]Gkhan wrote:
Do you think if the US pulled out now there would be more bloodshed?
[/quote]
If we listen to what Iraqis are saying, then we should leave. There have been numerous scientific opinion polls (Brookings Institute for example) that give us a pretty clear indication that Iraqis don’t want us in their country.
http://www.iraqanalysis.org/tag/Opinion%20polls
I think the U.S military has done about as good a job as anyone could have hoped for. We were put in a crappy position to begin with.
We should let the people of Iraq determine there own future. The only way to do this is by leaving.
[quote]
If we did get out, should we continue to arm the resistance to Al-Qaeda, or leave the united tribal leaders hanging?
DELETE[/quote]
I think Al-Sadr and his Army would do just fine handling Al-Qaeda. I don’t think that’s our concern though.
I’ve been in this miserable hell-hole for over 4 months now. I can guarantee you that we are not going to leave anytime soon. In fact, I believe Iraq will turn into a hardship tour similar to Korea. We’ll probably have a military presence here for the foreseeable future.
Dustin
[quote]Dustin wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
Who cares where they were before 2003?
Uhh, wasn’t that one of the reasons we dropped bombs on Iraqis to begin with, this unsubstantiated claim that Al Queda and Saddam where “Partners in Eeevil”?
[/quote]
No.
Is that how war is fought? Seriously, you caanot believe that.
[quote]
They could have stayed home and let Iraq be free and prosperous for the first time but instead they came to die.
Hate to burst your bubble, but the individuals shooting indirect fire at the FOB I’m on aren’t Al-Queda. There would be resistance if Al-Queda were here or not. Iraq will not be free and prosperous as long as the occupier (ie. us) is in Iraq.
Dustin[/quote]
I understand there are other groups but AQ was the most dangerous and did the most damage . They committed the biggest acts of terrorism with the intent of starting sectarian violence.
[quote]Sifu wrote:
LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
Chushin wrote:
German is not a Romance language. And English is one of the most difficult.
English is a Germanic language with a fair amount of French. It is a common myth that it is a difficult language to learn but that is not true, English is actually one of the easier languages to learn. German and the Romance languages are way harder to learn than English for one simple reason, English doesn’t use genders. Word gender makes learning a language way more difficult.
For those who don’t know what word gender is:
In linguistics, grammatical genders, sometimes also called noun classes, are classes of nouns reflected in the behavior of associated words; every noun must belong to one of the classes and there should be very few which belong to several classes at once.[1][2]
If a language distinguishes between masculine and feminine gender, for instance, then each noun belongs to one of those two genders; in order to correctly decline any noun and any modifier or other type of word affecting that noun, one must identify whether the noun is feminine or masculine. The term “grammatical gender” is mostly used for Indo-European languages, many of which follow the pattern just described. Modern English, however, is normally described as lacking grammatical gender.[3]
The linguistic notion of grammatical gender is distinguished from the biological and social notion of natural gender, although they interact closely in many languages. Both grammatical and natural gender can have linguistic effects in a given language.
Although some authors use the term “noun class” as a synonym or an extension of “grammatical gender”, for others they are separate concepts.
In German there are three words for the word “the” der, die, das. One is male, one is female and one is nueter. So you have more words to learn and you have to also know the gender of all the other words you will use in a sentence with that word so you can use the correct gender of noun with it. There are entire classes of nouns where you have to learn three times as many words in order to speak German with correct grammer.
Grammatical gender is a layer of complexity that English did away with. Complexity makes learning harder. This is part of the reason why so many people speak English as a second language but English speakers have a hard time learning other languages, because they are not used to the complex rules of grammatical gender. [/quote]
plus a formal and informal way of adressing someone which of course alters the declination of the words you use…
–PROTOCOL No. 9
Al-Qaeda Doesn’t Exist
Probe of USS Cole Bombing Unravels
Plotters Freed in Yemen; U.S. Efforts Frustrated
Washington Post
May 4, 2008
ADEN, Yemen – Almost eight years after al-Qaeda nearly sank the USS Cole with an explosives-stuffed motorboat, killing 17 sailors, all the defendants convicted in the attack have escaped from prison or been freed by Yemeni officials…
The collapse of the Cole investigation offers a revealing case study of the U.S. government’s failure to bring al-Qaeda operatives and their leaders to justice for some of the most devastating attacks on American targets over the past decade…
SITE red-faced as Islamist ‘Washington ruin’ image turns out to be from Fallout 3 game
Telegraph
May 30, 2008
The SITE Intelligence Group said that the image, showing a ruined Capitol Building in Washington, was created by extremists as part of discussions about the feasibility of nuclear strikes against the US and Britain.
The images appeared in a video, called Nuclear Jihad: The Ultimate Terror, posted on two password-protected websites, al-Ekhlass and al-Hesbah, believed to be affiliated with al-Qaeda.
SITE also released translated several chatroom threads from al-Ekhlass and al-Hesbah, discussing the possibility of nuclear attacks on the West.
However, it has transpired that far from being a detailed simulation created by terrorist masterminds, the apocalyptic vision is in fact lifted from the computer game Fallout 3, by US game designers Bethesda Softworks.
Rita Katz (born 1963, Basra, Iraq) is an American intelligence specialist and co-founder of the SITE Institute, a private intelligence firm based in Washington, DC which focuses on tracking global terrorist networks, and intercepting and distributing secret messages, videos and advance warnings of suicide bombings from the terrorist group’s communications networks…
Katz, a fluent Arabic speaker, was born in Basra in 1963 to a wealthy Iraqi Jewish family. In 1968 her father was arrested on charges of spying for Israel and the rest of the family put under house arrest. The following year Katz’s father was convicted and executed in a public hanging and Katz’s mother managed to escape with the children to Israel.
While in Israel, Katz served in the Israeli Defense Forces and studied politics and history at Tel Aviv University. She later married a medical student and in 1997 came to the United States with her husband who received a National Institutes of Health fellowship.
Leak Severed a Link to Al-Qaeda’s Secrets
Washington Post
October 9, 2007
A small private [JEWISH] intelligence company that monitors Islamic terrorist groups obtained a new Osama bin Laden video ahead of its official release last month, and around 10 a.m. on Sept. 7, it notified the Bush administration of its secret acquisition. It gave two senior officials access on the condition that the officials not reveal they had it until the al-Qaeda release.
Within 20 minutes, a range of intelligence agencies had begun downloading it from the company’s Web site. By midafternoon that day, the video and a transcript of its audio track had been leaked from within the Bush administration to cable television news and broadcast worldwide.
The founder of the company, the SITE Intelligence Group, says this premature disclosure tipped al-Qaeda to a security breach and destroyed a years-long surveillance operation that the company has used to intercept and pass along secret messages, videos and advance warnings of suicide bombings from the terrorist group’s communications network.
–1984
[quote]Gkhan wrote:
Do you think if the US pulled out now there would be more bloodshed?
If we did get out, should we continue to arm the resistance to Al-Qaeda, or leave the united tribal leaders hanging?
[/quote]
McCain: ‘Iraq troop pullout would harm Israel’
In his AIPAC speech, McCain called for tough sanctions, outside the UN if necessary, particularly against the Central Bank of Iran, and restrict Iran’s import of refined petroleum products.
McCain also criticized Obama by name for his support of troop withdrawals from Iraq, arguing that would jeopardize Israel’s security and lead to civil war and genocide. To applause, McCain declared, “We must not let this happen.”
[quote]JustTheFacts wrote:
Al-Qaeda Doesn’t Exist
[/quote]
For once you’re close to being right. Might take us another few years or so, but we are routing them.
Lixy’s handlers are next.