A Different Proof of God

[quote]H factor wrote:
Certain things are indeed interesting, but it doesn’t mean they mean anything. Is it “cool” that Reagan had some anti-christ coincidences? I guess if you want to believe that was interesting then it is. We can do that with a million other things (see the vast majority of conspiracy theories of all time) if we just try and circle certain things and relate them to other stuff we are wanting to make significant.

Barack= 6
Hussein= 7
Obama= 5

666 is the mark of the beast, but a 7 letter word with devil is devilry that proves he is Satan right? 6 is the first mark of the beast, 7 represents devilry and we cap it off by seeing the 5 letters also coincide with devil.

Beast, devilry, devil. Hitler had 6 letters and Obama is carrying on his work as his name starts with 6 letters as well. And couldn’t I find a ton of other parallels between evil leader if I wanted to?

See how easy this shit is? Fuck I could make these up all day long.

And a lot of irrational chain mail type people would be STUNNED by the coincidences!

Don’t be irrational and try to find proof in shit because someone really wants to make a certain point. ANYONE can do this with enough time. Ignorant people get those chain mails and forward them on because of how freaky and how proof worthy it is.

Rational people laugh. Be rational. We are over our limit already on ignorance. [/quote]

So Obama is the antichrist? You just knew it had to be a lawyer.

I read perhaps 1/2 of the article.
And while I am unashamedly a devoted Christian, since I have neither training nor inclination to prove it’s claims, got bored after a bit.

Funny how science gets to be the tip of the spear to ‘prove’ there is no God. When I look at the 11(?) systems of the body that all work in harmony to produce life or the interconnectedness of the natural world systems such as gravity, water cycle, CO2/O2 exchange between plants and animals, the sun’s contributions, seasonality, microbial decomposition - I am in awe of a perfect designer/creator.

The facts that are uncovered by science draw me to God, they don’t push me away.

In the end, if the article is true - I would not be surprised nor even amazed. Surely the natural world, easily seen and experienced by every person, is plenty of proof of God.

[quote]mbdix wrote:
I am at work and have not read the whole article. I have read some of it, and seems interesting. So, I wanted to post this here and see what opinions come from it.

http://www.ubm1.org/?page=science[/quote]

'Astounding new discoveries…published 1948…?